Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Watch and Wait: Is Surgery Always Necessary for Rectal Cancer?

  • Lower Gastrointestinal Cancers (AB Benson, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Opinion statement

Despite decades of high-quality research, the treatment of rectal cancer remains a work in progress. The interplay between chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery is under constant rearrangement and refinement. Through this all, the desire to preserve the anal sphincters and quality of life remains at the forefront. In the past decade, standard of care for stage II or III rectal cancers in the USA has been neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT) followed by radical surgical resection of the rectum. While timing and sequence of the CRT continues to evolve, surgical resection has remained essential in treatment. This stands in contrast to anal cancer, where surgery is reserved purely for salvage. This article describes a treatment strategy that attempts to treat rectal adenocarcinoma with CRT alone, reserving surgery for failure or salvage. Of the studies performed to date, a number are methodologically sound and show promise. However, the body of evidence has yet to reach a size to sway practitioners from the established trinity of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery. Interestingly, few trials administer post treatment full-dose systemic chemotherapy, which is the standard of care in patients undergoing surgical resection. Better identification of patients that will have complete cure from this approach, combined with long-term outcome data on salvage patients, is necessary for this therapy to be universally embraced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References and Recommended Reading

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as:• Of importance•• Of major importance

  1. Guren MG, Eriksen MT, Wiig JN, et al. Quality of life and functional outcome following anterior or abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2005;31(7):735–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fazio VW, Zutshi M, Remzi FH, et al. A randomized multicenter trial to compare long-term functional outcome, quality of life, and complications of surgical procedures for low rectal cancers. Ann Surg. 2007;246(3):481–8. discussion 488–90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W, et al. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(17):1731–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Glynne-Jones R, Harrison M, Hughes R. Challenges in the neoadjuvant treatment of rectal cancer: balancing the risk of recurrence and quality of life. Cancer Radiother. 2013;17(7):675–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Benson 3rd AB, Venook AP, Bekaii-Saab T, et al. Rectal cancer, version 2.2015. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2015;13(6):719–28. Guidelines for the care of rectal adenocarcinoma as put forth by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bipat S, Glas AS, Slors FJ, Zwinderman AH, Bossuyt PM, Stoker J. Rectal cancer: local staging and assessment of lymph node involvement with endoluminal US, CT, and MR imaging—a meta-analysis. Radiology. 2004;232(3):773–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fernandez-Esparrach G, Ayuso-Colella JR, Sendino O, et al. EUS and magnetic resonance imaging in the staging of rectal cancer: a prospective and comparative study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74(2):347–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Patel UB, Taylor F, Blomqvist L, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging-detected tumor response for locally advanced rectal cancer predicts survival outcomes: MERCURY experience. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(28):3753–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bosset JF, Calais G, Mineur L, et al. Enhanced tumorocidal effect of chemotherapy with preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer: preliminary results—EORTC 22921. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(24):5620–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sanghera P, Wong DW, McConkey CC, Geh JI, Hartley A. Chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: an updated analysis of factors affecting pathological response. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2008;20(2):176–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Radu C, Berglund A, Pahlman L, Glimelius B. Short-course preoperative radiotherapy with delayed surgery in rectal cancer—a retrospective study. Radiother Oncol. 2008;87(3):343–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Appelt AL, Ploen J, Harling H, et al. High-dose chemoradiotherapy and watchful waiting for distal rectal cancer: a prospective observational study. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(8):919–27. Prospective observational trial that supports the concept that WAW strategy may be a safe alternative to standard treatment, with excellent functional outcome.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schrag D, Weiser MR, Goodman KA, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy without routine use of radiation therapy for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: a pilot trial. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(6):513–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Janjan NA, Khoo VS, Abbruzzese J, et al. Tumor downstaging and sphincter preservation with preoperative chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer: the M. D. Anderson cancer center experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999;44(5):1027–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pucciarelli S, Toppan P, Friso ML, et al. Complete pathologic response following preoperative chemoradiation therapy for middle to lower rectal cancer is not a prognostic factor for a better outcome. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47(11):1798–807.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zorcolo L, Rosman AS, Restivo A, et al. Complete pathologic response after combined modality treatment for rectal cancer and long-term survival: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(9):2822–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Maas M, Nelemans PJ, Valentini V, et al. Long-term outcome in patients with a pathological complete response after chemoradiation for rectal cancer: a pooled analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11(9):835–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Moore HG, Gittleman AE, Minsky BD, et al. Rate of pathologic complete response with increased interval between preoperative combined modality therapy and rectal cancer resection. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47(3):279–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tulchinsky H, Shmueli E, Figer A, Klausner JM, Rabau M. An interval >7 weeks between neoadjuvant therapy and surgery improves pathologic complete response and disease-free survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(10):2661–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Garcia-Aguilar J, Smith DD, Avila K, et al. Optimal timing of surgery after chemoradiation for advanced rectal cancer: preliminary results of a multicenter, nonrandomized phase II prospective trial. Ann Surg. 2011;254(1):97–102.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Evans J, Tait D, Swift I, et al. Timing of surgery following preoperative therapy in rectal cancer: the need for a prospective randomized trial? Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54(10):1251–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Perez RO, Habr-Gama A, Gama-Rodrigues J, et al. Accuracy of positron emission tomography/computed tomography and clinical assessment in the detection of complete rectal tumor regression after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: long-term results of a prospective trial (national clinical trial 00254683). Cancer. 2012;118(14):3501–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Habr-Gama A, Perez RO, Wynn G, Marks J, Kessler H, Gama-Rodrigues J. Complete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy for distal rectal cancer: characterization of clinical and endoscopic findings for standardization. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53(12):1692–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Smith FM, Wiland H, Mace A, Pai RK, Kalady MF. Clinical criteria underestimate complete pathological response in rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014;57(3):311–5. Retrospective study that raises questions about accuracy of cCR to predict pCR.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Duldulao MP, Lee W, Streja L, et al. Distribution of residual cancer cells in the bowel wall after neoadjuvant chemoradiation in patients with rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56(2):142–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Perez RO, Habr-Gama A, Pereira GV, et al. Role of biopsies in patients with residual rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation after downsizing: can they rule out persisting cancer? Colorectal Dis. 2012;14(6):714–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lambregts DM, Vandecaveye V, Barbaro B, et al. Diffusion-weighted MRI for selection of complete responders after chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(8):2224–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Martellucci J, Scheiterle M, Lorenzi B, et al. Accuracy of transrectal ultrasound after preoperative radiochemotherapy compared to computed tomography and magnetic resonance in locally advanced rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012;27(7):967–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Habr-Gama A, Sao Juliao GP, Perez RO. Nonoperative management of rectal cancer: identifying the ideal patients. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2015;29(1):135–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Habr-Gama A, Gama-Rodrigues J, Sao Juliao GP, et al. Local recurrence after complete clinical response and watch and wait in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: impact of salvage therapy on local disease control. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;88(4):822–8. Local recurrence developed in 31% of patients with cCR. Salvage therapy is feasible in the majority of patients and is associated with good long-term local control of disease.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Habr-Gama A, Perez RO, Nadalin W, et al. Operative versus nonoperative treatment for stage 0 distal rectal cancer following chemoradiation therapy: long-term results. Ann Surg. 2004;240(4):711–7. discussion 717–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Habr-Gama A, Sabbaga J, Gama-Rodrigues J, et al. Watch and wait approach following extended neoadjuvant chemoradiation for distal rectal cancer: are we getting closer to anal cancer management? Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56(10):1109–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lim L, Chao M, Shapiro J, et al. Long-term outcomes of patients with localized rectal cancer treated with chemoradiation or radiotherapy alone because of medical inoperability or patient refusal. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50(12):2032–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hughes R, Harrison M, Glynne-Jones R. Could a wait and see policy be justified in T3/4 rectal cancers after chemo-radiotherapy? Acta Oncol. 2010;49(3):378–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Dalton RS, Velineni R, Osborne ME, et al. A single-centre experience of chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: is there potential for nonoperative management? Colorectal Dis. 2012;14(5):567–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Maas M, Beets-Tan RG, Lambregts DM, et al. Wait-and-see policy for clinical complete responders after chemoradiation for rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(35):4633–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Smith JD, Ruby JA, Goodman KA, et al. Nonoperative management of rectal cancer with complete clinical response after neoadjuvant therapy. Ann Surg. 2012;256(6):965–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Araujo RO, Valadao M, Borges D, et al. Nonoperative management of rectal cancer after chemoradiation opposed to resection after complete clinical response. A comparative study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015;41(11):1456–63. Retrospective study that compared WAW patients with cCR with surgical patients that had pCR. They found similar overall survival between the two groups, but the WAW group had a higher recurrence rate.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Renehan AG, Malcomson L, Emsley R, et al. Watch-and-wait approach versus surgical resection after chemoradiotherapy for patients with rectal cancer (the OnCoRe project): a propensity-score matched cohort analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2015. A propensity score matched cohort analysis that showed similar rates of overall survival and disease-free survival between surgical resection and WAW with better colostomy-free survival seen in the WAW group.

