An Improved Underwater Confrontation Simulation Method of Naval Amphibious Operational Training System

  • Yu LiuEmail author
  • Dan Li
  • Chundi Zheng
Computer Science


This paper described an improved underwater confrontation simulation method of naval amphibious operational training system. The initial position of submarine forces on the enemy is generated automatically, and the attacking distance model of torpedoes is established based on the kinematics theory, which is more flexible and reasonable to judge the launch condition compared to traditional method. The two kinds of confrontation behavior models on the enemy submarine are created to depict its tactical action from the defensive to the offensive as well as the contrary, ensuring that operational style is simulated more comprehensively and properly. The existing motion trajectory estimation and collision detection algorithms on operational platforms are also improved to reduce the iteration error and further enhance the detection accuracy of target hit.

Key words

combat training system military modeling and simulation striking distance model motion trajectory estimation collision detection 

CLC number

TP 391.4 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Felix K, Chang O. China’s naval rise and the South China Sea: An operational assessment[J]. Orbis, 2012, 56(1):19–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Bakhyt M, Zhanar O, Madina A, et al. A model of virtual training application for simulation of technological processes[ J]. Procedia Computer Science, 2015, 56:177–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Neil V H, Bodgan G, Venketesh N, et al. An overview of self-adaptive technologies within virtual reality training[J]. Computer Science Review, 2016, 22(11):65–68.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Christian D, Walter S, Martin K. Simulation-based multi-objective system optimization of train traction systems [J]. Simulation Modeling Practice and Theory, 2017, 72: 104–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Ngan S C. Evidential reasoning approach for multiple-criteria decision making: A simulation-based formulation[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2015, 42(9):4381–4396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Tian Y L, Hu L, Jiao Y, et al. Evaluation of simulationbased training for aircraft carrier marshalling with learning cubic and Kirkpatrick’s models[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2015, 28(1):152–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Wang J, Lin Y I, Hou S Y. A data mining approach for training evaluation in simulation-based training[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2015, 80(2):171–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Hayri O, Philip W, Scott A, et al. A dynamic simulation/ optimization model for scheduling restoration of degraded military training lands[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2016, 171(4):144–157.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Richard A, James D, James K, et al. A real-time near shore wave and current prediction system[J]. Journal of Marine Systems, 2008, 69(1):37–58.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Tencer L, Reznakova M, Cheriet M. Summit-training: A hybrid semi-supervised technique and its application to classification tasks [J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2017, 50(1): 1–20.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Wuhan University and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Unit 91976 of the Chinese PLAGuangzhou, GuangdongChina

Personalised recommendations