Skip to main content
Log in

Strategy selection of production technical standards in a manufacturing supply chain network: the role of partnership density

  • Complex Science Management
  • Published:
Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences

Abstract

This paper presents the game of production technical standards between downstream and upstream suppliers on a manufacturing supply chain network when the two parties have different partnership densities, namely, the numbers of replaceable and mature manufacturing partners. We firstly constructed a manufacturing chain network and analyzed its three relationship structures among suppliers with the presence of different relationship densities, and found that all the three relationships brought about the game of production technical standards between partnership- rich and partnership-scanty suppliers. Then we built a two-party payoff matrix, and analyzed the two-party game and evolutionary stable strategy, based on replication dynamic equation and asymmetric evolutionary game theory. The evolutionary stable strategies of two parties under varying payoff parameters were validated through numerical simulation. Finally, we proposed some suggestions for both those manufacturers with more partners and fewer partners, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chang C W, Chiang D M, Pai F Y. Cooperative strategy in supply chain networks[J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2012, 41(7): 1114–1124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen I J, Paulraj A. Towards a theory of supply chain management: The constructs and measurements[J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2004, 22(2): 119–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jiao J, You X, Kumar A. An agent-based framework for collaborative negotiation in the global manufacturing supply chain network[J]. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 2006, 22(3): 239–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Johanson J, Mattsson L G. Interorganizational relations in industrial systems: A network approach compared with the transaction-cost approach[J]. International Studies of Management & Organization, 1987, 17(1): 34–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lin H, Darnall N. Strategic alliance formation and structural configuration[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2015, 127(3): 549–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kothandaraman P, Wilson D T. The future of competition: value-creating networks[J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2001, 30(4): 379–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Inman R R, Blumenfeld D E. Product complexity and supply chain design[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2014, 52(7):1956–1969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Arshinder Kanda A, Deshmukh S G. Supply chain coordination: Perspectives, empirical studies and research directions [J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2008, 115(2): 316–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Petersen K J, Handfield R B, Ragatz G L. Supplier integration into new product development: Coordinating product, process and supply chain design[J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2005, 23(3-4): 371–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mcivor R, Humphreys P. Early supplier involvement in the design process: Lessons from the electronics industry[J]. Omega, 2004, 32(3): 179–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Qian Y, Chen J, Miao L, et al. Information sharing in a competitive supply chain with capacity constraint[J]. Flexible Services & Manufacturing Journal, 2012, 24(4): 549–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hendricks K B, Singhal V R. The effect of supply chain glitches on shareholder wealth [J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2003, 21(5): 501–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Adner R, Kapoor R. Value creation in innovation ecosystems: how the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2010, 31(3):306–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ganesh M, Raghunathan S, Rajendran C. The value of information sharing in a multi-product, multi-level supply chain: Impact of product substitution, demand correlation, and partial information sharing [J]. Decision Support Systems, 2014, 58: 79–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sun D, He W, Zheng L, et al. Scheduling flexible job shop problem subject to machine breakdown with game theory[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2014, 52(13):3858–3876.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cachon G P, Zipkin P H. Competitive and cooperative inventory policies in a two-stage supply chain [J]. Management Science, 1999, 45(7): 936–953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Arshinder Kanda A, Deshmukh S G. Supply chain coordination: Perspectives, empirical studies and research directions [J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2008, 115(2): 316–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nair A, Jayaram J, Das A. Strategic purchasing participation, supplier selection, supplier evaluation and purchasing performance [J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2015, 53(20): 6263–6278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zsidisin G A, Smith M E. Managing supply risk with early supplier involvement: A case study and research propositions [J]. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 2005, 41(4): 44–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Vonderembse M A, Tracey M. The impact of supplier selection criteria and supplier involvement on manufacturing performance [J]. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 1999, 35(2): 33–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cachon G P, Lariviere M A. Capacity choice and allocation: Strategic behavior and supply chain performance[J]. Management Science, 1999, 45(8): 1091–1108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Powell W W. Interorganizationalcollaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1996, 41(1): 116–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mailath G J. Do people play Nash equilibrium? Lessons from evolutionary game theory [J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 1998, 36(3): 1347–1374.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Roca C P, Cuesta J A, Sánchez A. Evolutionary game theory: Temporal and spatial effects beyond replicator dynamics [J]. Physics of Life Reviews, 2009, 6(4): 208–249.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhendong Li.

Additional information

Foundation item: Supported by the Science and Technology Development Strategy Research Project of Tianjin (13ZLZLZF08900)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, H., Li, Z. Strategy selection of production technical standards in a manufacturing supply chain network: the role of partnership density. Wuhan Univ. J. Nat. Sci. 22, 517–522 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11859-017-1282-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11859-017-1282-x

Key words

CLC number

Navigation