  40. Watanabe T, Kobunai T, Akiyoshi T, Matsuda K, Ishihara S, Nozawa K. Prediction of response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer by using reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction analysis of four genes. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014;57(1):23–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Garcia-Aguilar J, Chow OS, Smith DD, et al. Effect of adding mFOLFOX6 after neoadjuvant chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(8):957–66. Non-randomized trial comparing four sequential study groups of patients with stage II–III locally advanced rectal cancer treated with increasing cycles of mFOLFOX6. Delivery of mFOLFOX6 after CRT and before TME has the potential to increase the proportion of patients eligible for less invasive treatment strategies.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Myerson RJ, Tan B, Hunt S, et al. Five fractions of radiation therapy followed by 4 cycles of FOLFOX chemotherapy as preoperative treatment for rectal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;88(4):829–36. Short-course radiation and FOLFOX achieved response and morbidity rates that compare favorably with those of conventionally fractionated radiation therapy and concurrent chemotherapy.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Smith JJ, Chow OS, Gollub MJ, et al. Organ preservation in rectal adenocarcinoma: a phase II randomized controlled trial evaluating 3-year disease-free survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with chemoradiation plus induction or consolidation chemotherapy, and total mesorectal excision or nonoperative management. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:767-015-1632-z.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Avenue, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA

    Alexander T. Hawkins MD, MPH & Steven R. Hunt MD

Authors
  1. Alexander T. Hawkins MD, MPH
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Steven R. Hunt MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven R. Hunt MD.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights and informed consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Lower Gastrointestinal Cancers

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hawkins, A.T., Hunt, S.R. Watch and Wait: Is Surgery Always Necessary for Rectal Cancer?. Curr. Treat. Options in Oncol. 17, 22 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-016-0398-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-016-0398-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation