Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Myelodysplastic syndromes

  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Opinion statement

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a heterogenous group of disorders with a variable clinical course and prognosis. Treatment should be individualized based on the patient’s age, subtype, percent blasts in the marrow, and cytogenetics. The use of the International Prognostic Scoring Index is helpful in assigning prognosis. The standard of care for lowrisk patients is supportive care. Low-risk patients with symptomatic anemia should be considered for a trial of erythropoietin. The serum erythropoietin (EPO) level may help predict response to treatment. The treatment of the symptomatic and high-risk patient is unclear. Low-dose cytarabine, amifostine, and 5-azacitidine can induce responses in selected patients, but the duration of responses is short, and treatment does not appear to prolong survival. Intensive chemotherapy should be reserved for high-risk, younger patients. Topotecan and intermediate cytarabine appear to have an active regimen, but remissions are short. Younger patients who present with high-risk MDS without an antecedent history of MDS should receive intensive acute myeloid leukemia (AML) induc tion chemotherapy. Younger patients with high-risk MDS and an HLA-compatible donor should be offered an allogeneic stem cell transplant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Heaney ML, Golde DW: Myelodysplasia. New Engl J Med 1999, 340:1649–1660. Very good review.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bennett JM, Catovsky D, Daniel MT, et al.: Proposals for the classification of the myelodysplastic syndromes. Br J Haematol 1982;51:189–199.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Greenberg P, Cox C, LeBeau MM, et al.: International scoring system for evaluating prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood 1998, 91:1100–1110. Excellent description of the proposed scoring system.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Miller K: Erythropoietin, with and without granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients. Leuk Res 1998, 22:13–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hellstrom-Lindbeg E, Negrin R, Stein R, et al.: Erythroid response to treatment with G-CSF plus erythropoietin for the anaemia of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome: proposal for a predictive model. Br J Haematol 1997, 99:344–351. Meta-analysis of the use of EPO plus G-CSF: an international, popular study.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wattel E, Cambier N, Caulier MT, et al.: Androgen therapy in myelodysplastic syndromes with thrombocytopenia: a report on 20 case. Br J Haematol 1994, 87:205–208.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. List AF, Brasfield F, Heaton R, et al.: Stimulation of hematopoiesis by amifostine in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. Blood 1997, 90:3364–3369.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Molldrem JJ, Caples M, Mavroudis D, et al.: Antithymocyte globulin for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. Br J Haematol 1997, 99:699–705.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wihermans PW, Krulder JWM, Hujgens PC, Neve P: Continuous infusion of low dose 5-aza-2-deoxycytidine in elderly patients with high risk myelodysplastic syndrome. Leukemia 1997, 11:19–23.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Miller K, Kyungmann K, Morrison FS, et al.: The evaluation of low dose cytarabine in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes: a Phase III intergroup study. Ann Hematol 1980, 65:162–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Beran M, Kantarjan H: Results of topotecan based combination therapy in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Semin Hematol 1999, 36:3–10.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bernstein SH, Brunetto VL, Davey FR, et al.: Acute myeloid leukemia-type chemotherapy for newly diagnosed patients without antecedent cytopenias having myelodysplastic syndrome as defined by French-American-British criteria. A Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study. J Clin Oncol 1996, 14:2486–2494.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wattel E, De Botton S, Luc Lai J, et al.: Long-term follow-up of de novo myelodysplastic syndromes treated with intensive chemotherapy: incidence of long-term survivors and outcome of partial responders. Br J Haematol 1997, 98:983–991.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miller, K.B. Myelodysplastic syndromes. Curr. Treat. Options in Oncol. 1, 63–69 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-000-0016-y

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-000-0016-y

Keywords

Navigation