Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Chemotherapy for Nasopharyngeal Cancer: Neoadjuvant, Concomitant, and/or Adjuvant

  • Head and Neck Cancer (J-P Machiels, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Opinion Statement

Nasopharyngeal cancers are unique among other head and neck cancers, not only in epidemiology and histological characteristics, but also on treatment strategies as well. Radiotherapy is the primary treatment due to its radiosensitivity. In locally advanced stages, concurrent chemoradiation has been established to be effective to eradicate the disease and improve survival, in favor of radiotherapy alone. While increasing studies have explored the potential benefit of adding more chemotherapy to the concurrent regimen, whether adjuvant or neoadjuvant, it is generally agreed that proper patient selection is needed to stratify high-risk groups to intensify treatment and to optimize the disease outcome. Future studies are ongoing, possibly with the addition of biomarkers such as EBV DNA for risk group stratification. Refinement of patient groups that should be selected for combined modality treatment in stage II disease is also warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Al-Sarraf M, LeBlanc M, Giri PG, et al. Chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy in patients with advanced nasopharyngeal cancer: phase III randomized Intergroup study 0099. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:1310–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Al-Sarraf M, LeBlanc M, Giri PG, et al. Superiority of five year survival with chemoradiotherapy (CT-radiotherapy) vs radiotherapy in patients (Pts) with locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC). Intergroup (0099) (SWOG 8892, RTOG 8817, ECOG 2388) phase III study: final report. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 20; Abstract 905.

  3. Wee J, Tan EH, Tai BC, et al. Randomized trial of radiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union against cancer stage III and IV nasopharyngeal cancer of the endemic variety. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:6730–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wee J. 4th FY Khoo memorial lecture 2008: nasopharyngeal cancer workgroup—the past, the present and the future. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2008;37:606–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee AW, Tung SY, Ngan RK, et al. Factors contributing to the efficacy of concurrent-adjuvant chemotherapy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: combined analyses of NPC-9901 and NPC-9902 Trials. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47(5):656–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Blanchard P, Lee A, Marguet S, Leclercq J, Ng WT, Ma J, et al. Meta-analysis of chemotherapy in nasopharynx carcinoma (MAC-NPC): an update on 19 trials and 4,806 patients. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(6):645–55. This updated meta-analysis, with a median follow-up of 7.7 years, is the first analysis to demonstrate the treatment effect of concomitant with or without adjuvant chemotherapy as distinct groups.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen Y, Sun Y, Liang SB, et al. Progress report of a randomized trial comparing long-term survival and late toxicity of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with adjuvant chemotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in patients with stage III to IVB nasopharyngeal carcinoma from endemic regions of China. Cancer. 2013;119:2230–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wu X, Huang PY, Peng PJ, et al. Long-term follow-up of a phase III study comparing radiotherapy with or without weekly oxaliplatin for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:2131–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chan AT, Leung SF, Ngan RK, et al. Overall survival after concurrent cisplatin-radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:536–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lin JC, Jan JS, Hsu CY, et al. Phase III study of concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: positive effect on overall and progression-free survival. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:631–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kwong DL, Sham JS, Au GK, et al. Concurrent and adjuvant chemotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a factorial study. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:2643–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Adelstein DJ, Li Y, Adams GL, et al. An intergroup phase III comparison of standard radiation therapy and two schedules of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with unresectable squamous cell head and neck cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:92–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Baujat B, Audry H, Bourhis J, et al. Chemotherapy in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an individual patient data meta-analysis of eight randomized trials and 1753 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;64:47–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen Y, Liu MZ, Liang SB, et al. Preliminary results of a prospective randomized trial comparing concurrent chemoradiotherapy plus adjuvant chemotherapy with radiotherapy alone in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma in endemic regions of china. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;71:1356–64. This prospective randomized trial demonstrated superior outcome for NPC patient treatment with concurrent chemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone, with significant improved 2-year OS, failure-free rate, and distant failure-free survival.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen L, Hu CS, Chen XZ, et al. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy plus adjuvant chemotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a phase 3 multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:163–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. What is the best treatment in nasopharyngeal carcinoma? An individual patient data network meta-analysis. Radiother Oncol. 2015; 114 (suppl 1; abstr OC003).

