Opinion statement
Vulvar cancer is an uncommon but devastating disease. In addition to radical vulvectomy, most patients require inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy, which often results in wound infection, wound breakdown, and chronic lymphedema. In the past, the gold standard for early lesions was radical vulvectomy with complete bilateral inguinal-femoral lymphadenectomy. This resulted in a low rate of recurrence but devastating disfigurement and high complication rates. Because only approximately 20% of patients with vulvar cancer have positive lymph nodes upon presentation, the traditional approach of inguinal-femoral lymphadenectomy for all patients resulted in many patients undergoing a morbid procedure without any real benefit. Sentinel node dissection, by removing only the nodes with the highest risk of containing metastases, offers a much less morbid alternative. In addition, because only one or two lymph nodes are removed, these can be subjected to a more thorough histopathologic analysis than conventional complete lymphadenectomy. This involves serial sectioning and immunohistochemical staining for cytokeratin antigen. Very small metastases, termed micrometastases, can be detected in this fashion. Therefore, sentinel node dissection with serial sectioning and immuno-histochemical staining potentially offers a more accurate assessment of the regional nodes with less morbidity. Patients with positive sentinel nodes may then undergo additional therapy. Patients with negative sentinel nodes are theoretically at very low risk for metastases and should not require any additional treatment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References and Recommended Reading
Cancer Facts and Figures, 2005. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2005.
Berek JS, Hacker NF: Practical Gynecologic Oncology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005.
Taussig FJ:Cancer of the vulva: an analysis of 155 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1940, 40:764–770.
Way S: The anatomy of the lymphatic drainage of the vulva and its influence on the radical operation for carcinoma. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1948, 3:187–197.
DiSaia PJ, Creasman WT, Rich WM: An alternative approach to early cancer of the vulva. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1979, 133:825–830.
Stehman FB, Bundy BN, Dvoretsky PM, Creasman WT:Early stage I carcinoma of the vulva treated with ipsilateral superficial inguinal lymphadenectomy and modified radical hemivulvectomy: a prospective study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group. Obstet Gynecol 1992, 79:490–497.
Anderson BL, Hacker NF: Psychosexual adjustment after vulvar surgery. Obstet Gynecol 1983, 62:457–462.
Wharton JT, Gallager S, Rutledge FN: Microinvasive carcinoma of the vulva. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1974, 118:159.
Parker RT, Duncan I, Rampone J, Creasman W: Operative management of early invasive epidermoid carcinoma of the vulva. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1975, 123:349.
Parry-Jones E: Lymphatic of the vulva. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1963, 70:751.
DeCesare SL, Fiorica JV, Roberts WS, et al.: A pilot study utilizing intraopertive lymphoscintigraphy for identification of the sentinel lymph nodes in vulvar cancer. Gynecol Oncol 1997, 66:425–428.
deHullu JA, Hollema H, Piers DA, et al.: Sentinel lymph node procedure is highly accurate in squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva. J Clin Oncol 2000, 18:2811–2816. This is a large prospective trial documenting excellent outcomes using sentinel node dissection.
Podratz KC, Symmonds RE, Taylor WF: Carcinoma of the vulva: analysis and treatment failures. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982, 143:340–351.
Sliutz G, Reinthaller A, Lantzsch T, et al.: Lymphatic mapping of sentinel nodes in early vulvar cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2002, 84:449–452.
Coleman RL: Vulvar lymphatic mapping: coming of age? Ann Surg Oncol 2002, 9:823–825.
Levenback C, Burke TW, Gershenson DM, et al.:Intraoperative lymphatic mapping for vulvar cancer. Obstet Gynecol 1994, 84:163–167.
Levenback C, Burke TW, Morris M, et al.: Potential applications of intraoperative lymphatic mapping in vulvar cancer. Gynecol Oncol 1995, 59:216–220.
Morton DL, Wen DR, Wong JH, et al.: Technical details of intraoperative lymphatic mapping for early stage melanoma. Arch Surg 1992, 127:392–399.
Reintgen D, Cruse CW, Wells K, et al.: The orderly progression of melanoma metastases. Ann Surg 1994, 220:759–767.
Nieweg OE, Baidjnath Panday RKL, Muller S, et al.: Lymphoscintigraphy, lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in melanoma patients using a single dose of 99mTccolloid [abstract]. Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam. Heidelberg, Germany: European Society of Surgical Oncology; 1994.
Terada KY, Coel MN, Ko P, Wong JH: Combined use of intraoperative lymphatic mapping and lymphoscintigraphy in the management of squamous cell cancer of the vulva. Gynecol Oncol 1998, 70:65–69.
TeradaKY, Shimizu DM, Wong JM: Sentinel node dissection and ultrastaging in squamous cell cancer of the vulva. Gynecol Oncol 2000, 76:40–44. This report emphasizes the importance of pathologic evaluation of the sentinel node with serial sectioning and immuno-histochemical staining for cytokeratin antigen.
Moore RG, DePasquale SE, Steinoff MM, et al.: Sentinel node identification and the ability to detect metastatic tumor to inguinal lymph nodes in squamous cell cancer of the vulva. Gynecol Oncol 2003, 89:475–479.
Tamussimo KF, Bader AA, Lax SF, et al.: Groin recurrence after micrometastasis in a sentinel lymph node in a patient with vulvar cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2002, 86:99–101. This case report emphasizes the importance of additional treatment for patients found to have micrometastases in the sentinel node.
Fons G, ter Rahe B, Sloof G, et al.: Failure in the detection of the sentinel lymph node with a combined technique of radioactive tracer and blue dye in a patient with cancer of the vulva and a single positive lymph node. Gynecol Oncol 2004, 92:981–984. This case report demonstrates the problem of grossly positive nodes that fail to take up either tracer.
Rink T, Heuser T, Fitz H, et al.: Results of a standardized protocol for sentinel node imaging in breast cancer with Tc-99 labeled nanocolloid albumin. Nuklearmedizin 2001, 40:80–85.
Borgstein PJ, Pijpers R, Comans EF, et al.: Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: guidelines and pitfalls of lymphoscintigraphy and gamma probe detection. J Am Coll Surg 1998, 186:275–283.
Louis-Sylvestre C, Evangelista E, Leonard F, et al.:Sentinel node localization should be interpreted with caution in midline vulvar cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2005, 97:151–154. These case reports demonstrate the potential pitfall of relying only on preoperative lymphoscintigraphy to identify the sentinel node with midline cancers. This underscores the importance of careful patient selection and pretreatment evaluation.
De Hulla JA, Oonk MHM, Ansink AC, et al.: Pitfalls in the sentinel node procedure in vulvar cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2004, 94:10–15.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hakim, A.A., Terada, K.Y. Sentinel node dissection in vulvar cancer. Curr. Treat. Options in Oncol. 7, 85–91 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-006-0043-4
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-006-0043-4