Abstract
This study forms part of a classroom teaching experiment on the development of a group of 25 9–10 years old students’ algebraic thinking. More specifically, it explored their reasoning while solving word problems built around functional relationships to determine how they generalized through questions posed using natural language, drawn figures or the keyword ‘many’. Their written and oral answers to those questions were analyzed qualitatively to determine which approach most effectively supported the expression of their generalization. The results reveal the benefits of posing questions about the general case in different ways while teaching students to use conventional algebraic representations. According to these findings, representing indeterminate quantities with the keyword ‘many’ induces generalization more successfully than representing them with letters. The use of letters prompts students to seek meaning for the letters, either conventionally, as an unknown or variable quantity, or otherwise, as a label or specific values assigned according to their own criteria. Identifying the most effective procedures may help teachers and curriculum designers formulate mathematical tasks that encourage students to express the generality they perceive in particular cases. Determining the communication demands of each approach is likewise highly useful.










Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Variables and indeterminate quantities are used without being distinguished, as synonyms in this paper.
References
Amit, M., & Neria, D. (2008). ‘Rising to the challenge’: Using generalization in pattern problems to unearth the algebraic skills of talented pre-algebra students. ZDM—the International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40(1), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-007-0069-5
Ayala-Altamirano, C., & Molina, M. (2020). Meanings attributed to letters in functional contexts by primary school students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18, 1271–1291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-10012-5
Ayala-Altamirano, C., & Molina, M. (2021). Fourth-graders’ justifications in early algebra tasks involving a functional relationship. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 107(2), 359–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10036-1
Bakker, A. (2019). Design research in education. Routledge.
Blanton, M. L., Brizuela, B. M., Gardiner, A. M., Sawrey, K., & Newman-Owens, A. (2017). A progression in first-grade children’s thinking about variable and variable notation in functional relationships. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 95(2), 181–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9745-0
Blanton, M. L., Isler-Baykal, I., Stroud, R., Stephens, A., Knuth, E., & Gardiner, A. M. (2019). Growth in children’s understanding of generalizing and representing mathematical structure and relationships. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 102(2), 193–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09894-7
Blanton, M. L., & Kaput, J. J. (2011). Functional thinking as a route into algebra in the elementary grades. In J. Cai & E. Knuth (Eds.), Early algebraization. Advances in mathematics education (pp. 5–23). Springer.
Carpenter, T. P., & Fennema, E. (1992). Cognitively guided instruction: Building on the knowledge of students and teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 17(5), 457–470.
Carraher, D. W., & Schliemann, A. D. (2010). Algebraic reasoning in elementary school classrooms. In D. Lambdin & F. K. Lester (Eds.), Teaching and learning mathematics: Translating research to the classroom (pp. 23–29). NCTM.
Carraher, D. W., & Schliemann, A. D. (2015). Powerful ideas in elementary school mathematics. In L. D. English & D. Kirshner (Eds.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 191–208). Routledge.
Caspi, S., & Sfard, A. (2012). Spontaneous meta-arithmetic as a first step toward school algebra. International Journal of Educational Research, 51–52, 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2011.12.006
Cobb, P., & Gravemeijer, K. (2008). Experimenting to support and understand learning processes. In A. E. Kelly, R. A. Lesh, & J. Y. Baek (Eds.), Handbook of design research methods in education: Innovations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics learning and teaching (pp. 68–95). LEA.
Cooper, T. J., & Warren, E. (2008). The effect of different representations on Years 3 to 5 students’ ability to generalize. ZDM—the International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-007-0066-8
Dörfler, W. (2008). En route from patterns to algebra: Comments and reflections. ZDM—the International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40(1), 143–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-007-0071-y
Ellis, A. B. (2007). Connections between generalizing and justifying: Students’ reasoning with linear relationships. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(3), 194–229. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034866
English, L. D., & Warren, E. A. (1998). Introducing the variable through pattern exploration. The Mathematics Teacher, 91(2), 166–170.
Kaput, J. J. (2008). What is algebra? What is algebraic reasoning? In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher, & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 5–17). LEA. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315097435-11
Kelly, A. E., & Lesh, R. A. (2000). Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education. LEA.