  17. Liu N, Chen NY, Cui RX, et al. Prognostic value of a microRNA signature in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a microRNA expression analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:633–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang HY, Sun BY, Zhu ZH, et al. Eight-signature classifier for prediction of nasopharyngeal [corrected] carcinoma survival. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:4516–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hui EP, Ma BB, Leung SF, et al. Randomized phase II trial of concurrent cisplatin-radiotherapy with or without neoadjuvant docetaxel and cisplatin in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:242–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fountzilas G, Ciuleanu E, Bobos M, et al. Induction chemotherapy followed by concomitant radiotherapy and weekly cisplatin versus the same concomitant chemoradiotherapy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a randomized phase II study conducted by the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG) with biomarker evaluation. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:427–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tan T, Lim WT, Fong KW, et al. Concurrent chemo-radiation with or without induction gemcitabine, carboplatin, and paclitaxel: a randomized, phase 2/3 trial in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015;91:952–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee AW, Ngan RK, Tung SY, et al. Preliminary results of trial NPC-0501 evaluating the therapeutic gain by changing from concurrent-adjuvant to induction-concurrent chemoradiotherapy, changing from fluorouracil to capecitabine, and changing from conventional to accelerated radiotherapy fractionation in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer. 2015;121:1328–38. This six-arm randomized phase 3 trial conducted by the Hong Kong Nasopharyngeal Cancer Study Group showed improvement of outcome using induction PX (cisplatin and capecitabine); adjusted comparison of induction PX versus induction or adjuvant PF demonstrated lower hazard ratio of death or progression and less toxicity.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Daoud J, Aupérin A, Tao YG, et al. A randomized trial of concomitant cisplatin-RT +/− induction TPF in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinomas. Radiother Oncol. 2015;114 Supp. 1 Abstract OC-004.

  24. Sun Y, Chen NY, Zhang N, Hu GQ. Induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in locoregional advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: preliminary results of a phase 3 multicentre randomized controlled trial. The Croucher Foundation Advanced Study Institute–Advances in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Studies. 2014.

  25. Chua DT, Ma J, Sham JS, et al. Improvement of survival after addition of induction chemotherapy to radiotherapy in patients with early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma: subgroup analysis of two phase III trials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;65:1300–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Song CH, Wu HG, Heo DS, et al. Treatment outcomes for radiotherapy alone are comparable with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy in early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Laryngoscope. 2008;118:663–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Cheng SH, Tsai SY, Yen KL, et al. Concomitant radiotherapy and chemotherapy for early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:2040–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Chen QY, Wen YF, Guo L, et al. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy vs radiotherapy alone in stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma: phase III randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103:1761–70. This randomized study demonstrates benefit of concurrent chemoradiation in stage II nasopharyngeal cancer patients, with significant improvement in 5-year OS, PFS, and distant metastasis-free survival.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Loong HH, Ma BB, Leung SF, et al. Prognostic significance of the total dose of cisplatin administered during concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Radiother Oncol. 2012;104:300–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee AW, Ng WT, Chan LL, et al. Evolution of treatment for nasopharyngeal cancer—success and setback in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy era. Radiother Oncol. 2014;110:377–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Su SF, Han F, Zhao C, et al. Long-term outcomes of early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy alone. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;82:327–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Xiao WW, Han F, Lu TX, et al. Treatment outcomes after radiotherapy alone for patients with early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;74:1070–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Chua DT, Sham JS, Kwong DL, et al. Treatment outcome after radiotherapy alone for patients with stage I-II nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer. 2003;98:74–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ng WT, Yuen KT, Au KH, et al. Staging of nasopharyngeal carcinoma—the past, the present and the future. Oral Oncol. 2014;50:549–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Leung SF, Chan AT, Zee B, et al. Pretherapy quantitative measurement of circulating Epstein-Barr virus DNA is predictive of posttherapy distant failure in patients with early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma of undifferentiated type. Cancer. 2003;98:288–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

Conflict of Interest

Wai Tong Ng, Amy T.Y. Chang, Sarah W.M. Lee, Henry C.K. Sze, and Anne W.M. Lee declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Clinical Oncology, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Chai Wan, Hong Kong

    Wai Tong Ng MD, Amy T. Y. Chang F.R.C.R. & Sarah W. M. Lee F.R.C.R.

  2. Clinical Oncology Center, University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, 1 Haiyuan First Road, Futian District, Shenzhen, 518053, Guangdong Province, China

    Henry C. K. Sze F.R.C.R. & Anne W. M. Lee MD

Authors
  1. Wai Tong Ng MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Amy T. Y. Chang F.R.C.R.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sarah W. M. Lee F.R.C.R.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Henry C. K. Sze F.R.C.R.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Anne W. M. Lee MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne W. M. Lee MD.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Head and Neck Cancer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ng, W.T., Chang, A.T.Y., Lee, S.W.M. et al. Chemotherapy for Nasopharyngeal Cancer: Neoadjuvant, Concomitant, and/or Adjuvant. Curr. Treat. Options in Oncol. 16, 44 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-015-0361-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-015-0361-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation