Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Leveraging Social Media for Cardio-Oncology

  • Cardio-oncology (MG Fradley, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Opinion statement

As the world becomes more connected through online and offline social networking, there has been much discussion of how the rapid rise of social media could be used in ways that can be productive and instructive in various healthcare specialties, such as Cardiology and its subspecialty areas. In this review, the role of social media in the field of Cardio-Oncology is discussed. With an estimated 17 million cancer survivors in the USA in 2019 and 22 million estimated by 2030, more education and awareness are needed. Networking and collaboration are also needed to meet the needs of our patients and healthcare professionals in this emerging field bridging two disciplines. Cardiovascular disease is second only to recurrence of the primary cancer or diagnosis with a secondary malignancy, as a leading cause of death in cancer survivors. A majority of these survivors are anticipated to be on social media seeking information, support, and ideas for optimizing health. Healthcare professionals in Cardio-Oncology are also online for networking, education, scholarship, career development, and advocacy in this field. Here, we describe the utilization and potential impact of social media in Cardio-Oncology, with inclusion of various hashtags frequently used in the Cardio-Oncology Twitter community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Notes

  1. For ease of access, we have shortened the weblinks to TinyUrl.Com/SoMeOverview and TinyUrl.Com/SoMeDropbox.

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Parwani P, Choi AD, Lopez-Mattei J, Raza S, Chen T, Narang A, et al. Understanding social media: opportunities for cardiovascular medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73(9):1089–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mandrola J. Futyma P. Trends Cardiovasc Med: The role of social media in cardiology; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Schumacher KR, Lee JM, Pasquali SK. Social media in paediatric heart disease: professional use and opportunities to improve cardiac care. Cardiol Young. 2015;25(8):1584–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rosselló X, Stanbury M, Beeri R, Kirchhof P, Casadei B, Kotecha D. Digital learning and the future cardiologist. Eur Heart J. 2019;40(6):499–501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pemmaraju N. Editorial overview: emerging importance of social media for real-time communication in the modern medical era. Semin Hematol. 2017;54(4):175–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Perales MA, Drake EK, Pemmaraju N, Wood WA. Social media and the adolescent and young adult (AYA) patient with Cancer. Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2016;11(6):449–55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Katz MS, Utengen A, Anderson PF, Thompson MA, Attai DJ, Johnston C, et al. Disease-specific Hashtags for online communication about Cancer care. JAMA Oncol. 2016;2(3):392–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pemmaraju N, Thompson MA, Mesa RA, Desai T. Analysis of the use and impact of twitter during American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meetings from 2011 to 2016: focus on advanced metrics and user trends. J Oncol Pract. 2017;13(7):e623–e31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Sedrak MS, Dizon DS, Anderson PF, Fisch MJ, Graham DL, Katz MS, et al. The emerging role of professional social media use in oncology. Future Oncol. 2017;13(15):1281–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dizon DS, Graham D, Thompson MA, Johnson LJ, Johnston C, Fisch MJ, et al. Practical guidance: the use of social media in oncology practice. J Oncol Pract. 2012;8(5):e114–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Walsh MN. Social media and cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(9):1044–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69(1):7–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pemmaraju N, Gupta V, Mesa R, Thompson MA. Social media and Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN)--focus on twitter and the development of a disease-specific community: #MPNSM. Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2015;10(4):413–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pemmaraju N, Utengen A, Gupta V, Thompson MA, Lane AA. Blastic Plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) on social media: #BPDCN-increasing exposure over two years since inception of a disease-specific twitter community. Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2018;13(6):581–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Widmer RJ, Larsen CM. Call for FITs/ECs to become engaged with social media. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68(4):422–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chang HM, Moudgil R, Scarabelli T, Okwuosa TM, Yeh ETH. Cardiovascular complications of Cancer therapy: best practices in diagnosis, prevention, and management: part 1. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(20):2536–51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Chang HM, Okwuosa TM, Scarabelli T, Moudgil R, Yeh ETH. Cardiovascular complications of Cancer therapy: best practices in diagnosis, prevention, and management: part 2. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(20):2552–65.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Hu JR, Florido R, Lipson EJ, Naidoo J, Ardehali R, Tocchetti CG, et al. Cardiovascular toxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Cardiovasc Res. 2019;115(5):854–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Zarifa A, Salih M, Lopez-Mattei J, Lee H, Iliescu C, Hassan S, et al. Cardiotoxicity of FDA-approved immune checkpoint inhibitors: a rare but serious adverse event. Journal of Immunotherapy and Precision Oncology. 2018;1(2):68–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Touyz RM, Herrmann J. Cardiotoxicity with vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor therapy. NPJ Precis Oncol. 2018;2:13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Brown SA, Nhola L, Herrmann J. Cardiovascular toxicities of small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors: an opportunity for systems-based approaches. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2017;101(1):65–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cifu AS, Vandross AL, Prasad V. Case reports in the age of twitter. Am J Med. 2019.

