Skip to main content
Log in

Survivability of components assembly in architecture

  • Published:
Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences

Abstract

Based on the in-depth analysis of the interaction patterns between the components of software system in architecture, this paper illustrates that the association among them is complex and usually changeable during the running period. So we assume the interactions between two adjacency components are grouped into a single connector, which can be used to analyze the influence of components assembly on the survivability for software architecture. The survivability of the components assembly is mapped into the connectivity of graph model. We also bring forward a simplicity method to calculate and quantify the survivability of architecture that could provide a more usable model for designers to evaluate the architecture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yacoub S M, Ammar H H. A Methodology for Architecture-Level Reliability Risk Analysis[J]. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 2002, 28(6): 529–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jacobson I, Griss M, Jonsson P. Software Reuse: Architecture, Process and Organization for Business Success[M]. New York: Addison Wesley Longman Limited, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Leach R. Software Reuse: Methods, Models, and Costs (Software Development) [M]. New York: McGraw-Hill Publisher, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  4. de Lemos R, Gacek C, Romanovsky A. Architectural Mismatches Tolerance[C]//Proceeding of the Architecting Dependable Systems (LNCS 2677). Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2003: 175–193.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Lyu M R. Handbook of Software Reliability Engineering [M]. New York: McGraw-Hill Publisher, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Medvidovic N, Taylor R N. A Classification and Comparison Framework for Software Architecture Description Languages [J]. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 2000, 26(1): 70–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sun Microsystems Inc. Enterprise JavaBeans Specification Version 2.1 [EB/OL]. [2008-04-06]. http://java.sun.com/products/ejb/index.jsp.

  8. Object Management Group. CORBA Components Final Submission[EB/OL]. [2008-07-06].http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/apps/doc?orbos/99-02-05.pdf.

  9. Mozilla Organization. XPCOM Project[EB/OL]. [2008-04-06]. http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/XPCOM.

  10. Souza D D, Wills A C. Objects, Components, and Frameworks with UML: The Catalysis Approach[M]. New York: Addison Wesley Publisher, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Katerina G P, Trivedi K S. Architecture-Based Approach to Reliability Assessment of Software Systems[C]//Proceedings of the 2005 International Workshop on Software and Performance. New York: Elsevier Science Press, 2005: 217.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wang W L, Wu Y, Chen M H. An Architecture-Based Software Reliability Model[C]//Proceedings of the 1999 Pacific Rim International Symposium on Dependable Computing. Washington, D C: IEEE Press, 1999: 143.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Guo.

Additional information

Foundation item: Supported by the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (2007AA012420)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guo, W., Zheng, Y. & Xu, R. Survivability of components assembly in architecture. Wuhan Univ. J. Nat. Sci. 13, 533–538 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11859-008-0505-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11859-008-0505-6

Key words

CLC number

Navigation