Skip to main content
Log in

Analyzing collective mathematical creativity among post high-school students working in small groups

  • Original Article
  • Published:
ZDM – Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In mathematics classrooms, educators encourage both creativity and collaboration. In the current study we investigated the dialogical moves that made up the interactions of three groups of post high-school students who worked on an open-ended mathematics task. The aim of this study was to characterize collective strategic pathways that can lead to different creativity products, and the possible impact of leadership styles and dialogical moves on those pathways. Collective strategic flexibility was defined as the number of strategies used by the group. Three strategy paths were found, namely, a disjointed strategy path, an emerging strategy path, and a straightforward strategy path. Dialogical moves such as asking for help, receiving clarifications, and explicating strategies, led to fluency. Elaborating mathematical explanations led to originality. Strategic flexibility was supported by evaluating strategies. Group leadership styles also contributed to varying amounts of cooperation and collaboration, in turn furthering different aspects of creativity. Findings indicated that cooperative collectives can lead to original unpredictable solutions. When a group is more collaborative, collective strategic flexibility may increase. When there is a mix, and students collaborate in a way that ensures that all can contribute, then collective fluency is promoted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
€32.70 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Finland)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdu, R., & Schwarz, B. (2020). Split up, but stay together: collaboration and cooperation in mathematical problem solving. Instructional Science, 48(3), 313–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adiredja, A. P., & Zandieh, M. (2020). Everyday examples in linear algebra: individual and collective creativity. Journal of Humanistic Mathematics, 10(2), 40–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aljarrah, A. (2020). Describing collective creative acts in a mathematical problem-solving environment. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 60, 100819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asterhan, C. S., & Schwarz, B. B. (2009). Argumentation and explanation in conceptual change: Indications from protocol analyses of peer-to-peer dialog. Cognitive Science, 33(3), 374–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2009). Do we all have multicreative potential?. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 41(1–2), 39–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles, R. E., & Runco, M. A. (2001). Developmental trends in the evaluative and divergent thinking of children. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3–4), 417–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esmonde, I. (2009). Mathematics learning in groups: analyzing equity in two cooperative activity structures. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(2), 247–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, C., & Mumford, M. D. (2013). Evaluation, criticism, and creativity: criticism content and effects on creative problem solving. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(4), 314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goos, M., & Galbraith, P. (1996). Do it this way! Metacognitive strategies in collaborative mathematical problem solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 30(3), 229–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargadon, A. B., & Bechky, B. A. (2006). When collections of creatives become creative collectives: a field study of problem solving at work. Organization Science, 17(4), 484–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haylock, D. (1997). Recognizing mathematical creativity in schoolchildren. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 27(2), 68–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, D. J., Lee, A., Tian, A. W., Newman, A., & Legood, A. (2018). Leadership, creativity, and innovation: a critical review and practical recommendations. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(5), 549–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglis, M., & Alcock, L. (2012). Expert and novice approaches to reading mathematical proofs. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(4), 358–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M. K., Roh, I. S., & Cho, M. K. (2016). Creativity of gifted students in an integrated math-science instruction. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 19, 38–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leikin, R. (2009). Exploring mathematical creativity using multiple solution tasks. In R. Leikin, A. Berman, & B. Koichu (Eds.), Creativity in mathematics and the education of gifted students (pp. 129–135). Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Leikin, R., & Lev, M. (2013). Mathematical creativity in generally gifted and mathematically excelling adolescents: What makes the difference?. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 45(2), 183–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levenson, E. (2011). Exploring mathematics creativity in elementary school. Journal of Creative Behavior, 45(3), 215–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liljedahl, P., & Sriraman, B. (2006). Musings on mathematical creativity. For the Learning of Mathematics, 26(1), 17–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lithner, J. (2008). A research framework for creative and imitative reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(3), 255–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, L., Towers, J., & Pirie, S. (2006). Collective mathematical understanding as improvisation. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 8(2), 149–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molad, O., Levenson, E., & Levy, S. (2020). Individual and group mathematical creativity among post-high school students. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 104, 201–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2016). Framework for 21st century learning. http://www.p21.org/about-us/p21-framework. Accessed 1 Aug 2021

  • Runco, M. (1996). Personal creativity: definition and developmental issues. New Directions for Child Development, 72, 3–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, R. K. (2004). Creative teaching: collaborative discussion as disciplined improvisation. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 12–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, R. K., & DeZutter, S. (2009). Distributed creativity: how collective creations emerge from collaboration. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(2), 81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sengil-Akar, S., & Yetkin-Ozdemir, I. E. (2020). Investigation of mathematical collective creativity of gifted middle school students during model-eliciting activities: the case of the quilt problem. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1768311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silver, E. (1997). Fostering creativity through instruction rich in mathematical problem solving and problem posing. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 3, 75–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tall, D., & Vinner, S. (1981). Concept image and concept definition in mathematics with particular reference to limits and continuity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12(2), 151–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsamir, P., Tirosh, D., & Levenson, E. (2008). Intuitive nonexamples: the case of triangles. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69(2), 81–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Esther S. Levenson.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Levenson, E.S., Molad, O. Analyzing collective mathematical creativity among post high-school students working in small groups. ZDM Mathematics Education 54, 193–209 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01321-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01321-7

Keywords

Navigation