Prospective elementary school teachers (PTs) come to their mathematics courses fluent in using procedures for adding and subtracting multidigit whole numbers, but many are unaware of the essential features inherent in understanding the base-ten place-value system (i.e., grouping, place value, base). Understanding these features is crucial to understanding and teaching number and place value. The research aims of this paper are (1) to present a local instructional theory (LIT), designed to familiarize PTs with these features through comparison with historical number systems and (2) to present the effects of using the LIT in the PT classroom. A theory of learning (variation theory) is paired with a framework related to motivation (intellectual need) to illustrate the mutually supporting roles they may play in mathematical learning and task design. The LIT, a supporting task sequence, and the rationale for task design are shared. This theoretical contribution is then paired with evidence of PTs’ changing growth in their conceptions of whole number before and after courses leveraging this task sequence.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Adler, J. (2017). Foreword. In R. Huang & Y. Li (Eds.), Teaching and learning mathematics through variation: Confucian heritage meets western theories (pp. xi-xiv). Rotterdam: SensePublishers.
Ball, D. (1988). Knowledge and reasoning in mathematical pedagogy: Examining what prospective teachers bring to teacher education. (unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ann Arbor: Michigan State University.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (1999). How people learn. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Bussey, T. J., Orgill, M., & Crippen, K. J. (2013). Variation theory: A theory of learning and a useful theoretical framework for chemical education research. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(1), 9–22. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2RP20145C.
Cai, J., Morris, A., Hohensee, C., Hwang, S., Robison, V., & Hiebert, J. (2017). Making classroom implementation an integral part of research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 48(4), 342–347.
Chapman, O. (2007). Facilitating preservice teachers’ development of mathematics knowledge for teaching arithmetic operations. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10, 341–349.
Cobb, P., & Wheatley, G. (1988). Children’s initial understandings of ten. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 10(3), 1–28.
Coles, A., & Brown, L. (2016). Task design for ways of working: Making distinctions in teaching and learning mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 19(2), 149–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-015-9337-4.
Crespo, S., & Nicol, C. (2006). Challenging preservice teachers’ mathematical understanding: The case of division by zero. School Science and Mathematics, 106(2), 84–97.
Fuson, K. C. (1990). A forum for researchers: Issues in place-value and multidigit addition and subtraction learning and teaching. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21, 273–280.
Fuson, K. C., Wearne, D., Hiebert, J. C., Murray, H. G., Human, P. G., Olivier, A. I.,.. . Fennema, E. (1997). Children’s conceptual structures for multidigit numbers and methods of multidigit addition and subtraction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 130–162.
Graeber, A. O. (1999). Forms of knowing mathematics: What preservice teachers should learn. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 38(3), 189–208. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003624216201.
Gravemeijer, K. (2004). Local instruction theories as means of support for teachers in reform mathematics education. Mathematical Thinking and Learning: An International Journal, 6(2), 105–128.
Gravemeijer, K., & Cobb, P. (2006). Design research from the learning design perspective. In J. Van den Akker, K. Gravemerijer, S. McKenney & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 17–55). London: Routledge.
Gu, F., Huang, R., & Gu, L. (2017). Theory and development of teaching through variation in mathematics in china. In R. Haung & Y. Li (Eds.), Teaching and learning mathematics through variation (pp. 13–41). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Harel, G. (1998). Two dual assertions: The first on learning and the second on teaching (or vice versa). The American Mathematical Monthly, 105(6), 497–507. https://doi.org/10.2307/2589401.
Harel, G. (2013). Intellectual need. In K. R. Leatham (Ed.), Vital directions for mathematics education research (pp. 119–151). New York: Springer.
Harkness, S. S., & Thomas, J. (2008). Reflections on “multiplication as original sin”: The implications of using a case to help preservice teachers understand invented algorithms. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 27(2), 128–137.
Hart, J. (2010). Contextualized motivation theory (cmt): Intellectual passion, mathematical need, social responsibility, and personal agency in learning mathematics. (Ph.D.). Provo: Brigham Young University.
Hiebert, J., & Wearne, D. (1996). Instruction, understanding, and skill in multidigit addition and subtraction. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 251–283.
Holmqvist, M., Gustavsson, L., & Wernberg, A. (2008). Variation theory: An organizing principle to guide design research in education. In A. E. Kelly, R. Lesh & J. Y. Baek (Eds.), Handbook of Design Research Methods in Education (pp. 111–130). New York: Routledge.
Kaasila, R., Pehkonen, E., & Hellinen, A. (2010). Finnish pre-service teachers’ and upper secondary students’ understanding of division and reasoning strategies used. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 73(3), 247–261.
Kamii, C. (1986). Place value: An explanation of its difficulty and educational implications for the primary grades. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 1(2), 75–86.
