Advertisement

Effects of Strain Rate, Temperature and Grain Size on the Mechanical Properties and Microstructure Evolutions of Polycrystalline Nickel Nanowires: A Molecular Dynamics Simulation

  • Zhigang Ruan
  • Wenping Wu
  • Nanlin Li
Engineering Science
  • 41 Downloads

Abstract

Through molecular dynamics (MD) simulation, the dependencies of temperature, grain size and strain rate on the mechanical properties were studied. The simulation results demonstrated that the strain rate from 0.05 to 2 ns–1 affected the Young’s modulus of nickel nanowires slightly, whereas the yield stress increased. The Young’s modulus decreased approximately linearly; however, the yield stress firstly increased and subsequently dropped as the temperature increased. The Young’s modulus and yield stress increased as the mean grain size increased from 2.66 to 6.72 nm. Moreover, certain efforts have been made in the microstructure evolution with mechanical properties association under uniaxial tension. Certain phenomena such as the formation of twin structures, which were found in nanowires with larger grain size at higher strain rate and lower temperature, as well as the movement of grain boundaries and dislocation, were detected and discussed in detail. The results demonstrated that the plastic deformation was mainly accommodated by the motion of grain boundaries for smaller grain size. However, for larger grain size, the formations of stacking faults and twins were the main mechanisms of plastic deformation in the polycrystalline nickel nanowire.

Key words

polycrystalline nickel nanowires mechanical properties temperature grain size molecular dynamics (MD) simulation 

CLC number

TB 12 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Gleiter H. Nanostructured materials: Basic concepts and microstructure [J]. Acta Materialia, 2000, 48(1): 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Lu L, Shen Y, Chen X, et al. Ultrahigh strength and high electrical conductivity in copper [J]. Science, 2004, 304 (5669): 422–426.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Derlet P M, Van Swygenhoven H. Length scale effects in the simulation of deformation properties of nanocrystalline metals [J]. Scripta Materialia, 2002, 47(11):719–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Postma H W C, Kozinsky I, Husain A, et al. Dynamic range of nanotube- and nanowire-based electromechanical systems [J]. Applied Physics Letters, 2005, 86(22): 223105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Tonisch K, Cimalla V, Will F, et al. Nanowire-based electromechanical biomimetic sensor [J]. Physica E, 2007, 37(1-2): 208–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Lieber C M. One-dimensional nanostructures: Chemistry, physics & applications [J]. Solid State Communications, 1998, 107(11): 607–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Branicio P S, Rino J. Large deformation and amorphization of Ni nanowires under uniaxial strain: A molecular dynamics study [J]. Physical Review B, 2000, 62(24): 16950–16955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Wen Y H, Zhu Z Z, Shao G F, et al. The uniaxial tensile deformation of Ni nanowire: Atomic-scale computer simulations [J]. Physica E, 2005, 27(1-2): 113–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Huang D, Zhang Q, Qiao P. Molecular dynamics evaluation of strain rate and size effects on mechanical properties of FCC nickel nanowires [J]. Computational Materials Science, 2011, 50(3): 903–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Setoodeh A R, Attariani H, Khosrownejad M. Nickel nanowires under uniaxial loads: A molecular dynamics simulation study [J]. Computational Materials Science, 2008, 44(2): 378–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Wang W, Yi C, Fan K. Molecular dynamics study on temperature and strain rate dependences of mechanical tensile properties of ultrathin nickel nanowires [J]. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2013, 23(11): 3353–3361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Wu H A. Molecular dynamics study of the mechanics of metal nanowires at finite temperature [J]. European Journal of Mechanics A/Solids, 2006, 25(2): 370–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Wu H A. Molecular dynamics study on mechanics of metal nanowire [J]. Mechanics Research Communications, 2006, 33(1): 9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Park H S, Zimmerman J A. Modeling inelasticity and failure in gold nanowires [J]. Physical Review B, 2005, 72(5): 1–9.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Gan Y, Chen J K. Molecular dynamics study of size, temperature and strain rate effects on mechanical properties of gold nanofilms [J]. Applied Physics A, 2009, 95(2): 357–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Yuan L, Shan D, Guo B. Molecular dynamics simulation of tensile deformation of nano-single crystal aluminum [J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2007, 184(1-3): 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Chen M Q, Quek S S, Sha Z D, et al. Effects of grain size, temperature and strain rate on the mechanical properties of polycrystalline graphene—A molecular dynamics study [J]. Carbon, 2015, 85(14): 135–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Kadau K, Germann T C, Lomdahl P S, et al. Molecular dynamics study of mechanical deformation in nanocrystalline aluminum [J]. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 2004, 35(9): 2719–2723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Dongare A M, Rajendran A M, Lamattina B, et al. Tension-compression asymmetry in nanocrystalline Cu: High strain rate vs. quasi-static deformation [J]. Computational Materials Science, 2010, 49(2): 260–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Zhou K, Liu B, Yao Y, et al. Effects of grain size and shape on mechanical properties of nanocrystalline copper investigated by molecular dynamics [J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2014, 615: 92–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Li X, Hu W, Xiao S, et al. Molecular dynamics simulation of polycrystalline molybdenum nanowires under uniaxial tensile strain: Size effects [J]. Physica E, 2008, 40(10): 3030–3036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Tucker G J, Tiwari S, Zimmerman J A, et al. Investigating the deformation of nanocrystalline copper with microscale kinematic metrics and molecular dynamics [J]. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 2012, 60(3): 471–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Rupert T J. Strain localization in a nanocrystalline metal: Atomic mechanisms and the effect of testing conditions [J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 2013, 114(3): 4041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Plimpton S J. Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics [J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1995, 117(1): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Mishin Y, Farkas D, Mehl M J, et al. Interatomic potentials for monoatomic metals from experimental data and ab initio calculations [J]. Physical Review B, 1999, 59(5): 3393–3402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    Huang D, Zhang Q, Qiao P. Molecular dynamics evaluation of strain rate and size effects on mechanical properties of FCC nickel nanowires [J]. Computational Materials Science, 2011, 50(3): 903–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Sansoz F, Dupont V. Nanoindentation and plasticity in nanocrystalline Ni nanowires: A case study in size effect mitigation [J]. Scripta Materialia, 2010, 63(11): 1136–1139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    Wu Z X, Zhang Y W, Jhon M H, et al. Anatomy of nanomaterial deformation: Grain boundary sliding, plasticity and cavitation in nanocrystalline Ni [J]. Acta Materialia, 2013, 61(15): 5807–5820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    Li J. Atomeye: An efficient atomistic configuration viewer [J]. Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering, 2003, 1: 173–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    Honeycutt J D, Andersen H C. Molecular dynamics study of melting and freezing of small Lennard-Jones clusters [J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1987, 91(19): 4950–4963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    Born M, Huang K, Lax M. Dynamical theory of crystal lattices[ J]. American Journal of Physics, 1954, 39(2): 113–127.Google Scholar
  32. [32]
    Schiøtz J, Vegge T, Di Tolla F, et al. Atomic-scale simulations of the mechanical deformation of nanocrystalline metals [J]. Physical Review B, 1999, 60(17): 11971–11983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Wuhan University and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Civil EngineeringWuhan UniversityWuhan, HubeiChina

Personalised recommendations