Randomness and distribution are important concepts underpinning the ability to think and reason probabilistically. Traditional approaches to teaching the Poisson distribution focus on mathematical definitions and formulae which obscure the randomness intrinsic in this process. Advances in technology have made it possible for students learning about probability to model the Poisson process. In this paper we explore the reasoning of six introductory probability students as they interacted with a prototype software designed to visibilize randomness, and to make transparent the link between the Poisson and exponential distributions. We focus on a task involving both real data and simulated data. Our findings highlight the fact that the tool and tasks seem to help students’ understanding of the link between the Poisson and exponential distributions, and to gain a deeper appreciation of distribution and randomness.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Bakker, A., & Gravemeijer, K. (2004). Learning to reason about distribution. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Eds.), The challenge of developing statistical literacy, reasoning and thinking (pp. 147–168). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Barton, D., & Lavery, C. (2012). Sigma statistics: NCEA level 3. Auckland: Pearson.
Batanero, C., Chernoff, E., Engel, J., Lee, H., & Sanchez, E. (2016). Research on teaching and learning probability. In Proceedings of topic study group 14 at the 13th international conference on mathematics education (ICME) (pp. 1–33). Hamburg, Germany. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31625-3_1.
Biehler, R. (1991). Computers in probability education. In R. Kapadia & M. Borovnick (Eds.), Chance encounters: Probability in education (pp. 169–211). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Blitzstein, J. K., & Hwang, J. (2014). Introduction to probability. New York: CRC Press.
Budgett, S., Pfannkuch, M., Regan, M., & Wild, C. J. (2013). Dynamic visualizations and the randomization test. Technology Innovations in Statistics Education, 7(2), 1–21.
Chance, B., Ben-Zvi, D., Garfield, J., & Medina, E. (2007). The role of technology in improving student learning of statistics. Technology Innovations in Statistics Education, 1(1), 1–26.
Chance, B., del Mas, R., & Garfield, J. (2004). Reasoning about sampling distributions. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Eds.), The challenge of developing statistical literacy, reasoning and thinking (pp. 295–323). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Chaput, B., Girard, J. C., & Henry, M. (2011). Frequentist approach: Modeling and simulation in statistics and probability teaching. In C. Batanero, G. Burrill & C. Reading (Eds.), Teaching statistics in school mathematics - Challenges for teachers and teacher education. A joint ICMI/IASE study: The 18th ICMI Study (pp. 85–95). New York: Springer.
Chernoff, E. J., & Sriraman, B. (Eds.). (2014). Probabilistic thinking: Presenting plural perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.
Chu, S. (2003). Using soccer goals to motivate Poisson process. INFORMS Transactions on Education, 3(2), 64–70.
Cobb, G., & Moore, D. (1997). Mathematics, statistics and teaching. The American Mathematical Monthly, 104(9), 801–823.
Cobb, P., & McClain, K. (2004). Principles of instructional design for supporting the development of students’ statistical reasoning. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Eds.), The challenge of developing statistical literacy, reasoning and thinking (pp. 375–396). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Eichler, A., & Vogel, M. (2014). Three approaches for modelling situations with randomness. In E. J. Chernoff & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Probabilistic thinking: Presenting plural perspectives (pp. 75–99). Dordrecht: Springer.
English, L. D., & Watson, J. M. (2016). Development of probabilistic understanding in fourth grade. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 47(1), 28–62.
Garfield, J., delMas, R., & Zieffler, A. (2012). Developing statistical modelers and thinkers in an introductory, tertiary-level statistics course. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 44(7), 883–898.
Johnson, R. W. (2017). Discovering patterns in interarrival data. Teaching Statistics, 39(2), 42–46.
Johnston-Wilder, P., & Pratt, D. (2007). The relationship between local and global perspectives on randomness. In D. Pitta & G. Philippou (Eds.), Proceedings of the fifth European conference on research in mathematics education. Larnaca: ERME.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Allen Lane.
Kazak, S., Fujita, T., & Wegerif, R. (2016). Students’ informal inference about the binomial distribution of “bunny hops”: A dialogic perspective. Statistics Education Research Journal, 15(2), 46–61.
Konold, C., Higgins, T., Russell, S. J., & Khalil, K. (2015). Data seen through different lenses. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 88(3), 305–325.
