Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Which Second-Line Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor(s) for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia?

  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Opinion statement

In patients with chronic myeloid leukemia who require second-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy, many options exist. These treatments include alternate generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors and in some cases consideration of allogeneic transplant. Although efficacious, each tyrosine kinase inhibitor possesses distinct side effects and pharmacological profiles that prevent a generalizable treatment approach. Furthermore, there is limited head-to-head trial data that would suggest the superiority of one tyrosine kinase inhibitor over another to help guide treatment decisions in specific clinical settings. Therefore, we treat each patient independently. A patient’s treatment plan must be personalized by a variety of clinical factors to optimize response and tolerability. Our general approach is to first examine the reason for treatment failure, which may be due to either intolerance or relapse. Second, we consider the age and patient’s comorbidities such as lung disease, diabetes, or cardiovascular disease. In patients who have inadequate responses, we analyze the patient’s BCR-ABL1 mutational profile, which is beneficial if that patient harbors a specific tyrosine kinase inhibitor responsive mutation, such as T315I. Using these steps, we can provide a generalizable approach to choosing the appropriate second-line tyrosine inhibitor for chronic myeloid leukemia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Cortes J, Quintás-Cardama A, Kantarjian HM. Monitoring molecular response in chronic myeloid leukemia. Cancer. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.25527.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. O’Brien SG, et al. Imatinib compared with interferon and low-dose cytarabine for newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2003. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa022457.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Deininger M, et al. International randomized study of interferon vs STI571 (IRIS) 8-year follow up: sustained survival and low risk for progression or events in patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) treated with imatinib. Blood. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.v114.22.1126.1126.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Jabbour E, et al. Imatinib mesylate dose escalation is associated with durable responses in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia after cytogenetic failure on standard-dose imatinib therapy. Blood. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2008-04-154344.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Hochhaus A, et al. Dasatinib induces durable cytogenetic responses in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia in chronic phase with resistance or intolerance to imatinib. Leukemia. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2008.84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kantarjian HM, et al. Nilotinib is effective in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase after imatinib resistance or intolerance: 24-month follow-up results. Blood. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2010-03-277152.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Cortes JE, et al. Safety and efficacy of bosutinib (SKI-606) in chronic phase Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia patients with resistance or intolerance to imatinib. Blood. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2011-05-355594.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Kantarjian HM, et al. Imatinib dose escalation is effective in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP). Blood. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.v110.11.1047.1047.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Marin D, et al. Transient benefit only from increasing the imatinib dose in CML patients who do not achieve complete cytogenetic remissions on conventional doses [7] (multiple letters). Blood. 2003. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2003-06-2042.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zonder JA, Pemberton P, Brandt H, Mohamed AN, Schiffer CA. The effect of dose increase of imatinib mesylate in patients with chronic or accelerated phase chronic myelogenous leukemia with inadequate hematologic or cytogenetic response to initial treatment. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9(6):2092–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shah NP. Loss of response to imatinib: mechanisms and management. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1182/asheducation-2005.1.183.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Garcia-Gutierrez JV, et al. Impact of second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors as second line treatment for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.v118.21.3780.3780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. O’Hare T, et al. In vitro activity of Bcr-Abl inhibitors AMN107 and BMS-354825 against clinically relevant imatinib-resistant Abl kinase domain mutants. Cancer Res. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-0259.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shah NP et al. Overriding imatinib resistance with a novel ABL kinase inhibitor. Science (80-. ). 2004. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1099480.

  15. Hochhaus A, et al. Dasatinib induces notable hematologic and cytogenetic responses in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia after failure of imatinib therapy. Blood. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2006-09-047266.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kantarjian H, et al. Dasatinib or high-dose imatinib for chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia after failure of first-line imatinib: a randomized phase 2 trial. Blood. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2006-11-056028.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. O’Brien SG, et al. Spirit 2: an NCRI randomised study comparing dasatinib with imatinib in patients with newly diagnosed CML. Blood. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.v124.21.517.517.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Weisberg E, et al. Characterization of AMN107, a selective inhibitor of native and mutant Bcr-Abl. Cancer Cell. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2005.01.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hazarika M, et al. Tasigna for chronic and accelerated phase philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myelogenous leukemia resistant to or intolerant of imatinib. Clin Cancer Res. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0308.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. H-G, G et al. Efficacy of nilotinib versus high-dose imatinib in early chronic phase CML patients who have suboptimal molecular responses to standard-dose imatinib (RE-NICE multicenter study). Blood. 2011;118(21):2765. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.V118.21.2765.2765.

