Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Overview of the 8th Edition TNM Classification for Head and Neck Cancer

  • Head and Neck Cancer (L Licitra, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Opinion Statement

The main purpose of the TNM system is to provide an anatomic-based classification to adequately depict cancer prognosis. Accurate cancer staging is important for treatment selection and outcome prediction, research design, and cancer control activities. To maintain clinical relevance, periodical updates to TNM are necessary. The recently published 8th edition TNM classification institutes the following changes to the staging of head and neck (excluding thyroid cancer): new stage classifications [HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer (HPV+ OPC) and soft tissue sarcoma of the head and neck (HN-STS)] and modification of T and N categories [T and N categories for nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC), T categories for oral cavity squamous cell carcinomas (OSCC), N categories for non-viral related head and neck cancer and unknown primary (CUP), and T categories for head and neck cutaneous carcinoma]. These changes reflect better understanding tumor biology and clinical behavior (e.g., HPV+ OPC and HN-STS), improved outcomes associated with technical advances in diagnosis and treatment (e.g., NPC), evolving knowledge about additional prognostic factors and risk stratification from research and observation (e.g., inclusion of depth of invasion variable for OSCC, inclusion of extranodal extension variable for all non-viral head and neck cancer, and reintroduction of size criteria for non-Merkel cell cutaneous carcinoma of the head and neck). This review summarizes the changes and potential advantages and limitations/caveats associated with them. Further evidence is needed to evaluate whether these changes would result in improvement in TNM stage performance to better serve the needs for clinical care, research, and cancer control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. The Union for International Cancer Control (UICC). TNM history, evolution and milestones. In. http://www.uicc.org/sites/main/files/private/History_Evolution_Milestones_0.pdf: The Union for International Cancer Control (UICC).

  2. American Joint Committee for Cancer Staging and End-Results Reporting (AJC). Manual for staging of cancer 1977. American Joint Committee on Cancer 1977.

  3. Sobin LH, Brierley J, Gospodarowicz M, et al. Principles of cancer staging. In: O'Sullivan B, Brierley J, D'Cruz A, et al., editors. UICC manual of clinical oncology. 9th ed. Chichester: Wiley; 2015. p. 34–9.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Gospodarowicz MK, Miller D, Groome PA, et al. The process for continuous improvement of the TNM classification. Cancer. 2004;100:1–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brierley J, Gospodarowicz M, Wittekind C. UICC TNM classification of malignant tumours. Eighth ed. Chichester: Wiley; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Amin M, Edge S, Greene F, et al. AJCC cancer staging manual. Eighth ed. New York: Springer; 2017.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. O'Sullivan B. Head and neck tumours. In: Brierley J, Gospodarowicz M, Ch W, et al., editors. UICC TNM classification of Malignant Tumours. Eighth ed. Chichester: Wiley; 2017. p. 17–54.

    Google Scholar 

  8. O'Sullivan B, Lydiatt W, Haughey BH, et al. HPV-mediated (p16+) oropharyngeal cancer. In: Amin M, Edge S, Greene F, et al., editors. AJCC cancer staging manual. Eighth ed. New York: Springer; 2017. p. 113–21.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. O'Sullivan B. Tumours of bone and soft tissues. In: Brierley J, Gospodarowicz M, Ch W, et al., editors. UICC TNM classification of malignant tumours. Eighth ed. Chichester: Wiley; 2017. p. 119–30.

    Google Scholar 

  10. O'Sullivan B, Maki RG, Agulnik M, et al. Soft tissue sarcoma of the head and neck. In: Amin M, Edge S, Greene F, et al., editors. AJCC cancer staging manual. Eighth ed. New York: Springer; 2017. p. 113–21.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Patel S, Lydiatt W, Ridge J, et al. Cervical lymph nodes and unknown primary tumors of the head and neck. In: Amin M, Edge S, Greene F, et al., editors. AJCC cancer staging manual. Eighth ed. Swizerland: Springer Nature; 2017. p. 67–78.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee A, Lydiatt W, Colevas AD, et al. Nasopharynx. In: Amin M, Edge S, Greene F, et al., editors. AJCC cancer staging manual. Eighth ed. New York: Springer; 2017. p. 103–11.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Ridge JA, Lydiatt W, Patel SG, et al. Lip and oral cavity. In: Amin M, Edge S, Greene F, et al., editors. AJCC cancer staging manual. Eighth ed. New York: Springer; 2017. p. 79–94.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Califano JA, Lydiatt W, Nehal KS, et al. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. In: Amin M, Edge S, Greene F, et al., editors. AJCC cancer staging manual. Eighth ed. New York: Springer; 2017. p. 171–81.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee A, Brierley J, O'Sullivan B. Skin Tumours. In Brierley J, Gospodarowicz M, Ch W et al. (eds): UICC TNM classification of malignant tumours, Eighth Edition. Chichester Wiley 2017; 131–150.

