Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Locally advanced esophageal cancer

  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Opinion statement

Patients diagnosed with adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus should undergo computed tomography of the chest and abdomen and positron emission tomography to look for evidence of distant metastatic disease. In the absence of systemic metastases, locoregional staging should be performed with endoscopic ultrasonography and fine needle aspiration of accessible periesophageal lymph nodes and any detectable celiac lymph nodes. Patients found to have T3 tumors (transmural extension), T4 tumors (invasion of adjacent structures), or N1-M1a (lymph nodepositive) disease do poorly when treated with surgery alone; 5-year survival is less than 20%. These patients should be considered for combined modality therapy. Patients with T4 disease are generally not deemed candidates for surgical resection; they may be considered for definitive chemoradiotherapy. Patients with T3 disease or lymph node-positive disease may be treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery or definitive chemoradiotherapy alone. Patients considered for trimodality therapy should be fully restaged before surgery to assess their response to neoadjuvant treatment. This should include repeat endoscopic ultrasound and fine needle aspiration of lymph nodes. Patients whose lymph node metastases do not completely respond to neoadjuvant therapy are unlikely to benefit from the addition of surgery. Patients with persistently positive celiac lymph nodes have a very poor prognosis and should not undergo surgery. Patients with persistent nodal disease who have good performance status may be considered for additional chemotherapy. Patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer who have poor performance status are not good candidates for combined modality therapy. These individuals are best managed with palliative intent. Particular attention should be given to alleviating the common problem of dysphagia, which causes significant morbidity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Jemal A, Thomas A, Murray T, et al.: Cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 2002, 52:23–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rosch T, Classen M: Staging esophageal cancer. In Gastrointestinal Endosonography. Edited by Van Dam J. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1999:139–146.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rice TW, Adelstein DJ: Precise clinical staging allows treatment modification of patients with esophageal carcinoma. Oncology 1997, 11:58–62.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rice TW, Blackstone EH, Adelstein DJ, et al.: N1 esophageal carcinoma: the importance of staging and downstaging. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001, 121:454–464.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Eloubeidi MA, Wallace MB, Hoffman BJ, et al.: Predictors of survival for esophageal cancer patients with and without celiac axis lymphadenopathy: impact of staging endosonography. Ann Thorac Surg 2001, 72:212–220.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kelson DP, Ginsberg R, Pajak TF, et al.: Chemotherapy followed by surgery compared with surgery alone for localized esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med 1998, 339:1979–1984. A large intergroup trial that demonstrated that preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery does not improve survival compared with surgery alone. The frequency of complete response was less than with chemoradiotherapy reports.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Clark P: Surgical resection with or without preoperative chemotherapy in oesophageal cancer: an updated analysis of a randomized controlled trial conducted by the UK Medical Research Council Upper GI Tract Cancer Group [abstract]. London: MRC Clinical Trials Unit. Proc ASCO 2001, 20:126.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Walsh TN, Noonan N, Hollywood D, et al.: A comparison of multimodal therapy and surgery for esophageal adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med 1996, 335:462–467. A prospective randomized trial that demonstrated an improvement in survival with the use of preoperative chemoradiotherapy. However, the control surgery arm performed remarkably poorer than expected in comparison with other trials.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bosset JF, Gignoux M, Triboulet JP, et al.: Chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery compared with surgery alone in squamous-cell cancer of the esophagus. N Engl J Med 1997, 337:161–167.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Urba SG, Orringer MB, Turrisi A, et al.: Randomized trial of preoperative chemoradiation versus surgery alone in patients with locoregional esophageal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2001, 19:305–313. Long-term results of an important but statistically underpowered prospective randomized trial of preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery versus surgery alone.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kelsen D: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2001, 19:283–285.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cooper JS, Guo MD, Herskovic A, et al.: Chemoradiotherapy of locally advanced esophageal cancer: long-term follow-up of a prospective randomized trial (RTOG 85-01). JAMA 1999, 281:1623–1627. An important prospective randomized trial that demonstrated the superiority of definitive chemoradiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone. The long-term local failure rate makes this regimen less than optimal. Local failure results from surgical trial are needed with this length of follow up for comparison.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Coia LR, Minsky BD, Berkey BA, et al.: Outcome of patients receiving radiation for cancer of the esophagus: results of the 1992-1994 patterns of care study. J Clin Oncol 2000, 18:455–462.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Denham JW, Burmeister BH, Lamb DS, et al.: Factors influencing outcome following radio-chemotherapy for esophageal cancer. Radiother Oncol 1996, 40:31–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Safran H, Gaissert H, Akerman P, et al.: Paclitaxel, cisplatin, and concurrent radiation for esophageal cancer. Cancer Invest 2001, 19:1–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Meluch AA, Hainsworth JD, Gray JR, et al.: Preoperative combined modality therapy with paclitaxel, carboplatin, prolonged infusion 5-fluorouracil, and radiation therapy in localized esophageal cancer: preliminary results of a Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network phase II trial. Cancer J Sci Am 1999, 5:84–91.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Heath EI, Burtness BA, Heitmiller RF, et al.: Phase II evaluation of preoperative chemoradiation and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for squamous cell and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. J Clin Oncol 2000, 18:868–876.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Adelstein DJ, Rice TW, Rybicki LA, et al.: Does paclitaxel improve the chemoradiotherapy of locoregionally advanced esophageal cancer? a nonrandomized comparison with fluorouracil-based therapy. J Clin Oncol 2000, 18:2032–2039.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ilson DH, Saltz L, Enzinger P, et al.: Phase II trial of weekly irinotecan plus cisplatin in advanced esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol 1999, 17:3270–3275.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ilson DH, Minsky B, Kelsen D: Irinotecan, cisplatin, and radiation in esophageal cancer. Oncology 2002, 16:11–15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Minsky BD, Pajak TF, Ginsberg RJ, et al.: Int 0123 (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 94-05). phase III trial of combined modality therapy for esophageal cancer: high-dose versus standard-dose radiation therapy. J Clin Oncol 2002, 20:1167–1174.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Turrisi AT, Hawes RH, Redmond C, et al.: Palliation with stent (S) or radiation therapy (RT) 20 Gy in 5 fractions intervention for esophageal (SORTIE) cancer dysphagia: a multicenter trial for T-4 N-any M +/- squamous or adenocarcinoma of the esophagus: a randomized trial relief from dysphagia and quality of life (QOL) analysis [abstract]. Proc ASCO 2002, 21:138.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Altorki NK, Girardi L, Skinner DB: En bloc esophagectomy improves survival for stage III esophageal cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997, 114:48–56.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fujita H, Kakegawa T, Yamana H, et al.: Mortality and morbidity rates, postoperative course, quality of life, and prognosis after extended radical lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Surg 1995, 222:654–662.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Tabira Y, Okuma T, Kondo K, et al.: Indications for three-field dissection followed by esophagectomy for advanced carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999, 117:239–245.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Raijman I, Siddique I, Ajani J, et al.: Palliation of malignant dysphagia and fistulae with coated expandable metal stents: experience with 101 patients. Gastrointest Endosc 1998, 48:172–179.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sherman, C.A., Turrisi, A.T., Wallace, M.B. et al. Locally advanced esophageal cancer. Curr. Treat. Options in Oncol. 3, 475–485 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-002-0067-3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-002-0067-3

Keywords

Navigation