Advertisement

ZDM

pp 1–12 | Cite as

Identities available in intertwined discourses: mathematics student interaction

  • Annica Andersson
  • David WagnerEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Drawing on students’ language repertoires for conjecture, we here focus on communication acts to consider students’ mathematical identities in action. Our attention to authority and positioning in mathematics classrooms led us to interrogate the intertwined nature of discourses and how they may make identities available. We use an interaction among a group of grade ten students in a problem-solving situation to illustrate and develop our conceptualization of identities in contexts of intertwining discourses. We consider how the participants position themselves in relation to each other, to mathematics, and to other available discourses, and we ask how their communication acts might serve their purposes within the discourses. We discuss the implications of intertwined discourses for students’ developing identities when communicating in a mathematical context. We argue that one cannot understand students’ mathematical identities without understanding that their communication acts are also part of their repertoires for a range of discourses. This motivates intentional work to support the development of identities accessing available discourses in mathematics learning.

Keywords

Available discourses and identities Conflicting discourses Group work Identities Language repertoire Mathematics education Positioning theory 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (Grant no. 125644), as part of a Grant entitled “Students’ language repertoires for investigating mathematics” (Principal Investigator: David Wagner). The article is an elaboration of a research report presented at PME-NA (Andersson and Wagner, 2016).

References

  1. Andersson, A. (2011). A “curling teacher” in mathematics education: Teacher identities and pedagogy development. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 23(4), 437–454.Google Scholar
  2. Andersson, A., Meaney, T., & Valero, P. (2015). “I Am [not Always] a Math-hater”: Students’ (dis)engagement in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 90(2), 143–161.Google Scholar
  3. Andersson, A., & Wagner, D. (2016). Language repertoires for mathematical and other discourses. In M. B. Wood, E. E. Turner, M. Civil, & J. A. Eli, (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Pyschology of Mathematics Education (pp. 1166–1172). Tucson, AZ: The University of Arizona.Google Scholar
  4. Darragh, L. (2016). Identity research in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 93(1), 19–33.Google Scholar
  5. Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1999). Positioning and personhood. In R. Harré & L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional action (pp. 32–51). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  6. Esmonde, I., & Langer-Osuna, J. M. (2013). Power in numbers: Student participation in mathematical discussions in heterogeneous spaces. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 288–315.Google Scholar
  7. Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777–795.Google Scholar
  8. Hegedus, S., & Penuel, W. (2008). Studying new forms of participation and identity in mathematics classrooms with integrated communication and representational infrastructures. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 68, 171–183.Google Scholar
  9. Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A., Wagner, D., Johnson, K. R., Suh, H., & Figueras, H. (2015). Positioning in mathematics education: Revelations on an imported theory. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 89(2), 185–204.Google Scholar
  10. Holland, D. C., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Figured worlds. Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Kurth, L. A., Anderson, C. W., & Palincsar, A. S. (2002). The case of Carla: Dilemmas of helping all students to understand science. Science Education, 86(3), 287–313.Google Scholar
  12. Martin, J., & White, P. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  13. Nasir, N. (2014). Racialized identities: Race and achievement among African American youth. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Radovic, D., Black, L., Salas, C. E., & Williams, J. (2017). Being a girl mathematician: Diversity of positive mathematical identities in a secondary classroom. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 48(4), 434–464.Google Scholar
  15. Radovic, D., Black, L., Williams, J., & Salas, C. E. (2018). Towards conceptual coherence in the research on mathematics learner identity: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 99(1), 21–42.Google Scholar
  16. Rotman, B. (1988). Toward a semiotics of mathematics. Semiotica, 72(1/2), 1–35.Google Scholar
  17. Ryan, U. (2019). Mathematical preciseness and epistemological sanctions—Mono- and multilingual grade 5 students reasoning about angles. For the Learning of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  18. Skog, K., & Andersson, A. (2015). Exploring positioning as an analytical tool for understanding becoming mathematics teachers’ identities. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 27(1), 65–82.Google Scholar
  19. Solomon, Y. (2008). Mathematical literacy: Developing identities of inclusion. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. van Langenhove, L., & Harré, R. (1999). Introducing positioning theory. In R. Harré & L. van Lagenhove (Eds.), Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional action (pp. 14–31). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  21. Wagner, D., Andersson, A., & Herbel-Eisenmann, B. (2019). Available positions, identities and discourses in mathematics classrooms. Proceedings of the Tenth International Mathematics Education and Society Conference, (in press), Hyderabad, India.Google Scholar
  22. Wagner, D., & Herbel-Eisenmann, B. (2009). Re-mythologizing mathematics through attention to classroom positioning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72(1), 1–15.Google Scholar
  23. Wagner, D., & Herbel-Eisenmann, B. (2014). Identifying authority structures in mathematics classroom discourse: A case of a teacher’s early experience in a new context. ZDM, 46(6), 871–882.Google Scholar
  24. Wajnryb, R. (2005). Expletive deleted: A good look at bad language. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© FIZ Karlsruhe 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mathematics and Science EducationUniversity of South-Eastern Norway (USN)KongsbergNorway
  2. 2.Faculty of EducationUniversity of New BrunswickFrederictonCanada

Personalised recommendations