  16. •• O'Sullivan B, Huang SH, Su J, et al. Development and validation of a staging system for HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer by the International Collaboration on Oropharyngeal cancer Network for Staging (ICON-S): a multicentre cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:440–51. A large multicenter study proposed clinical TNM classification for HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer which was adopted by the 8th edition TNM

  17. •• Haughey BH, Sinha P, Kallogjeri D, et al. Pathology-based staging for HPV-positive squamous carcinoma of the oropharynx. Oral Oncol. 2016;62:11–9. A large multicenter study proposed pathologic TNM classification for HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer which was adopted by the 8th edition TNM

  18. Dahlstrom KR, Calzada G, Hanby JD, et al. An evolution in demographics, treatment, and outcomes of oropharyngeal cancer at a major cancer center: a staging system in need of repair. Cancer. 2013;119:81–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. •• Huang SH, Xu W, Waldron J, et al. Refining American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control TNM stage and prognostic groups for human papillomavirus-related oropharyngeal carcinomas. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:836–45. A large single institution cohort study proved the hypothesis that new staging classification is needed and feasible. It also provided the methodology for deriving TNM and evaluation criteria of TNM performance

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Straetmans JM, Olthof N, Mooren JJ, et al. Human papillomavirus reduces the prognostic value of nodal involvement in tonsillar squamous cell carcinomas. Laryngoscope. 2009;119:1951–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Malm IJ, Fan CJ, Yin LX et al. Evaluation of proposed staging systems for human papillomavirus-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer 2017.

  22. Husain ZA, Chen T, Corso CD et al. A comparison of prognostic ability of staging systems for human papillomavirus-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. JAMA Oncol 2016.

  23. Dahlstrom KR, Garden AS, William WN Jr, et al. Proposed staging system for patients with HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer based on nasopharyngeal cancer N categories. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:1848–54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. •• Sinha P, Kallogjeri D, Gay H, et al. High metastatic node number, not extracapsular spread or N-classification is a node-related prognosticator in transorally-resected, neck-dissected p16-positive oropharynx cancer. Oral Oncol. 2015;51:514–20. A large surgical series showing the importance of pathologic lymph node number for HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sinha P, Lewis JS Jr, Piccirillo JF, et al. Extracapsular spread and adjuvant therapy in human papillomavirus-related, p16-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer. 2012;118:3519–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sinha P, Lewis JS Jr, Kallogjeri D, et al. Soft tissue metastasis in p16-positive oropharynx carcinoma: prevalence and association with distant metastasis. Oral Oncol. 2015;51:778–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. El-Naggar AK, Westra WH. p16 expression as a surrogate marker for HPV-related oropharyngeal carcinoma: a guide for interpretative relevance and consistency. Head Neck. 2012;34:459–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ndiaye C, Mena M, Alemany L, et al. HPV DNA, E6/E7 mRNA, and p16INK4a detection in head and neck cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:1319–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Thomas J, Primeaux T. Is p16 immunohistochemistry a more cost-effective method for identification of human papilloma virus-associated head and neck squamous cell carcinoma? Ann Diagn Pathol. 2012;16:91–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Mattavelli D, Miceli R, Radaelli S, et al. Head and neck soft tissue sarcomas: prognostic factors and outcome in a series of patients treated at a single institution. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:2181–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Park JT, Roh JL, Kim SO, et al. Prognostic factors and oncological outcomes of 122 head and neck soft tissue sarcoma patients treated at a single institution. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:248–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. • Maxwell JH, Ferris RL, Gooding W, et al. Extracapsular spread in head and neck carcinoma: impact of site and human papillomavirus status. Cancer. 2013;119:3302–8. A single institution study showed differential impact of extranodal extension for cancer of oral cavity and oropharynx

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Myers JN, Greenberg JS, Mo V, Roberts D. Extracapsular spread. A significant predictor of treatment failure in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue. Cancer. 2001;92:3030–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bernier J, Cooper JS, Pajak TF, et al. Defining risk levels in locally advanced head and neck cancers: a comparative analysis of concurrent postoperative radiation plus chemotherapy trials of the EORTC (#22931) and RTOG (# 9501). Head Neck. 2005;27:843–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. • Mermod M, Tolstonog G, Simon C, Monnier Y. Extracapsular spread in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oral Oncol. 2016;62:60–71. A single institution study showed differential impact of extranodal extension for cancer of oral cavity and oropharynx

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Chai RL, Rath TJ, Johnson JT, et al. Accuracy of computed tomography in the prediction of extracapsular spread of lymph node metastases in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;139:1187–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Liu JT, Kann BH, De B, et al. Prognostic value of radiographic extracapsular extension in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell cancers. Oral Oncol. 2016;52:52–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Gregoire V, Ang K, Budach W, et al. Delineation of the neck node levels for head and neck tumors: a 2013 update. DAHANCA, EORTC, HKNPCSG, NCIC CTG, NCRI, RTOG, TROG consensus guidelines. Radiother Oncol. 2014;110:172–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. •• Pan JJ, Ng WT, Zong JF, et al. Proposal for the 8th edition of the AJCC/UICC staging system for nasopharyngeal cancer in the era of intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Cancer. 2016;122:546–58. A multicenter study proposed modified TNM classification for nasopharyngeal carcinoma which was adopted by 8th edition TNM

  40. Peng H, Guo R, Chen L, et al. Prognostic impact of plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated using intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Sci Rep. 2016;6:22000.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhang L, Tang LQ, Chen QY, et al. Plasma Epstein-Barr viral DNA complements TNM classification of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the era of intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Oncotarget. 2016;7:6221–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Lin JC, Wang WY, Chen KY, et al. Quantification of plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA in patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2461–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Leung SF, Chan AT, Zee B, et al. Pretherapy quantitative measurement of circulating Epstein-Barr virus DNA is predictive of posttherapy distant failure in patients with early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma of undifferentiated type. Cancer. 2003;98:288–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Sun P, Chen C, Cheng YK, et al. Serologic biomarkers of Epstein-Barr virus correlate with TNM classification according to the seventh edition of the UICC/AJCC staging system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;271:2545–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Guo R, Sun Y, Yu XL, et al. Is primary tumor volume still a prognostic factor in intensity modulated radiation therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma? Radiother Oncol. 2012;104:294–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Wu Z, Zeng RF, Su Y, et al. Prognostic significance of tumor volume in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma undergoing intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Head Neck. 2013;35:689–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Wu Z, Gu MF, Zeng RF, et al. Correlation between nasopharyngeal carcinoma tumor volume and the 2002 International Union Against Cancer tumor classification system. Radiat Oncol. 2013;8:87.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Mucke T, Kanatas A, Ritschl LM, et al. Tumor thickness and risk of lymph node metastasis in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue. Oral Oncol. 2016;53:80–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Pinto FR, de Matos LL, Palermo FC, et al. Tumor thickness as an independent risk factor of early recurrence in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;271:1747–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Huang SH, Hwang D, Lockwood G, et al. Predictive value of tumor thickness for cervical lymph-node involvement in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: a meta-analysis of reported studies. Cancer. 2009;115:1489–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. O'Brien CJ, Lauer CS, Fredricks S, et al. Tumor thickness influences prognosis of T1 and T2 oral cavity cancer—but what thickness? Head Neck. 2003;25:937–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. •• Ebrahimi A, Gil Z, Amit M, et al. Primary tumor staging for oral cancer and a proposed modification incorporating depth of invasion: an international multicenter retrospective study. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;140:1138–48. A large multicenter study demonstrated the importance of depth of invasion for oral cavity cancer and proposed the cutoff for T classification, which was adopted by 8th edition TNM

  53. Madana J, Laliberte F, Morand GB, et al. Computerized tomography based tumor-thickness measurement is useful to predict postoperative pathological tumor thickness in oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;44:49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Goel V, Parihar PS, Parihar A, et al. Accuracy of MRI in prediction of tumour thickness and nodal stage in oral tongue and gingivobuccal cancer with clinical correlation and staging. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10:TC01–5.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Schmults CD, Karia PS, Carter JB, et al. Factors predictive of recurrence and death from cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: a 10-year, single-institution cohort study. JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149:541–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Brantsch KD, Meisner C, Schonfisch B, et al. Analysis of risk factors determining prognosis of cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma: a prospective study. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:713–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Roozeboom MH, Lohman BG, Westers-Attema A, et al. Clinical and histological prognostic factors local recurrence and metastasis of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: analysis of a defined population. Acta Derm Venereol. 2013;93:417–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Clayman GL, Lee JJ, Holsinger FC, et al. Mortality risk from squamous cell skin cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:759–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Jambusaria-Pahlajani A, Kanetsky PA, Karia PS, et al. Evaluation of AJCC tumor staging for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and a proposed alternative tumor staging system. JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149:402–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian O’Sullivan MD.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Head and Neck Cancer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, S.H., O’Sullivan, B. Overview of the 8th Edition TNM Classification for Head and Neck Cancer. Curr. Treat. Options in Oncol. 18, 40 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-017-0484-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-017-0484-y

Keywords

Navigation