Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Systemic Treatment Options for Radiation-Associated Sarcomas

  • Sarcoma (SH Okuno, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Opinion statement

Sarcomas are rare malignant tumors that develop from mesenchymal tissue. Most sarcomas are idiopathic, however, a significant minority develops as a consequence of prior radiation exposure. Although the absolute risk of developing a radiation-associated sarcoma is small, these tumors represent significant clinical challenges. For recurrent, unresectable or metastatic disease, the standard treatment is systemic chemotherapy. Radiation-associated sarcomas tend to be undifferentiated sarcomas, angiosarcomas, or leiomyosarcomas, which are variably sensitive to chemotherapy. The best general approach is to treat each radiation-associated sarcoma as one would its sporadic histologic counterpart. There are limited data to guide the best treatment for radiation-associated sarcoma, therefore, the standard chemotherapy options are reasonable choices. These include doxorubicin, ifosfamide, gemcitabine, docetaxel, and pazopanib. Patients with radiation-associated sarcomas may have received prior anthracyclines to treat antecedent malignancies such as breast cancer or lymphoma. Thus, if additional doxorubicin cannot be used, liposomal doxorubicin is a reasonable substitute. More prospective research is needed on how radiation-associated sarcomas respond to systemic therapy. Future clinical trials of new agents in sarcoma should identify and include patients with radiation-associated sarcoma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64:9–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Amendola BE, Amendola MA, McClatchey KD, Miller Jr CH. Radiation-associated sarcoma: a review of 23 patients with postradiation sarcoma over a 50-year period. Am J Clin Oncol. 1989;12:411–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brady MS, Gaynor JJ, Brennan MF. Radiation-associated sarcoma of bone and soft tissue. Arch Surg (Chic Ill: 1960). 1992;127:1379–85.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cha C, Antonescu CR, Quan ML, Maru S, Brennan MF. Long-term results with resection of radiation-induced soft tissue sarcomas. Ann Surg. 2004;239:903–9. discussion 9–10.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Riad S, Biau D, Holt GE, Werier J, Turcotte RE, Ferguson PC, et al. The clinical and functional outcome for patients with radiation-induced soft tissue sarcoma. Cancer. 2012;118:2682–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Taylor BS, Barretina J, Maki RG, Antonescu CR, Singer S, Ladanyi M. Advances in sarcoma genomics and new therapeutic targets. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11:541–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Judson I, Verweij J, Gelderblom H, Hartmann JT, Schoffski P, Blay JY, et al. Doxorubicin alone versus intensified doxorubicin plus ifosfamide for first-line treatment of advanced or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma: a randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:415–23. Pivotal trial that demonstrates no survival advantage to combination chemotherapy with doxorubicin and ifosfamide versus doxorubicin alone, although response rates are higher with combination therapy.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Judson I, Radford JA, Harris M, Blay JY, van Hoesel Q, le Cesne A, et al. Randomised phase II trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (DOXIL/CAELYX) versus doxorubicin in the treatment of advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma: a study by the EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group. Eur J Cancer. 2001;37:870–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Maki RG, Wathen JK, Patel SR, Priebat DA, Okuno SH, Samuels B, et al. Randomized phase II study of gemcitabine and docetaxel compared with gemcitabine alone in patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcomas: results of sarcoma alliance for research through collaboration study 002 [corrected]. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:2755–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pautier P, Floquet A, Penel N, Piperno-Neumann S, Isambert N, Rey A, et al. Randomized multicenter and stratified phase II study of gemcitabine alone versus gemcitabine and docetaxel in patients with metastatic or relapsed leiomyosarcomas: a Federation Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer (FNCLCC) French Sarcoma Group Study (TAXOGEM study). Oncologist. 2012;17:1213–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dileo P, Morgan JA, Zahrieh D, Desai J, Salesi JM, Harmon DC, et al. Gemcitabine and vinorelbine combination chemotherapy for patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas: results of a phase II trial. Cancer. 2007;109:1863–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Garcia-Del-Muro X, Lopez-Pousa A, Maurel J, Martin J, Martinez-Trufero J, Casado A, et al. Randomized phase II study comparing gemcitabine plus dacarbazine versus dacarbazine alone in patients with previously treated soft tissue sarcoma: a Spanish Group for Research on Sarcomas study. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:2528–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bacci G, Longhi A, Forni C, Fabbri N, Briccoli A, Barbieri E, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for radioinduced osteosarcoma of the extremity: the Rizzoli experience in 20 cases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;67:505–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. D’Angelo SP, Antonescu CR, Kuk D, Qin L, Moraco N, Carvajal RC, et al. High-risk features in radiation-associated breast angiosarcomas. Br J Cancer. 2013;109:2340–6. Largest published series of radiation-associated breast angiosarcoma.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Agulnik M, Yarber JL, Okuno SH, von Mehren M, Jovanovic BD, Brockstein BE, et al. An open-label, multicenter, phase II study of bevacizumab for the treatment of angiosarcoma and epithelioid hemangioendotheliomas. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:257–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Maki RG, D’Adamo DR, Keohan ML, Saulle M, Schuetze SM, Undevia SD, et al. Phase II study of sorafenib in patients with metastatic or recurrent sarcomas. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:3133–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Santoro A, Comandone A, Basso U, Soto Parra H, De Sanctis R, Stroppa E, et al. Phase II prospective study with sorafenib in advanced soft tissue sarcomas after anthracycline-based therapy. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:1093–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Penel N, Bui BN, Bay JO, Cupissol D, Ray-Coquard I, Piperno-Neumann S, et al. Phase II trial of weekly paclitaxel for unresectable angiosarcoma: the ANGIOTAX Study. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:5269–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sleijfer S, Ray-Coquard I, Papai Z, Le Cesne A, Scurr M, Schoffski P, et al. Pazopanib, a multikinase angiogenesis inhibitor, in patients with relapsed or refractory advanced soft tissue sarcoma: a phase II study from the European organisation for research and treatment of cancer-soft tissue and bone sarcoma group (EORTC study 62043). J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:3126–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. van der Graaf WT, Blay JY, Chawla SP, Kim DW, Bui-Nguyen B, Casali PG, et al. Pazopanib for metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma (PALETTE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2012;379:1879–86. Pivotal study that led to regulatory approval of pazopanib for soft-tissue sarcoma.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Demetri GD, Chawla SP, von Mehren M, Ritch P, Baker LH, Blay JY, et al. Efficacy and safety of trabectedin in patients with advanced or metastatic liposarcoma or leiomyosarcoma after failure of prior anthracyclines and ifosfamide: results of a randomized phase II study of two different schedules. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4188–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

Conflict of Interest

Mark A. Dickson declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark A. Dickson MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dickson, M.A. Systemic Treatment Options for Radiation-Associated Sarcomas. Curr. Treat. Options in Oncol. 15, 476–481 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-014-0299-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-014-0299-z

Keywords

Navigation