Khoury, H. A., & Zazkis, R. (1994). On fractions and non-standard representations: Pre-service teachers’ concepts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 27(2), 191–204.
Kontorovich, I. (2015). Why do experts pose problems for mathematics competitions? In C. Bernack-Schüler, R. Erens, T. Leuders, & A. Eichler (Eds.), Views and beliefs in mathematics education: Results of the 19th mavi conference (pp. 171–181). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
Kontorovich, I., & Zazkis, R. (2016). Turn vs. Shape: Teachers cope with incompatible perspectives on angle. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 93, 1–21.
Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in china and the united states. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Marton, F., & Booth, S. A. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbuam Associates, Inc.
Marton, F., Runesson, U., & Tsui, A. B. (2004). The space of learning. In F. Marton & A. B. Tsui (Eds.), Classroom discourse and the space of learning (pp. 3–40). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Marton, F., Tsui, A. B., Chik, P. P., Ko, P. Y., & Lo, M. L. (2004). Classroom discourse and the space of learning. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
May, L. J. (1970). Teaching mathematics in the elementary grades. New York: The Free Press.
Menon, R. (2009). Preservice teachers’ subject matter knowledge of mathematics. The International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning. Retrieved from http://www.cimt.org.uk/journal/menon.pdf. Accessed 8 Aug 2018.
National Research Council (Ed.). (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Overbay, S. R., & Brod, M. J. (2007). Magic with mayan math. Teaching Mathematics in the Middle School, 12, 340–347.
Pang, M. F., Bao, J., & Ki, W. W. (2017). ‘Bianshi’ and the variation theory of learning. In R. Huang & Y. Li (Eds.), Teaching and learning mathematics through variation: Confucian heritage meets western theories (pp. 43–67). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Ross, S. (2001). Pre-service elementary teachers and place value: Written assessment using a digit-correspondence task. In R. Speiser, C. A. Maher, & C. N. Walter (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-third annual meeting of the north american chapter of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 2, pp. 897–906). Snowbird: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education.
Runesson, U. (2006). What is it possible to learn? On variation as a necessary condition for learning. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(4), 397–410.
Ryve, A., Larsson, M., & Nilsson, P. (2013). Analyzing content and participation in classroom discourse: Dimensions of variation, mediating tools, and conceptual accountability. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 57(1), 101–114.
Schwartz, D. L., & Bransford, J. D. (1998). A time for telling. Cognition and Instruction, 16(4), 475–5223.
Simon, M. (1993). Prospective elementary teachers’ knowledge of division. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24(3), 233–254.
Simon, M., & Blume, G. W. (1994). Mathematical modeling as a component of understanding ratio-as-measure: A study of prospective elementary teachers. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 13(2), 183–197.
Steffe, L. P., & Cobb, P. (1988). Construction of arithmetical meanings and strategies. New York: Springer.
Stylianides, A. J., & Stylianides, G. J. (2009). Proof constructions and evaluations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72(2), 237–253.
Thanheiser, E. (2009). Preservice elementary school teachers’ conceptions of multidigit whole numbers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(3), 251–281.
Thanheiser, E. (2010). Investigating further preservice teachers’ conceptions of multidigit whole numbers: Refining a framework. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75(3), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9252-7.
Thanheiser, E. (2014). Developing prospective teachers’ conceptions with well-designed tasks: Explaining successes and analyzing conceptual difficulties. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 18(2), 141–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-014-9272-9.
Thanheiser, E. (2018). Brief report: The effects of preservice elementary teachers’ accurate self-assessments in the context whole number. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 49, 39–56.
Thanheiser, E., Philipp, R., Fasteen, J., Strand, K., & Mills, B. (2013). Preservice-teacher interviews: A tool for motivating mathematics learning. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 1(2), 137–147. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteaceduc.1.2.0137.
The Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8.
Valeras, M., & Becker, J. (1997). Children’s developing understanding of place value: Semiotic aspects. Cognition and Instruction, 15, 265–286.
Woleck, K. R. (2003). Tricky triangles: A tale of one, two, three researchers. Teaching Children Mathematics, 10(1), 40.
Zazkis, R., & Campbell, S. (1996). Divisibility and multiplicative structure of natural numbers: Preservice teachers’ understanding. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 540–563.
Zazkis, R., & Khoury, H. A. (1993). Place value and rational number representations: Problem solving in the unfamiliar domain of non-decimals. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 15(1), 38–51.
About this article
Cite this article
Thanheiser, E., Melhuish, K. Leveraging variation of historical number systems to build understanding of the base-ten place-value system. ZDM Mathematics Education 51, 39–55 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0984-7
- Variation theory
- Intellectual need
- Whole number
- Prospective teachers
- Historical number systems
- Number and operation
- Place value
- Base ten