Konold, C., & Kazak, S. (2008). Reconnecting data and chance. Technology Innovations in Statistics Education, 2(1). http://repositories.cdlib.org/uclastat/cts/tise/vol2/iss1/art1/
Konold, C., Madden, S., Pollatsek, A., Pfannkuch, M., Wild, C., Ziedins, I., Finzer, W., Horton, N. J., & Kazak, S. (2011). Conceptual challenges in coordinating theoretical and data-centered estimates of probability. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 13(1&2), 68–86.
Lane, D. M., & Peres, S. C. (2006). Interactive simulations in the teaching of statistics: promise and pitfalls. In A. Rossman & B. Chance (Eds.), Proceedings of the seventh international conference on teaching statistics, Salvador, Brazil. Voorburg: International Statistical Institute..
Lee, H. S., & Lee, J. T. (2009). Reasoning about probabilistic phenomena: Lessons learned and applied in software design. Technology Innovations in Statistics Education, 3(2), 1–22.
MacGillivray, H. (2006). Using data, student experiences and collaboration in developing probabilistic reasoning at the introductory tertiary level. In A. Rossman & B. Chance (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th international conference on teaching statistics, Salvador, Brazil. Voorburg: International Statistical Institute.
Makar, K., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2011). The role of context in developing reasoning about informal statistical inference. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4(3), 1–4.
Martignon, L., & Krauss, S. (2009). Hands-on activities for fourth graders: A tool box for decision-making and reckoning with risk. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(3), 117–148.
Nickerson, R. S. (2002). The production and perception of randomness. Psychological Review, 109(2), 330–357.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. London: Sage.
Peres, S. C., Lane, D. M., & Griggs, K. R. (2010). Using simulations for active learning: the query-first method in practice. In C. Reading (Ed.), Data and context in statistics education: Towards an evidence-based society. Proceedings of the eighth international conference on teaching statistics, Ljubljana, Slovenia. Voorburg: International Statistical Institute.
Pfannkuch, M., & Budgett, S. (2016). Markov processes: Exploring the use of dynamic visualizations to enhance student understanding. Journal of Statistics Education, 24(2), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2016.1207404.
Pfannkuch, M., Budgett, S., Fewster, R., Fitch, M., Pattenwise, S., Wild, C., & Ziedins, I. (2016). Probability modelling and thinking: What can we learn from practice? Statistics Education Research Journal, 15(2), 11–37.
Pfannkuch, M., & Ziedins, I. (2014). A modelling perspective on probability. In E. J. Chernoff & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Probabilistic thinking: Presenting plural perspectives (pp. 101–116). New York: Springer.
Poisson, S. D. (1837). Recherches sur la probabilité des jugements en matiere criminelle et en matière civile, précédées des règles générales du calcul des probabilités. Paris: Bachelier.
Pratt, D. (2000). Making sense of the total of two dice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(5), 602–625.
Pratt, D. (2011). Re-connecting probability and reasoning from data in secondary school teaching. In Proceedings of the 58th international statistical institute world statistics congress (pp. 890–899). The Hague, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute.
Ross, S. M. (2010). Introduction to probability models. Burlington: Academic Press.
Schoenfeld, A. (2007). Method. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 96–107). Charlotte: Information Age Publishers.
Shaughnessy, J. M. (2014). Commentary on the chapters on probability from a stochastic perspective. In E. J. Chernoff & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Probabilistic thinking: Presenting plural perspectives (pp. 481–489). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7155-0_25.
Taleb, N. N. (2005). Fooled by randomness. New York: Random House.
Thomas, M. O. (2008). Conceptual representations and versatile mathematical thinking. In Proceedings of the tenth international congress in mathematics education (pp. 1–18). Copenhagen, Denmark.
von Bortkewitsch, L. (1898). Das Gesetz der Kleinen Zahlen. Leipzig: Teubner.
This work is supported by a grant from the Teaching and Learning Research Initiative (tlri.org.nz).
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
About this article
Cite this article
Budgett, S., Pfannkuch, M. Modeling and linking the Poisson and exponential distributions. ZDM Mathematics Education 50, 1281–1294 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0957-x
- Poisson process