, Volume 50, Issue 1–2, pp 173–185 | Cite as

Developing a mathematical modelling course in a virtual learning environment

  • Daniel Clark Orey
  • Milton Rosa
Original Article


This study was conducted during the first semester of 2016, from March 21st to June 30th, with 104 students, in eight educational centers or polos, in the states of Minas Gerais and São Paulo. Previously, these mathematics teacher education students had no opportunity to study in higher education in Brazil. They were enrolled in a Mathematical Modelling course, as part of the Universidade Aberta do Brasil (UAB), which is the Brazilian open university, at the Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP). All stages of this study were performed in accordance with case study methodological procedures, which covered data collection and analysis. The interpretation of the results was accomplished through the development of categories, which emerged from collected qualitative data at the completion of the fieldwork. These procedures helped the researchers to answer the research question: How can technological resources available in a Virtual Learning Environment (VLE) help students to interact and collaboratively develop mathematical modelling projects that assist them in solving problems they face in daily life? One important claim for mathematical modelling in a VLE is to favor the development of students in their interaction and collaboration in solving problems they face daily, by elaborating modelling projects through the use of technological resources available in this environment. By developing these projects, students learned to problematize, contextualize, and investigate problems. As well, they prepared questions that aimed to seek, collect, select, organize, and handle the information that allowed them to reflect critically about the role of mathematics in their own context. The results from this study show that the development of modelling projects in a VLE helped students to interact and collaboratively inquire and investigate their chosen theme in accordance with their own interests and reality.


Case study Mathematical models Mathematical modelling Modelling projects Virtual learning environments 


  1. Balaji, M. S., & Chakrabarti, D. (2010). Student interactions in online discussion forum: Empirical research from ‘media richness theory’ perspective. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 9(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
  2. Borba, M. C. (2012). Humans-with-media and continuing education for mathematics teachers in online environments. ZDM Mathematics Education, 44(6), 801–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Borba, M. C., & Llinares, S. (2012). Online mathematics teacher education: Overview of an emergent field of research. ZDM Mathematics Education, 44(6), 697–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borba, M. C., Malheiros, A. P. S., & Zulatto, R. B. A. (2010). Online distance education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. Borba, M. C., & Villarreal, M. E. (2005). Humans-with-media and the reorganization of mathematical thinking: Information and communication technologies, modeling, visualization and experimentation. New York, NY: Springer Science + Business Media.Google Scholar
  6. Clark, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2011). E-learning and the science of instruction [electronic resource]: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cottrell, S., & Donaldson, J. H. (2013). Exploring the opinions of registered nurses working in a clinical transfusion environment on the contribution of e-learning to personal learning and clinical practice: results of a small scale educational research study. Nurse Education in Practice, 13(3), 221–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  9. Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  10. Dillenbourg, P. (2000). Virtual learning environments. In Proceedings of the EUN Conference 2000—Learning in the new millennium: building new education strategies form schools (pp. 1–30). Geneva, Switzerland: EUN Conference.Google Scholar
  11. Greefrath, G., & Rieβ, M. (2013). Reality based test tasks with digital tools at lower secondary. In G. A. Stillman & G. Kaiser Blum, W., & J. P. Brown (Eds.), Teaching mathematical modelling: Connecting to research and practice (pp. 445–456). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Haris, D. (2017). Developing a virtual learning environment on Indonesian version of realística mathematics education. In: The 2nd Annual International Seminar on Transformative Education and Educational Leadership (AISTEEL-2017). Medan City, Indonesia: Universitas Negeri Medam. Retrieved from Accessed on 3 Oct 2017.
  14. Holloway, I. (1997). Basic concepts for qualitative research. London: Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
  15. Kerr, S. J., Neale, H. R., & Cobb, S. V. (2002). Virtual environments for social skills training: The importance of scaffolding in practice. In Proceedings of the Fifth International ACM SIGCAPH Conference on Assistive Technologies (pp. 104–110). New York, NY: ACM Press.Google Scholar
  16. Malheiros, A. P. (2008). Educação matemática online: A elaboração de projetos de Modelagem (Online mathematics education: elaborating modelling projects). Unpublished PhD dissertation. Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brazil: UNESP.Google Scholar
  17. Moore, M. G. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education (pp. 22–38). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2005). Distance education: A system view. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  19. O’Reilly, M., & Parker, N. (2012). Unsatisfactory saturation: a critical exploration of the notion of saturated sample sizes in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, [online], 13(2), 190–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Parra-Zapata, M., Rendón-Mesa, P., Molina-Toro, J., Sánchez-Cardona, J., Ocampo-Arenas, M., & Villa-Ochoa, J. (2017). Participación de profesores en un ambiente de formación online. Ejemplo de un diseño em modelación matemática. Revista Virtual Universidad Católica del Norte, 50 (Febrero-Mayo), 3–20.Google Scholar
  21. Pereira, R. S. G. (2015). A educação a distância e a formação continuada de professores de matemática: contribuições de um contexto formativo para a base de conhecimento docente [Distance education and continuing education of mathematics teachers: Contributions of a formative context to the teacher knowledge base]. Doctorate in Mathematics Education. Presidente Prudente: UNESP.Google Scholar
  22. Reese, S. A. (2015). Online learning environments in higher education: Connectivism vs. dissociation. Education and Information Technologies, 20(3), 579–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rosa, M. (2000). From reality to mathematical modelling: A proposal for using ethnomathematical knowledge. College of Education. Sacramento, CA: California State University, Sacramento (CSUS).Google Scholar
  24. Rosa, M., & Orey, D. C. (2016). Developing mathematical modelling in virtual learning environments by applying critical and reflective dimensions. In K. Wallace (Ed.), Learning environments: Emerging theories, applications and future directions (pp. 1–20). New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  25. Rosa, M., & Orey, D. C. (2017). Mathematical modelling in a long-distance teacher education in Brazil: Democratizing mathematics. In G. Stillman & A. Blum, W., & G. Kaiser (Eds.), Mathematical modelling and applications: Crossing and researching boundaries in mathematics education. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  26. Shepherd, C., Bolliger, D., Dousay, T., & Persichitte, K. (2016). Preparing teachers for online instruction with a graduate certificate program. TechTrends, 60(1), 41–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Silva, N., Costa, G. J. M., Rogerson, S., & Prior, M. (2007). Knowledge or content? The philosophical boundaries in e-learning pedagogical theories: Research, reflections and innovations in integrating ICT in education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Silverman, J. (2011). Supporting the development of mathematical knowledge for teaching through online asynchronous collaboration. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 30(1), 61–78.Google Scholar
  29. Silverman, J. (2012). Exploring the relationship between teachers prominence in online collaboration and the development of mathematical content knowledge for teaching. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 20(1), 47–69.Google Scholar
  30. Silverstone, S., & Keeler, J. (2013). Engaging students in online marketing classes. Global Conference on Business and Finance Proceedings, 8(2), 14–24.Google Scholar
  31. Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  32. Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© FIZ Karlsruhe 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidade Federal de Ouro PretoOuro PretoBrazil

Personalised recommendations