  23. Yeh RW. Academic cardiology and social media: navigating the wisdom and madness of the crowd. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018;11(4):e004736.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hudson S, Mackenzie G. Not your daughter's Facebook': twitter use at the European Society of Cardiology Conference 2018. Heart. 2019;105(2):169–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tanoue MT, Chatterjee D, Nguyen HL, Sekimura T, West BH, Elashoff D, et al. Tweeting the meeting. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018;11(11):e005018.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Pemmaraju N, Mesa RA, Majhail NS, Thompson MA. The use and impact of twitter at medical conferences: best practices and twitter etiquette. Semin Hematol. 2017;54(4):184–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Søreide K, Mackenzie G, Polom K, Lorenzon L, Mohan H, Mayol J. Tweeting the meeting: quantitative and qualitative twitter activity during the 38th ESSO conference. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019;45(2):284–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Chaudhry A, Glodé LM, Gillman M, Miller RS. Trends in twitter use by physicians at the american society of clinical oncology annual meeting, 2010 and 2011. J Oncol Pract. 2012;8(3):173–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Gorodeski E. Make your mark at medical meetings with social media 2018 [Available from: https://www.medpagetoday.com/practicemanagement/informationtechnology/72320.

  30. Redfern J, Ingles J, Neubeck L, Johnston S, Semsarian C. Tweeting our way to cardiovascular health. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(15):1657–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lopez M, Chan TM, Thoma B, Arora VM, Trueger NS. The social media editor at medical journals: responsibilities, goals, barriers, and facilitators. Acad Med : Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges. 2019;94(5):701–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. JACC: CardioOncology – Launching in September 2019 [Website]. 2019 [updated 2019. Available from: http://www.onlinejacc.org/JACC-CardioOncology.

  33. @JACCJournals. Twitter2019 [tweet]. Available from: https://twitter.com/JACCJournals/status/1156580649932926980?s=20.

  34. Barac A, Murtagh G, Carver JR, Chen MH, Freeman AM, Herrmann J, et al. Cardiovascular health of patients with Cancer and Cancer survivors. A Roadmap to the Next Level. 2015;65(25):2739–46.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Parwani P, Choi AD, Lopez-Mattei J, Raza S, Chen T, Narang A, et al. Understanding social media. Opportunities for Cardiovascular Medicine. 2019;73(9):1089–93.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Househ M, Borycki E, Kushniruk A. Empowering patients through social media: the benefits and challenges. Health Informatics J. 2014;20(1):50–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Campbell L, Evans Y, Pumper M, Moreno MA. Social media use by physicians: a qualitative study of the new frontier of medicine. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016;16:91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Hawkins CM, DeLa OA, Hung C. Social media and the patient experience. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016;13(12 Pt B):1615–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kuehn BM. Social media becomes a growing force in cardiology. Circulation. 2019;140(9):790–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Attai DJ, Cowher MS, Al-Hamadani M, Schoger JM, Staley AC, Landercasper J. Twitter social media is an effective tool for breast Cancer patient education and support: patient-reported outcomes by survey. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(7):e188.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Thompson MA, Younes A, Miller RS. Using social media in oncology for education and patient engagement. Oncology (Williston Park). 2012;26(9):782, 4–5, 91.

  42. Chou WY, Hunt YM, Beckjord EB, Moser RP, Hesse BW. Social media use in the United States: implications for health communication. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11(4):e48.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Widmer RJ, Shepard M, Aase LA, Wald JT, Pruthi S, Timimi FK. The impact of social media on negative online physician reviews: an observational study in a large, academic. Multispecialty Practice J Gen Intern Med. 2019;34(1):98–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Bleyer A, Barr R. Cancer in young adults 20 to 39 years of age: overview. Semin Oncol. 2009;36(3):194–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Wood WA, Lee SJ. Malignant hematologic diseases in adolescents and young adults. Blood. 2011;117(22):5803–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Parsons HM, Schmidt S, Harlan LC, Kent EE, Lynch CF, Smith AW, et al. Young and uninsured: insurance patterns of recently diagnosed adolescent and young adult cancer survivors in the AYA HOPE study. Cancer. 2014;120(15):2352–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Woodruff TK, Smith K, Gradishar W. Oncologists' role in patient fertility care: a call to action. JAMA Oncol. 2016;2(2):171–2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Farnan JM, Snyder Sulmasy L, Worster BK, Chaudhry HJ, Rhyne JA, Arora VM, et al. Online medical professionalism: patient and public relationships: policy statement from the American College of Physicians and the Federation of State Medical Boards. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(8):620–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Farnan JM, Sulmasy LS, Chaudhry H. Online medical professionalism. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159(2):158–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Cabrera D, Vartabedian BS, Spinner RJ, Jordan BL, Aase LA, Timimi FK. More than likes and tweets: creating social media portfolios for academic promotion and tenure. J Grad Med Educ. 2017;9(4):421–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Cabrera D, Roy D, Chisolm MS. Social media scholarship and alternative metrics for academic promotion and tenure. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018;15(1 Pt B):135–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Sherbino J, Arora VM, Van Melle E, Rogers R, Frank JR, Holmboe ES. Criteria for social media-based scholarship in health professions education. Postgrad Med J. 2015;91(1080):551–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Quinn A, Chan TM, Sampson C, Grossman C, Butts C, Casey J, et al. Curated collections for educators: five key papers on evaluating digital scholarship. Cureus. 2018;10(1):e2021.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Carpenter CR, Cone DC, Sarli CC. Using publication metrics to highlight academic productivity and research impact. Acad Emerg Med. 2014;21(10):1160–72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Widmer RJ, Mandrekar J, Ward A, Aase LA, Lanier WL, Timimi FK, et al. Effect of promotion via social media on access of articles in an academic medical journal: a randomized controlled trial. Acad Med. 2019.