Kieran, C. (2004). Algebraic thinking in the early grades: What is it? The Mathematics Educator, 8(1), 139–151.
Kieran, C., Pang, J., Schifter, D., & Fong Ng, S. (2016). Early algebra: Research into its nature, its learning, its teaching. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32258-2
Lannin, J. K. (2005). Generalization and justification: The challenge of introducing algebraic reasoning through patterning activities. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 7(3), 231–258. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0703_3
Mason, J. (1996). Expressing generality and roots of algebra. In N. Bernarz, C. Kieran, & L. Lee (Eds.), Approaches to algebra (pp. 65–86). Springer.
Mason, J. (2017). Overcoming the algebra barrier: Being particular about the general, and generally looking beyond the particular, in homage to Mary Boole. In S. Stewart (Ed.), And the rest is just algebra (pp. 97–117). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45053-7_6
Mason, J., Graham, A., & Johnston-Wilder, S. (2005). Developing thinking in algebra. Open University and Sage Publications.
Mason, J., Graham, A., Pimm, D., & Gowar, N. (1985). Routes to algebra, roots of algebra. Open University.
Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte. (2014). Real Decreto 126/2014 de 28 de febrero, por el que se establece el currículo básico de la Educación Primaria [Royal Decree 126/2014 of February 28, which establishes the basic curriculum of primary education]. BOE, 52, 19349–19420
Molina, M. (2014). Traducción del simbolismo algebraico al lenguaje verbal: Indagando en la comprensión de estudiantes de diferentes niveles educativos [Translation of algebraic symbolism into verbal language: Inquiring into different educative levels of students’ understanding]. La Gaceta De La RSME, 17(3), 559–579.
Morgan, C., Craig, T., Schuette, M., & Wagner, D. (2014). Language and communication in mathematics education: An overview of research in the field. ZDM—the International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46(6), 843–853.
Pinto, E., & Cañadas, M. C. (2021). Generalizations of third and fifth graders within a functional approach to early algebra. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 33(1), 113–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-019-00300-2
Radford, L. (2003). Gestures, speech, and the sprouting of signs: A semiotic-cultural approach to students’ types of generalization. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 5(1), 37–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327833MTL0501_02
Radford, L. (2018). The emergence of symbolic algebraic thinking in primary school. In C. Kieran (Ed.), Teaching and learning algebraic thinking with 5- to 12-year-olds (pp. 3–25). Springer.
Ramírez, R., Brizuela, B. M., & Ayala-Altamirano, C. (2020). Word problems associated with the use of functional strategies among grade 4 students. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 33(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00346-7
Stephens, A., Ellis, A., Blanton, M. L., & Brizuela, B. M. (2017). Algebraic thinking in the elementary and middle grades. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education. Third handbook of research in mathematics education (pp. 386–420). NCTM.
Strachota, S., Knuth, E., & Blanton, M. L. (2018). Cycles of generalizing activities in the classroom. In C. Kieran (Ed.), Teaching and learning algebraic thinking with 5- to 12-year-olds (pp. 351–378). Springer.
Usiskin, Z. (1988). Conceptions of school algebra and uses of variables. In A. Coxford (Ed.), The ideas of algebra K–12 (pp. 8–19). NCTM.
Ursini, S. (2001). General methods: A way of entering the world of algebra. In R. Sutherland, T. Rojano, A. Bell, & R. Lins (Eds.), Perspectives on school algebra (Vol. 22, pp. 209–229). Kluwer.
Wertsch, J. V. (1995). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind (J. Zanón & M. Cortés, Trans.; 2nd ed.). Barcelona, Spain: Ediciones Paidós. (Original work published 1985).
Zazkis, R. (2001). From arithmetic to algebra via big numbers. In H. Chick, K. Stacey, J. Vincent, & J. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th ICMI study conference: The future of the teaching and learning of algebra (Vol. 2, pp. 676−681). University of Melbourne.
Acknowledgements
This work has been developed within the projects EDU2016-75771-P and PID2020-113601GB-I00, financed by the Spanish State Research Agency.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ayala-Altamirano, C., Molina, M. & Ambrose, R. Fourth graders’ expression of the general case. ZDM Mathematics Education 54, 1377–1392 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01398-8
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01398-8


