Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Issues related to choice of breast reconstruction in early-stage breast cancer

  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Opinion statement

Reconstructive surgeons focus their efforts on refining and developing techniques that optimize oncologic outcome and recreate the most natural breast mound possible. The introduction of perforator flaps offers the potential for faster and more complete recovery, while increasing technical complexity and the risks associated with microsurgical reconstruction. Despite appealing long-lasting results, autologous reconstruction is not the ideal reconstructive choice for every patient. Tissue/expander reconstruction can produce a satisfactory aesthetic outcome and is the reconstruction of choice for most women undergoing breast reconstruction. Immediate autologous reconstruction at the time of mastectomy best resembles the lost breast and favorably withstands radiation, compared with other reconstructive methods. However, the best method for integrating reconstruction and radiation is being actively debated. Placing a tissue expander at the time of mastectomy allows a skin-sparing approach and gives the patient a chance to see how she will feel with an implant. This approach avoids radiation damage to tissue reconstruction flaps, saving them for use later if necessary. This approach, using a tissue expander as a first step, is growing in popularity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Kat CC, Darcy CM, O’Donoghue JM, et al.: The use of the latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap for immediate correction of the deformity resulting from breast conservation surgery. Br J Plast Surg 1999, 52:99–103.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Munhoz AM, Montag E, Fels KW, et al.: Outcome analysis of breast-conservation surgery and immediate latissimus dorsi flap reconstruction in patients with T1 to T2 breast cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005, 116:741–752.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cunnick GH, Mokbel K: Skin-sparing mastectomy. Am J Surg 2004, 188:78–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al.: Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002, 347:1233–1241.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Frassica DA, Zellars R: Radiation oncology: the year in review. Curr Opin Oncol 2002, 14:594–599.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Overgaard M, Jensen MB, Overgaard J, et al.: Postoperative radiotherapy in high-risk postmenopausal breastcancer patients given adjuvant tamoxifen: Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group DBCG 82c randomized trial. Lancet, 1999, 353:1641–1648.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Spear SL, Pelletiere CV: Immediate breast reconstruction in two stages using textured, integrated-valve tissue expanders and breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004, 113:2098–2103. This article is an excellent example of how plastic surgeons must improve reconstruction options and techniques in response to changing treatment trends in breast cancer.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chang DW, Youssef A, Cha S, Reece GP: Autologous breast reconstruction with the extended latissimus dorsi flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002, 110:751–759; discussion 760–761.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Allen RJ, Heitmann C: Perforator flaps--the history of evolution. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2002, 34:216–218.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Thacker PD: Fake worlds offer real medicine: virtual reality finding a role in treatment and training. JAMA 2003, 290:2107–2112.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cunningham BL, Lokeh A, Gutowski KA: Saline-filled breast implant safety and efficacy: a multicenter retrospective review. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000, 105:2143–2149; discussion 2150–2151.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Spear SL, Spittler CJ: Breast reconstruction with implants and expanders. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001, 107:177–187; quiz 188.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Larson DL, Yousif NJ, Sinha RK, et al.: A comparison of pedicled and free TRAM flaps for breast reconstruction in a single institution. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999, 104:674–680.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Menke H, Erkens M, Olbrisch RR: Evolving concepts in breast reconstruction with latissimus dorsi flaps: results and follow-up of 121 consecutive patients. Ann Plast Surg 2001, 47:107–114.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Guerra AB, Metzinger SE, Bidros RS, et al.: Breast reconstruction with gluteal artery perforator (GAP) flaps: a critical analysis of 142 cases. Ann Plast Surg 2004, 52:118–125.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gill PS, Hunt JP, Guerra AB, et al.: A 10-year retrospective review of 758 DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004, 113:1153–1160.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Taylor CW, Horgan K, Dockwell D: Oncological aspects of breast reconstruction. Breast 2005, 14:118–130.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. de la Torre JI, Fix RJ, Gardner PM, Vasconez LO: Reconstruction with the latissimus dorsi flap after skinsparing mastectomy. Ann Plast Surg 2001, 46:229–233.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kroll SS, Khoo A, Singletary SE, et al.: Local recurrence risk after skin-sparing and conventional mastectomy: a 6-year follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999, 104:421–425.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Toth BA, Forley BG, Calabria R: Retrospective study of the skin-sparing mastectomy in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999, 104:77–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Al-Ghazal SK, Sully L, Fallowfield L, Blamey RW:The psychological impact of immediate rather than delayed breast reconstruction. Eur J Surg Oncol 2000, 26:17–19.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. DeBono R, Thompson A, Stevenson JH: Immediate versus delayed free TRAM breast reconstruction: an analysis of perioperative factors and complications. Br J Plast Surg 2002, 55:111–116.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kronowitz SJ, Robb GL: Breast reconstruction with postmastectomy radiation therapy: current issues. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004, 114:950–960. This is an excellent review from a large center (MD Anderson Cancer Center). The suggestion to deflate implants before radiation or remove them after pathology results are available and proceed with more surgery before hospital discharge is very institution specific; most would leave the implant until after other treatments have been completed.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hodgson EL, Malata CM: Implant-based breast reconstruction following mastectomy. Breast Dis 2002, 16:47–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Krueger EA, Wilkins EG, Strawderman M, et al.:Complications and patient satisfaction following expander/implant breast reconstruction with and without radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001, 49:713–721.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. SpearSL, Onyewu C: Staged breast reconstruction with saline-filled implants in the irradiated breast: recent trends and therapeutic implications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000, 105:930–942. The conclusion here (50% of radiated implants will need flap surgery or removal) seems to be the best estimate.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Clough KB, O’Donoghue JM, Fitoussi AD, et al.:Prospective evaluation of late cosmetic results following breast reconstruction: I. Implant reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001, 107:1702–1709.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Erdmann D, Sundin BM, Moquin KJ, et al.: Delay in unipedicled TRAM flap reconstruction of the breast: a review of 76 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002, 110:762–767.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Clough KB, O’Donoghue JM, Fitoussi AD, et al.:Prospective evaluation of late cosmetic results following breast reconstruction: II. Tram flap reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001, 107:1710–1716.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Kroll SS, Gherardini G, Martin JE, et al.: Fat necrosis in free and pedicled TRAM flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998, 102:1502–1507.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Nahabedian MY, Manson PN: Contour abnormalities of the abdomen after transverse rectus abdominis muscle flap breast reconstruction: a multifactorial analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002, 109:81–87 ; discussion 88–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Alderman AK, Wilkins EG, Kim MH, Lowery JC:Complications in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: two-year results of the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002, 109:2265–2674. This paper, along with others from this group of authors, uses prospective multicenter data and therefore offers added credibility to their conclusions.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Pomel C, Missana MC, Atallah D, Lasser P: Endoscopic muscular latissimus dorsi flap harvesting for immediate breast reconstruction after skin sparing mastectomy. Eur J Surg Oncol 2003, 29:127–131.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Aitken ME, Mustoe TA: Why change a good thing? Revisiting the fleur-de-lis reconstruction of the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002, 109:525–533; discussion 534–538.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Clough KB, Louis-Sylvestre C, Fitoussi A, et al.: Donor site sequelae after autologous breast reconstruction with an extended latissimus dorsi flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002, 109:1904–1911.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Geddes CR, Morris SF, Neligan PC: Perforator flaps: evolution, classification, and applications. Ann Plast Surg 2003, 50:90–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Nahabedian MY, Momen B, Galdino G, Manson PN: Breast reconstruction with the free TRAM or DIEP flap: patient selection, choice of flap, and outcome. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002, 110:466–475; discussion 476–477.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kroll SS: Fat necrosis in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous and deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000, 106:576–583. This paper reports on the problems of limited blood flow with large flaps and points out the limitations inherent in perforator surgery.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Blondeel PN: One hundred free DIEP flap breast reconstructions: a personal experience. Br J Plast Surg 1999, 52:104–111.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Kroll SS, Reece GP, Miller MJ, et al.: Comparison of cost for DIEP and free TRAM flap breast reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001, 107:1413–1416; discussion 1417–1418.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Shaikh-Naidu N, Preminger BA, Rogers K, et al.: Determinants of aesthetic satisfaction following TRAM and implant breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2004, 52:465–470; discussion 470.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Osborne CK, Knight WA 3rd, Yochmowitz MG, McGuire WL: Modern approaches to the treatment of breast cancer. Blood 1980, 56:745–752.