  56. Finch T, O'Hanlon N, Dudley SP. Tweeting birds: online mentions predict future citations in ornithology. R Soc Open Sci. 2017;4(11):171371.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Buckarma EH, Thiels CA, Gas BL, Cabrera D, Bingener-Casey J, Farley DR. Influence of social media on the dissemination of a traditional surgical research article. J Surg Educ. 2017;74(1):79–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Eysenbach G. Can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(4):e123.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Smith ZL, Chiang AL, Bowman D, Wallace MB. Longitudinal relationship between social media activity and article citations in the journal Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019;90(1):77–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Chan TM, Stukus D, Leppink J, Duque L, Bigham BL, Mehta N, et al. Social media and the 21st-century scholar: how you can harness social media to amplify your career. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018;15(1 Pt B):142–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA

    Sherry-Ann Brown MD PhD

  2. Cardio-Oncology Program, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 W Watertown Plank Road, Wauwatosa, WI, 53226, USA

    Sherry-Ann Brown MD PhD

  3. Franciscan Health-Indianapolis. Indiana Heart Physicians, 5330 East Stop 11 Road, Indianapolis, IN, 46237, USA

    Ryan P. Daly MD

  4. K4/554 5666 Clinical Science Center, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, 600 Highland Ave., Madison, WI, 53792, USA

    Narjust Duma MD

  5. UCLA Cardio-Oncology Program, Division of Cardiology, UCLA Cardiovascular Center, 100 Medical Plaza, Suite 630, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA

    Eric H. Yang MD

  6. MD Anderson Cancer Center, Leukemia, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 0428, Houston, TX, USA

    Naveen Pemmaraju MD

  7. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Loma Linda University Health, 11234 Anderson Street, Room 4404, Loma Linda, CA, 92354, USA

    Purvi Parwani MBBS

  8. Division of Cardiology and Department of Radiology, The George Washington University School of Medicine, 2150 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 4-417, Washington, DC, 20037, USA

    Andrew D. Choi MD

  9. Departments of Cardiology & Thoracic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, USA

    Juan Lopez-Mattei MD

  10. Departments of Cardiology & Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA

    Juan Lopez-Mattei MD

Authors
  1. Sherry-Ann Brown MD PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ryan P. Daly MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Narjust Duma MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Eric H. Yang MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Naveen Pemmaraju MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Purvi Parwani MBBS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Andrew D. Choi MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Juan Lopez-Mattei MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan Lopez-Mattei MD.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Sherry-Ann Brown declares that she has no conflict of interest. Ryan P. Daly serves as a social media consultant for JACC: CardioOncology Narjust Duma has received compensation from Inivata for service as a consultant. Eric H. Yang declares that he has no conflict of interest. Naveen Pemmaraju has received research funding from AbbVie, Stemline Therapeutics, Novartis, Samus Therapeutics, Cellectis, Plexxikon, Daiichi Sankyo, Affymetrix; is supported by grants from the Sager Strong Foundation and Dan’s House of Hope; has received compensation from AbbVie, Celgene, Stemline Therapeutics, Incyte, Novartis, Mustang Bio, Roche Diagnostics, and LFB for service as a consultant; and has served as a board member/volunteer for Dan’s House of Hope and the HemOnc Times/Oncology Times. Purvi Parwani has received compensation for service as a consultant on the Journal of the American College of Cardiology. Andrew D. Choi declares that he has no conflict of interest. Juan Lopez-Mattei has received compensation from Arterys for service as a consultant.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Cardio-oncology

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brown, SA., Daly, R.P., Duma, N. et al. Leveraging Social Media for Cardio-Oncology. Curr. Treat. Options in Oncol. 21, 83 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-020-00775-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-020-00775-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation