Abstract
In mathematics classrooms, educators encourage both creativity and collaboration. In the current study we investigated the dialogical moves that made up the interactions of three groups of post high-school students who worked on an open-ended mathematics task. The aim of this study was to characterize collective strategic pathways that can lead to different creativity products, and the possible impact of leadership styles and dialogical moves on those pathways. Collective strategic flexibility was defined as the number of strategies used by the group. Three strategy paths were found, namely, a disjointed strategy path, an emerging strategy path, and a straightforward strategy path. Dialogical moves such as asking for help, receiving clarifications, and explicating strategies, led to fluency. Elaborating mathematical explanations led to originality. Strategic flexibility was supported by evaluating strategies. Group leadership styles also contributed to varying amounts of cooperation and collaboration, in turn furthering different aspects of creativity. Findings indicated that cooperative collectives can lead to original unpredictable solutions. When a group is more collaborative, collective strategic flexibility may increase. When there is a mix, and students collaborate in a way that ensures that all can contribute, then collective fluency is promoted.








Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdu, R., & Schwarz, B. (2020). Split up, but stay together: collaboration and cooperation in mathematical problem solving. Instructional Science, 48(3), 313–336.
Adiredja, A. P., & Zandieh, M. (2020). Everyday examples in linear algebra: individual and collective creativity. Journal of Humanistic Mathematics, 10(2), 40–75.
Aljarrah, A. (2020). Describing collective creative acts in a mathematical problem-solving environment. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 60, 100819.
Asterhan, C. S., & Schwarz, B. B. (2009). Argumentation and explanation in conceptual change: Indications from protocol analyses of peer-to-peer dialog. Cognitive Science, 33(3), 374–400.
Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2009). Do we all have multicreative potential?. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 41(1–2), 39–44.
Charles, R. E., & Runco, M. A. (2001). Developmental trends in the evaluative and divergent thinking of children. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3–4), 417–437.
Esmonde, I. (2009). Mathematics learning in groups: analyzing equity in two cooperative activity structures. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(2), 247–284.
Gibson, C., & Mumford, M. D. (2013). Evaluation, criticism, and creativity: criticism content and effects on creative problem solving. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(4), 314.
Goos, M., & Galbraith, P. (1996). Do it this way! Metacognitive strategies in collaborative mathematical problem solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 30(3), 229–260.
Hargadon, A. B., & Bechky, B. A. (2006). When collections of creatives become creative collectives: a field study of problem solving at work. Organization Science, 17(4), 484–500.
Haylock, D. (1997). Recognizing mathematical creativity in schoolchildren. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 27(2), 68–74.
Hughes, D. J., Lee, A., Tian, A. W., Newman, A., & Legood, A. (2018). Leadership, creativity, and innovation: a critical review and practical recommendations. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(5), 549–569.
Inglis, M., & Alcock, L. (2012). Expert and novice approaches to reading mathematical proofs. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(4), 358–390.
Kim, M. K., Roh, I. S., & Cho, M. K. (2016). Creativity of gifted students in an integrated math-science instruction. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 19, 38–48.
Leikin, R. (2009). Exploring mathematical creativity using multiple solution tasks. In R. Leikin, A. Berman, & B. Koichu (Eds.), Creativity in mathematics and the education of gifted students (pp. 129–135). Sense Publishers.
Leikin, R., & Lev, M. (2013). Mathematical creativity in generally gifted and mathematically excelling adolescents: What makes the difference?. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 45(2), 183–197.
Levenson, E. (2011). Exploring mathematics creativity in elementary school. Journal of Creative Behavior, 45(3), 215–234.
Liljedahl, P., & Sriraman, B. (2006). Musings on mathematical creativity. For the Learning of Mathematics, 26(1), 17–19.
Lithner, J. (2008). A research framework for creative and imitative reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(3), 255–276.
Martin, L., Towers, J., & Pirie, S. (2006). Collective mathematical understanding as improvisation. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 8(2), 149–183.
Molad, O., Levenson, E., & Levy, S. (2020). Individual and group mathematical creativity among post-high school students. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 104, 201–220.
Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2016). Framework for 21st century learning. http://www.p21.org/about-us/p21-framework. Accessed 1 Aug 2021
Runco, M. (1996). Personal creativity: definition and developmental issues. New Directions for Child Development, 72, 3–30.
Sawyer, R. K. (2004). Creative teaching: collaborative discussion as disciplined improvisation. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 12–20.
Sawyer, R. K., & DeZutter, S. (2009). Distributed creativity: how collective creations emerge from collaboration. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(2), 81.
Sengil-Akar, S., & Yetkin-Ozdemir, I. E. (2020). Investigation of mathematical collective creativity of gifted middle school students during model-eliciting activities: the case of the quilt problem. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1768311
Silver, E. (1997). Fostering creativity through instruction rich in mathematical problem solving and problem posing. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 3, 75–80.
Tall, D., & Vinner, S. (1981). Concept image and concept definition in mathematics with particular reference to limits and continuity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12(2), 151–169.
Tsamir, P., Tirosh, D., & Levenson, E. (2008). Intuitive nonexamples: the case of triangles. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69(2), 81–95.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Levenson, E.S., Molad, O. Analyzing collective mathematical creativity among post high-school students working in small groups. ZDM Mathematics Education 54, 193–209 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01321-7
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01321-7

