Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Opinion statement

Melphalan combined with prednisone (MP) has been accepted as the standard therapy for previously untreated multiple myeloma (MM) because most studies demonstrate only a modest survival benefit of combination chemotherapy regimens when compared with MP. There have been modest gains with more intensive myeloablative regimens in combination with blood stem cell support, particularly for patients with early primary refractory disease who subsequently achieve partial remission, and for the approximately 25% to 35% of patients achieving complete remission. To preserve the ability to adequately collect stem cells, the use of alkylating agents, such as melphalan, should be limited in the previously untreated patient with myeloma (including those older than 65 years of age) who is a candidate for myeloablative therapy. Pulse dexamethasonecontaining regimens provide rapid responses and may be considered the first regimens of choice. Although vincristine/doxorubicin/dexamethasone (VAD) produces responses in approximately 50% to 70% of patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma, use early in the disease has not improved survival. Outside of a specific study protocol, this regimen may be best reserved for patients with refractory (particularly relapsing) disease. Notable exceptions include patients with renal failure or plasma cell leukemia in whom the rapid responses provided by VAD may avoid potentially permanent, serious complications. Recently, new agents with novel mechanisms of action (ie, thalidomide, immunomodulatory drugs, proteosome inhibitors) have demonstrated activity in resistant myeloma. Because these agents are likely to show activity alone or in combination, newly diagnosed patients and previously untreated patients should be considered for clinical trials. Thalidomide/dexamethasone has already produced response rates of 65% to 75% in previously untreated patients. Its ease of administration along with stem cell preservation are likely to make this, followed by myeloablative therapy with stem cell support, the treatment of choice for untreated myeloma as confirmatory studies are completed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Weber DM, Dimopoulos MA, Moulopoulos LA, et al.: Prognostic features of asymptomatic multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol 1997, 97:810–814.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hjorth M, Hellquist L, Holmberg E, et al.: Initial versus deferred melphalan-prednisone therapy for asymptomatic multiple myeloma stage I: a randomized study. Eur J Hematol 1993, 50:95–102.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Alexanian R, Dimopoulos MA: Management of multiple myeloma. Semin Hematol 1995, 32:20–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dudeny S, Hussein MA, Karam MA, et al.: Kyphoplasty (KPT) in the treatment of vertebral compression fractures due to multiple myeloma (MM). Blood 2000, 96:754. Abstract #3290.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Berenson JR, Lichtenstein A, Parker L, et al.: Efficacy of pamidronate in reducing skeletal events in patients with advanced myeloma. N Engl J Med 1996, 334:488–493.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Berenson JR: New advances in the biology and treatment of myeloma bone disease. Semin Hematol 2001, 38:15–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Combination chemotherapy versus melphalan plus prednisone as treatment for multiple myeloma: an overview of 6,633 patients from 27 randomized trials. Myeloma Trialists’ Collaborative Group. J Clin Oncol 1998, 16:3832-3842.

  8. Hjorth M, Hellquist L, Holmberg E, et al.: Initial treatment in multiple myeloma: no advantage of multidrug chemotherapy over melphalan-prednisone. Br J Haematol 1998, 74:185–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Boccadoro M, Palumbo A, Argentino C, et al.: Conventional induction treatments do not influence overall survival in multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol 1997, 96:333–337.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Boccadoro M, Marmont F, Tribalto M, et al.: Multiple myeloma: VMCP/VBAP alternating combination: chemotherapy is not superior to melphalan and prednisone even in high risk patients. J Clin Oncol 1991, 9:444–448.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Alexanian R, Dimopoulos MA, DeLasalle K, et al.: Primary dexamethasone treatment of multiple myeloma. Blood 1992, 80:887–890.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Alexanian R, Barlogie B, Tucker S: VAD-based regimens as primary treatment for multiple myeloma. Am J Hematol 1990, 33:86–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dimopoulos MA, Palumbo A, DeLasalle K, et al.: Primary plasma cell leukemia. Br J Haematol 1994, 88:754–759.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Boccadoro M, Pileri A: Standard chemotherapy for myelomatosis: an area of great controversy. Hematol Clin North Am 1992, 6:371–382.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Interferon-_2b added to melphalan-prednisone for initial maintenance therapy in multiple myeloma. The Nordic Myeloma Study Group.} Ann Intern Med 1996, 124:212-222.

  16. Interferon as therapy for multiple myeloma: an individual patient data overview of 24 randomized trials and 4012 patients. The Myeloma Trialists’ Collaborative Group. Br J Haematol 2001, 113:1020-1034.

  17. Alexanian R, Weber D: Whither interferon for multiple myeloma and other hematologic malignancies: Ann Intern Med 1996, 124:264–265.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Salmon SE, Crowley JJ, Batcerzak SP, et al.: Interferon versus interferon plus prednisone remission maintenance therapy for multiple myeloma: a Southwest Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol 1998, 16:890–896.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Alexanian R, Weber D, Dimopoulos M, et al.: Randomized trial of _-interferon or dexamethasone as maintenance treatment for multiple myeloma. Am J Hematol 2000, 65:204–209.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Attal M, Harousseau J, Stoppa J, et al.: Autologous bone marrow transplantation versus conventional chemotherapy in multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 1996, 335:91–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fermand JP, Ravaud P, Chevret S, et al.: High-dose therapy and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma: up-front or rescue treatment? Results of a multicenter sequential randomized clinical trial. Blood 1998, 92:3131–3136.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Alexanian R, Dimopoulos MA, Hester J, et al.: Early myeloablative therapy for multiple myeloma. Blood 1994, 84:4276–4282.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Alexanian R, Dimopoulos MA, DeLasalle KB, et al.: Myeloablative therapy for primary resistant multiple myeloma. Stem Cells 1995, 13:118–121.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Alexanian R, Weber D, Giralt S, et al.: Impact of complete remission with intensive therapy in patients with responsive multiple myeloma. Bone Marrow Transplant 2001, 27:1037–1043.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Alexanian R, Weber DM, Delasalle KB: Frequency and impact of complete remission in patients with multiple myeloma of low tumor mass who received intensive therapy supported by autologous stem cell transplantation (IT + ASCT). Blood 2001, 98:850a. Abstract #3530.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Siegel D, Desikan KR, Mehta J, et al.: Age is not a prognostic variable with autotransplants for multiple myeloma. Blood 1999, 93:51–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Attal M, Harrousseau JL, Facon T: Single versus double transplant in myeloma: a randomized trial of the "Inter Groupe Francais Du Myelome (IFM). VIII International Myeloma Workshop, Banff, Alberta, Canada; May 4–8, 2001.

  28. Barlogie B, Jagannath S, Desikan KR, et al.: Total therapy with tandem transplants for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Blood 1999, 93:55–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rajkumar SV, Hayman SR, Gertz MA, et al.: Combination therapy with thalidomide plus dexamethasone THAL/DEX) for newly diagnosed myeloma (mm). Blood 2001, 98:849a. Abstract #3525.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Weber DM, Rankin K, Delasalle K, et al.: Thalidomide alone and in combination for previously untreated myeloma. VIII International Myeloma Workshop, Banff, Alberta, Canada; May 4–8, 2001.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weber, D.M. Newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Curr. Treat. Options in Oncol. 3, 235–245 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-002-0013-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-002-0013-4

Keywords

Navigation