  21. Nicolini FE, et al. Expanding nilotinib access in clinical trials (ENACT): an open-label, multicenter study of oral nilotinib in adult patients with imatinib-resistant or imatinib-intolerant Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia in the chronic phase. Cancer. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.26249.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hughes TP, et al. Sustained deep molecular responses in patients switched to nilotinib due to persistent BCR-ABL1 on imatinib: final ENESTcmr randomized trial results. Leukemia. 2017;31:2529.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Yeung DT, et al. TIDEL-Ii: First-line use of imatinib in CML with early switch to nilotinib for failure to achieve time-dependent molecular targets. Blood. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2014-07-590315.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Hochhaus A, et al. Long-term benefits and risks of frontline nilotinib vs imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: 5-year update of the randomized ENESTnd trial. Leukemia. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2016.5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Steinbach A, Clark SM, Clemmons AB. Bosutinib: a novel Src/Abl kinase inhibitor for chronic myelogenous leukemia. J Adv Pract Oncol. 2013. https://doi.org/10.6004/jadpro.2013.4.6.8.

  26. Cortes JE, et al. Bosutinib versus imatinib for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia: results from the randomized BFORE trial. J Clin Oncol. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2017.74.7162.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Soverini S, et al. Implications of BCR-ABL1 kinase domain-mediated resistance in chronic myeloid leukemia. Leuk Res. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leukres.2013.09.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kaehler M, Cascorbi I. Pharmacogenomics of impaired tyrosine kinase inhibitor response: lessons learned from chronic myelogenous leukemia. Front Pharmacol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.696960.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Morozova EV, Vlasova YY, Pryanishnikova MV, Lepik KV, Afanasyev BV. Efficacy of dasatinib in a CML patient in blast crisis with F317L mutation: a case report and literature review. Biomark Insights. 2015. https://doi.org/10.4137/BMI.S22438.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Balabanov S, Braig M, Brümmendorf TH. Current aspects in resistance against tyrosine kinase inhibitors in chronic myelogenous leukemia. Drug Discov Today Technol. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ddtec.2014.03.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. MeenakshiSundaram DN, et al. Current outlook on drug resistance in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and potential therapeutic options. Drug Discovery Today. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2019.05.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Jabbour E, et al. Practical advice for determining the role of BCR-ABL mutations in guiding tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. Cancer. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.25717.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Müller MC, et al. Dasatinib treatment of chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: analysis of responses according to preexisting BCR-ABL mutations. Blood. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2009-04-214221.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Hughes T, et al. Impact of baseline BCR-ABL mutations on response to nilotinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase. J Clin Oncol. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.21.8230.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Kantarjian HM, et al. Bosutinib safety and management of toxicity in leukemia patients with resistance or intolerance to imatinib and other tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Blood. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2013-07-513937.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Hochhaus A, et al. European LeukemiaNet 2020 recommendations for treating chronic myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-020-0776-2. This paper is of importance as it serves as the official guidelines and recommendations by the European LeukemiaNet panel for the monitoring and reatment of CML in the first line and second line, along with side effects that must be considered with each TKI.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Soverini S, et al. BCR-ABL kinase domain mutation analysis in chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: recommendations from an expert panel on behalf of European LeukemiaNet. Blood. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2010-12-326405.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Castagnetti F, et al. Dose optimization in elderly CML patients treated with bosutinib after intolerance or failure of first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Blood. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2019-127514. This abstract was of particular importance as it was phase 2 single arm study showing the tolerability of bosutinib in elderly patients who have previously failed first line TKIs.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Braun TP, Eide CA, Druker BJ. Response and resistance to BCR-ABL1-targeted therapies. Cancer Cell. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2020.03.006. This paper is of importance as it is an in-depth review of mechanism that leads to TKI resistance and strategies to overcome resistance.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. O’Hare T, et al. AP24534, a Pan-BCR-ABL inhibitor for chronic myeloid leukemia, potently inhibits the T315I mutant and overcomes mutation-based resistance. Cancer Cell. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2009.09.028.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Cortes JE, et al. Ponatinib efficacy and safety in Philadelphia chromosome–positive leukemia: final 5-year results of the phase 2 PACE trial. Blood. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2016-09-739086. This paper was of major importance was it the follow-up data on the safety and efficacy of ponatinib, highlighting not only its efficacy the increased risk of arterial occlusive events in patients taking ponatinib.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Hughes TP, et al. Asciminib in chronic myeloid leukemia after ABL kinase inhibitor failure. N Engl J Med. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1902328. This paper was of major importance is it was the first demonstration of the targeting an alternative binding site of the BCR-ABL1 protein and therefore provided a new therapy to patients with resistant mutations.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Pulte, E Dianne et al. FDA Approval summary: Revised indication and dosing regimen for ponatinib based on the results of the OPTIC Trial. The oncologist. (2022);27(2):149–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyab040.

  44. Cortes JE, et al. A phase 2 trial of ponatinib in Philadelphia chromosome–positive leukemias. N Engl J Med. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1306494.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Wylie AA, et al. The allosteric inhibitor ABL001 enables dual targeting of BCR-ABL1. Nature. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21702.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Réa D, et al. A phase 3, open-label, randomized study of asciminib, a STAMP inhibitor, vs bosutinib in CML after 2 or more prior TKIs. Blood. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2020009984. This paper is of importance as it is a phase 3 trial that demonstrates asciminib having superior efficacy vs bosutinib and an improved safety profile in patients with CML-CP after at least 2 prior TKIs and therefore having the potential to become the stand of care for this patient population.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Nicolini FE, et al. Overall survival with ponatinib versus allogeneic stem cell transplantation in Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemias with the T315I mutation. Cancer. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.30558.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Jabbour E, et al. Results of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for chronic myelogenous leukemia patients who failed tyrosine kinase inhibitors after developing BCR-ABL1 kinase domain mutations. Blood. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2010-08-302679.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Marin D, et al. Adherence is the critical factor for achieving molecular responses in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia who achieve complete cytogenetic responses on imatinib. J Clin Oncol. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.26.3087.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Bazeos A, et al. Long term adherence to imatinib therapy is the critical factor for achieving molecular responses in chronic myeloid leukemia patients. Blood. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.v114.22.3290.3290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Druker BJ, et al. Five-year follow-up of patients receiving imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa062867.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Powell BL, et al. Nilotinib responses and tolerability confirmed in North American patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) from ENACT (expanding nilotinib access in clinical trials). Blood. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.v114.22.3295.3295.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Mauro MJ, et al. Dasatinib 2-year efficacy in patients with chronic-phase chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML-CP) with resistance or intolerance to imatinib (START-C). J Clin Oncol. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2008.26.15_suppl.7009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Kantarjian HM, et al. Nilotinib (formerly AMN107), a highly selective BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is effective in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myelogenous leukemia in chronic phase following imatinib resistance and intolerance. Blood. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2007-03-080689.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Le Coutre P, et al. Nilotinib (formerly AMN107), a highly selective BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is active in patients with imatinib-resistant or -intolerant accelerated-phase chronic myelogenous leukemia. Blood. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2007-04-083196.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Cortes JE, et al. Minimal cross-intolerance with nilotinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic or accelerated phase who are intolerant to imatinib. Blood. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2010-11-318949.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Mauro MJ, Deininger MW. Management of drug toxicities in chronic myeloid leukaemia. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beha.2009.06.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Deininger, Michael W et al. Chronic myeloid leukemia, version 2.2021, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN 2020;18(10):1385–1415. https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyab040.

  59. Garcia-Gutiérrez, Valentín et al. Safety and efficacy of asciminib treatment in chronic myeloid leukemia patients in real-life clinical practice.” Blood Cancer J. 2021;11(2)16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-021-00420-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Boons CC, et al. Effects of food on the pharmacokinetics of nilotinib in chronic myeloid leukemia: enabling significant dose reduction and relief of treatment burden: the NIFO-study. Blood. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2018-99-118149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Cortes JE, et al. Final analysis of the efficacy and tolerability of subcutaneous omacetaxine mepesuccinate, ≥24 months after first dose, in patients with chronic phase (CP) or accelerated phase (AP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Blood. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.v122.21.2743.2743.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Jiang Q, et al. Olverembatinib (HQP1351), a well-tolerated and effective tyrosine kinase inhibitor for patients with T315I-mutated chronic myeloid leukemia: results of an open-label, multicenter phase 1/2 trial. J Hematol Oncol. 2022;15:1–17.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Cortes JE, et al. Phase 1 trial of vodobatinib, a novel oral BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI): activity in CML chronic phase patients failing TKI therapies including ponatinib. Blood. 2020;136:51–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Kerkelä R, et al. Cardiotoxicity of the cancer therapeutic agent imatinib mesylate. Nat Med. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm1446.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Quintás-Cardama A, et al. Pleural effusion in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia treated with dasatinib after imatinib failure. J Clin Oncol. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.12.0329.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Montani D, et al. Pulmonary arterial hypertension in patients treated by dasatinib. Circulation. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.079921.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Saglio G, et al. Nilotinib versus imatinib for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa0912614.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Wang Z, Jiang L, Yan H, Xu Z, Luo P. Adverse events associated with nilotinib in chronic myeloid leukemia: mechanisms and management strategies. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512433.2021.1894129.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Selina M. Luger MD.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Robert Schwab declares that he has no conflicts of interest. Selina Luger declares that she has no conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schwab, R.D., Luger, S.M. Which Second-Line Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor(s) for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia?. Curr. Treat. Options in Oncol. 24, 757–769 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-023-01088-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-023-01088-x

Keywords

Navigation