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Caffo O, Cazzolli D, Scalet A, et al.: Concurrent adjuvant chemotherapy and immediate breast reconstruction with skin expanders after mastectomy for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2000, 60:267–275.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Allweis TM, Boisvert ME, Otero SE, et al.: Immediate reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer does not prolong the time to starting adjuvant chemotherapy. Am J Surg 2002, 183:218–221. An important issue, reconstruction does not delay adjuvant chemotherapy.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Taylor CW, Kumar S: The effect of immediate breast reconstruction on adjuvant chemotherapy. Breast 2005, 14:18–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Gouy S, Rouzier R, Missana MC, et al.: Immediate reconstruction after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: effect on adjuvant treatment starting and survival. Ann Surg Oncol 2005, 12:161–166.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Tran NV, Evans GR, Kroll SS, et al.: Postoperative adjuvant irradiation: effects on tranverse rectus abdominis muscle flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000, 106:313–317; discussion 318–320. Describes the unpredictable effect of radiation on TRAM flaps.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Vandeweyer E, Deraemaecker R: Radiation therapy after immediate breast reconstruction with implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000, 106:56–58; discussion 59–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Van Diest PJ, Torrenga H, Borgstein PJ, et al.: Reliability of intraoperative frozen section and imprint cytological investigation of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer. Histopathology 1999, 35:14–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Cordeiro PG, Pusic AL, Disa JJ, et al.: Irradiation after immediate tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction: outcomes, complications, aesthetic results, and satisfaction among 156 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004, 113:877–881. The results shown here for implants and radiation have not been replicated in other centers, but their large experience supports the idea that implants and radiation may be acceptable for many women.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Spear SL, Ducic I, Low M, Cuoco F: The effect of radiation on pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction: outcomes and implications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005, 115:84–95.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Disa JJ, Cordeiro PG, Heerdt AH, et al.: Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate autologous tissue reconstruction after whole-breast irradiation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003, 111:118–124.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Langstein HN, Cheng MH, Singletary SE, et al.: Breast cancer recurrence after immediate reconstruction: patterns and significance. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003, 111:712–720; discussion 721–722.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Chawla AK, Kachnic LA, Taghian AG, et al.: Radiotherapy and breast reconstruction: complications and cosmesis with TRAM versus tissue expander/implant. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2002, 54:520–526.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Lipworth L, Tarone RE, McLaughlin JK: Silicone breast implants and connective tissue disease: an updated review of the epidemiologic evidence. Ann Plast Surg 2004, 52:598–601.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Janowsky EC, Kupper LL, Hulka BS: Meta-analyses of the relation between silicone breast implants and the risk of connective-tissue diseases. N Engl J Med 2000, 342:781–790. Study shows no evidence of a link between measurable disease and silicone breast implants.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Baroody M, Tameo MN, Dabb RW: Efficacy of the pain pump catheter in immediate autologous breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004, 114:895–898; discussion 899–900.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Lu L, Fine NA: The efficacy of continuous local anesthetic infiltration in breast surgery: reduction mammaplasty and reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005, 115:1927–1934; discussion 1935–1936. Local anesthetic “pain” pumps are gaining popularity as a method to decrease pain in all surgical disciplines.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Yap LH, Whiten SC, Forster A, Stevenson HJ: Sensory recovery in the sensate free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005, 115:1280–1288.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Blondeel PN, Demuynck M, Mete D, et al.: Sensory nerve repair in perforator flaps for autologous breast reconstruction: sensational or senseless? Br J Plast Surg 1999, 52:37–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Yano K, Hosokawa K, Takagi S, et al.: Breast reconstruction using the sensate latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002, 109:1897–1902; discussion 1903.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Northwestern Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 675 North St. Clair Street, 19th floor, 60611, Chicago, IL, USA

    Neil Fine MD

Authors
  1. Kristina O’Shaughnessy MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Neil Fine MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O’Shaughnessy, K., Fine, N. Issues related to choice of breast reconstruction in early-stage breast cancer. Curr. Treat. Options in Oncol. 7, 129–139 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-006-0048-z

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-006-0048-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation