Skip to main content
Log in

An Improved Group Decision-Making Model for the Investment Options of Small-Scale Photovoltaic Systems Based on Cumulative Prospect Theory and Choquet Integral

  • Complex Science Management
  • Published:
Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences

Abstract

With the development of photovoltaic (PV) industry, installing small-scale PV systems which are integrated into the buildings becomes popular. Therefore, it is important to make optimal investment decisions for investors and consumers. This paper proposes an improved group decision-making method which integrates the cumulative prospect theory and Choquet integral for the investment options of small-scale PV systems. From the perspective of sustainability, the alternatives are evaluated by four criteria, including economic benefits, solar energy condition, carbon emissions and social benefits. Since the performances of criteria are given by decision makers as linguistic variables, the proposed method measures the criteria values by intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. Then the alternatives are evaluated and ranked to determine the optimal option. Finally, the proposed method is implemented in a case study to illustrate its feasibility and effectiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hoggett R. Technology scale and supply chains in a secure, affordable and low carbon energy transition [J]. Applied Energy, 2014, 123: 296–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jia F, Sun H, Koh L. Global solar photovoltaic industry: An overview and national competitiveness of Taiwan [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 126: 550–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Grossmann W D, Grossmann I, Steininger K W. Distributed solar electricity generation across large geographic areas, Part I: A method to optimize site selection, generation and storage [J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2013, 25: 831–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Eltawil M A, Zhao Z M. Grid-connected photovoltaic power systems: Technical and potential problems A review [J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2010, 14(1): 112–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Abdallah T, Diabat A, Rigter J. Investigating the option of installing small scale PVs on facility rooftops in a green supply chain [J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2013, 146(2): 465–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. El-Khattam W, Bhattacharya K, Hegazy Y, et al. Optimal investment planning for distributed generation in a competitive electricity market [J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2004, 19(3): 1674–1684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kucuksari S, Khaleghi A M, Hamidi M, et al. An Integrated GIS, optimization and simulation framework for optimal PV size and location in campus area environments [J]. Applied Energy, 2014, 113: 1601–1613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Koo C, Hong T, Lee M, et al. An integrated multi-objective optimization model for determining the optimal solution in implementing the rooftop photovoltaic system [J]. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 57: 822–837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Xiao J H, Yao Z Y, Qu J J, et al. Research on an optimal site selection model for desert photovoltaic power plants based on analytic hierarchy process and geographic information system [J]. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 2015, 5(2): 023132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Aragonesbeltran P, Chaparrogonzalez F, Pastorferrando J P, et al. An ANP-based approach for the selection of photovoltaic solar power plant investment projects [J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2010, 14(1): 249–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee A H I, Kang H Y, Lin C Y, et al. An integrated decision-making model for the location of a PV solar plant [J]. Sustainability, 2015, 7(10): 13522–13541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rezaei M, Mostafaeipour A, Qolipour M, et al. Investigation of the optimal location design of a hybrid wind-solar plant: A case study [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43(1): 100–114.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wilton E, Delarue E. D’haeseleer W, et al. Reconsidering the capacity credit of wind power: Application of cumulative prospect theory [J]. Renewable Energy, 2014, 68: 752–760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Michalska E, Dudzinska-Baryla R. Comparison of the valuations of alternatives based on cumulative prospect theory and almost stochastic dominance [J]. Operation Research and Decision, 2012, 3(5): 23–36.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fangqiu Xu.

Additional information

Foundation item: Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71771085)

Biography: LIU Jicheng, male, Professor, research direction: information management, energy Internet.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, J., Fu, X., Xu, F. et al. An Improved Group Decision-Making Model for the Investment Options of Small-Scale Photovoltaic Systems Based on Cumulative Prospect Theory and Choquet Integral. Wuhan Univ. J. Nat. Sci. 24, 515–518 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11859-019-1430-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11859-019-1430-6

Key words

CLC number

Navigation