Skip to main content
Log in

Sentinel node dissection in vulvar cancer

  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Opinion statement

Vulvar cancer is an uncommon but devastating disease. In addition to radical vulvectomy, most patients require inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy, which often results in wound infection, wound breakdown, and chronic lymphedema. In the past, the gold standard for early lesions was radical vulvectomy with complete bilateral inguinal-femoral lymphadenectomy. This resulted in a low rate of recurrence but devastating disfigurement and high complication rates. Because only approximately 20% of patients with vulvar cancer have positive lymph nodes upon presentation, the traditional approach of inguinal-femoral lymphadenectomy for all patients resulted in many patients undergoing a morbid procedure without any real benefit. Sentinel node dissection, by removing only the nodes with the highest risk of containing metastases, offers a much less morbid alternative. In addition, because only one or two lymph nodes are removed, these can be subjected to a more thorough histopathologic analysis than conventional complete lymphadenectomy. This involves serial sectioning and immunohistochemical staining for cytokeratin antigen. Very small metastases, termed micrometastases, can be detected in this fashion. Therefore, sentinel node dissection with serial sectioning and immuno-histochemical staining potentially offers a more accurate assessment of the regional nodes with less morbidity. Patients with positive sentinel nodes may then undergo additional therapy. Patients with negative sentinel nodes are theoretically at very low risk for metastases and should not require any additional treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Cancer Facts and Figures, 2005. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2005.

  2. Berek JS, Hacker NF: Practical Gynecologic Oncology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Taussig FJ:Cancer of the vulva: an analysis of 155 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1940, 40:764–770.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Way S: The anatomy of the lymphatic drainage of the vulva and its influence on the radical operation for carcinoma. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1948, 3:187–197.

    Google Scholar 

  5. DiSaia PJ, Creasman WT, Rich WM: An alternative approach to early cancer of the vulva. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1979, 133:825–830.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Stehman FB, Bundy BN, Dvoretsky PM, Creasman WT:Early stage I carcinoma of the vulva treated with ipsilateral superficial inguinal lymphadenectomy and modified radical hemivulvectomy: a prospective study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group. Obstet Gynecol 1992, 79:490–497.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Anderson BL, Hacker NF: Psychosexual adjustment after vulvar surgery. Obstet Gynecol 1983, 62:457–462.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wharton JT, Gallager S, Rutledge FN: Microinvasive carcinoma of the vulva. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1974, 118:159.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Parker RT, Duncan I, Rampone J, Creasman W: Operative management of early invasive epidermoid carcinoma of the vulva. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1975, 123:349.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Parry-Jones E: Lymphatic of the vulva. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1963, 70:751.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. DeCesare SL, Fiorica JV, Roberts WS, et al.: A pilot study utilizing intraopertive lymphoscintigraphy for identification of the sentinel lymph nodes in vulvar cancer. Gynecol Oncol 1997, 66:425–428.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. deHullu JA, Hollema H, Piers DA, et al.: Sentinel lymph node procedure is highly accurate in squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva. J Clin Oncol 2000, 18:2811–2816. This is a large prospective trial documenting excellent outcomes using sentinel node dissection.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Podratz KC, Symmonds RE, Taylor WF: Carcinoma of the vulva: analysis and treatment failures. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982, 143:340–351.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sliutz G, Reinthaller A, Lantzsch T, et al.: Lymphatic mapping of sentinel nodes in early vulvar cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2002, 84:449–452.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Coleman RL: Vulvar lymphatic mapping: coming of age? Ann Surg Oncol 2002, 9:823–825.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Levenback C, Burke TW, Gershenson DM, et al.:Intraoperative lymphatic mapping for vulvar cancer. Obstet Gynecol 1994, 84:163–167.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Levenback C, Burke TW, Morris M, et al.: Potential applications of intraoperative lymphatic mapping in vulvar cancer. Gynecol Oncol 1995, 59:216–220.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Morton DL, Wen DR, Wong JH, et al.: Technical details of intraoperative lymphatic mapping for early stage melanoma. Arch Surg 1992, 127:392–399.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Reintgen D, Cruse CW, Wells K, et al.: The orderly progression of melanoma metastases. Ann Surg 1994, 220:759–767.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nieweg OE, Baidjnath Panday RKL, Muller S, et al.: Lymphoscintigraphy, lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in melanoma patients using a single dose of 99mTccolloid [abstract]. Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam. Heidelberg, Germany: European Society of Surgical Oncology; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Terada KY, Coel MN, Ko P, Wong JH: Combined use of intraoperative lymphatic mapping and lymphoscintigraphy in the management of squamous cell cancer of the vulva. Gynecol Oncol 1998, 70:65–69.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. TeradaKY, Shimizu DM, Wong JM: Sentinel node dissection and ultrastaging in squamous cell cancer of the vulva. Gynecol Oncol 2000, 76:40–44. This report emphasizes the importance of pathologic evaluation of the sentinel node with serial sectioning and immuno-histochemical staining for cytokeratin antigen.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Moore RG, DePasquale SE, Steinoff MM, et al.: Sentinel node identification and the ability to detect metastatic tumor to inguinal lymph nodes in squamous cell cancer of the vulva. Gynecol Oncol 2003, 89:475–479.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tamussimo KF, Bader AA, Lax SF, et al.: Groin recurrence after micrometastasis in a sentinel lymph node in a patient with vulvar cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2002, 86:99–101. This case report emphasizes the importance of additional treatment for patients found to have micrometastases in the sentinel node.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Fons G, ter Rahe B, Sloof G, et al.: Failure in the detection of the sentinel lymph node with a combined technique of radioactive tracer and blue dye in a patient with cancer of the vulva and a single positive lymph node. Gynecol Oncol 2004, 92:981–984. This case report demonstrates the problem of grossly positive nodes that fail to take up either tracer.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Rink T, Heuser T, Fitz H, et al.: Results of a standardized protocol for sentinel node imaging in breast cancer with Tc-99 labeled nanocolloid albumin. Nuklearmedizin 2001, 40:80–85.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Borgstein PJ, Pijpers R, Comans EF, et al.: Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: guidelines and pitfalls of lymphoscintigraphy and gamma probe detection. J Am Coll Surg 1998, 186:275–283.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Louis-Sylvestre C, Evangelista E, Leonard F, et al.:Sentinel node localization should be interpreted with caution in midline vulvar cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2005, 97:151–154. These case reports demonstrate the potential pitfall of relying only on preoperative lymphoscintigraphy to identify the sentinel node with midline cancers. This underscores the importance of careful patient selection and pretreatment evaluation.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. De Hulla JA, Oonk MHM, Ansink AC, et al.: Pitfalls in the sentinel node procedure in vulvar cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2004, 94:10–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hakim, A.A., Terada, K.Y. Sentinel node dissection in vulvar cancer. Curr. Treat. Options in Oncol. 7, 85–91 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-006-0043-4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-006-0043-4

Keywords

Navigation