Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Not All Leiomyosarcomas Are the Same: How to Best Classify LMS

  • Sarcoma (SH Okuno, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Opinion statement

Leiomyosarcoma arises from smooth muscle and represents one of the most common soft tissue sarcomas. Despite aggressive multimodality care, over half of the patients will ultimately develop metastatic and incurable disease with a median survival of 12–18 months. At present, there is no standard system to classify leiomyosarcoma, which itself is a heterogeneous disease. Classification by tumor location is the most simplistic approach and is most frequently utilized in clinical practice. Tumor location impacts diagnosis (recognition pre-operatively versus at the time of surgery) as well as treatment (ability to completely resect with clear margins with minimal morbidity). While tumor location can impact prognosis, for example, extremity tumors would generally be considered as lower risk than inferior vena cava tumors, leiomyosarcoma can exhibit a heterogeneous behavior irrespective of tumor location. Specifically, some patients have rapidly progressing disease despite aggressive chemotherapy, while others display a more indolent course even in the metastatic setting. The pathogenic drivers of the heterogeneity observed in tumor behavior are not well understood. As we learn more about the molecular composition of leiomyosarcoma, various classification groups have been proposed as discussed here. Ultimately, it is unlikely that one variable will be adequate for tumor classification, and a combination of location and molecular composition will be necessary to develop appropriate risk stratification nomograms and treatment strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Choi JH, Ro JY. The 2020 WHO classification of tumors of soft tissue: selected changes and new entities. Adv Anat Pathol. 2021;28(1):44–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brennan MF, et al. Lessons learned from the study of 10,000 patients with soft tissue sarcoma. Ann Surg. 2014;260(3):416–21 (discussion 421-2).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lamm W, et al. Distinctive outcome in patients with non-uterine and uterine leiomyosarcoma. BMC Cancer. 2014;14(1):981.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. • George S, et al. Soft tissue and uterine leiomyosarcoma. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(2):144–50. Contemporary comprehensive review of leiomyosarcoma.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang Z, et al. Survival of patients with metastatic leiomyosarcoma: the MD Anderson Clinical Center for targeted therapy experience. Cancer Med. 2016;5(12):3437–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Judson I, et al. Doxorubicin alone versus intensified doxorubicin plus ifosfamide for first-line treatment of advanced or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma: a randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(4):415–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Seddon B, et al. Gemcitabine and docetaxel versus doxorubicin as first-line treatment in previously untreated advanced unresectable or metastatic soft-tissue sarcomas (GeDDiS): a randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(10):1397–410.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Oosten AW, et al. Outcomes of first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced or metastatic leiomyosarcoma of uterine and non-uterine origin. Sarcoma. 2009;2009:348910.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. •• Burns J, Jones RL, Huang PH. Molecular subtypes of leiomyosarcoma: moving toward a consensus. Clin Transl Discov. 2022;2(4):e149. A review of the literature for molecular subtyping and clinical imact.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Neuville A, Chibon F, Coindre J-M. Grading of soft tissue sarcomas: from histological to molecular assessment. Pathology. 2014;46(2):113–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bonvalot S, et al. Preoperative radiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for patients with primary retroperitoneal sarcoma (EORTC-62092: STRASS): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(10):1366–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. D’Ambrosio L, et al. Doxorubicin plus dacarbazine, doxorubicin plus ifosfamide, or doxorubicin alone as a first-line treatment for advanced leiomyosarcoma: a propensity score matching analysis from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group. Cancer. 2020;126(11):2637–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pritts EA, et al. The prevalence of occult leiomyosarcoma at surgery for presumed uterine fibroids: a meta-analysis. Gynecol Surg. 2015;12(3):165–77.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Zak K, Zaremba B, Rajkak Ak, Kotarski J, Amant F, Bobinski M. Perioperative differentiation of uterine leiomyoma and leiomyosarcomas: current possibilities and future directions. Cancers. 2022;14(8):1966–91.

  15. Mingoli A, et al. Leiomyosarcoma of the inferior vena cava: analysis and search of world literature on 141 patients and report of three new cases. J Vasc Surg. 1991;14(5):688–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wachtel H, et al. Outcomes after resection of leiomyosarcomas of the inferior vena cava: a pooled data analysis of 377 cases. Surg Oncol. 2015;24(1):21–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hollenbeck ST, et al. Surgical treatment and outcomes of patients with primary inferior vena cava leiomyosarcoma. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;197(4):575–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. • Beck AH, et al. Discovery of molecular subtypes in leiomyosarcoma through integrative molecular profiling. Oncogene. 2010;29(6):845–54. First discovery of variable molecular subtypes in leiomyosarcoma.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Guo X, et al. Clinically relevant molecular subtypes in leiomyosarcoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21(15):3501–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Barlin JN, et al. Molecular subtypes of uterine leiomyosarcoma and correlation with clinical outcome. Neoplasia. 2015;17(2):183–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Comprehensive and integrated genomic characterization of adult soft tissue sarcomas. Cell. 2017;171(4):950–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chudasama P, et al. Integrative genomic and transcriptomic analysis of leiomyosarcoma. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):144.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Anderson ND, et al. Lineage-defined leiomyosarcoma subtypes emerge years before diagnosis and determine patient survival. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):4496.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Hemming ML, et al. Oncogenic gene-expression programs in leiomyosarcoma and characterization of conventional, inflammatory, and uterogenic subtypes. Mol Cancer Res. 2020;18(9):1302–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Guo X, Forgó E, van de Rijn M. Molecular subtyping of leiomyosarcoma with 3’ end RNA sequencing. Genomics data. 2015;5:366–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Oza J, et al. Homologous recombination repair deficiency as a therapeutic target in sarcoma. Semin Oncol. 2020;47(6):380–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Yang J, et al. Therapeutic perspectives for adult soft tissue sarcoma-updates from the 2022 ASCO annual meeting. Cancer Biol Med. 2022;19(10):1496–502.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. • Schaefer IM, et al. Relationships between highly recurrent tumor suppressor alterations in 489 leiomyosarcomas. Cancer. 2021;127(15):2666–73. Molecular analysis of larges leiomyosarcoma cohort to date.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Pautier P, et al. Doxorubicin alone versus doxorubicin with trabectedin followed by trabectedin alone as first-line therapy for metastatic or unresectable leiomyosarcoma (LMS-04): a randomised, multicentre, open-label phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2022;23(8):1044–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hemming ML, et al. Preclinical modeling of leiomyosarcoma identifies susceptibility to transcriptional CDK inhibitors through antagonism of E2F-driven oncogenic gene expression. Clin Cancer Res. 2022;28(11):2397–408.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Kim CG, et al. Phase II clinical trial of eribulin-gemcitabine combination therapy in previously treated patients with advanced liposarcoma or leiomyosarcoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2022;28(15):3225–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Chen TW, et al. A single-arm phase Ib/II study of lenvatinib plus eribulin in advanced liposarcoma and leiomyosarcoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2022;28(23):5058–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brittany L. Siontis MD.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors do not have any potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Sarcoma

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hickman, A., Siontis, B.L. Not All Leiomyosarcomas Are the Same: How to Best Classify LMS. Curr. Treat. Options in Oncol. 24, 327–337 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-023-01067-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-023-01067-2

Keywords

Navigation