Abstract
Using an actor-oriented perspective on transfer, we report a case of a student’s transfer of covariational reasoning across tasks involving different backgrounds and features. In this study, we investigated the research question: How might a student’s covariational reasoning on Ferris wheel tasks, involving attributes of distance, width, and height, influence a student’s covariational reasoning on filling bottle tasks, involving attributes of volume and height? The student transferred covariational reasoning that she employed on Ferris wheel tasks to filling bottle tasks; yet, her covariational reasoning on filling bottle tasks was less advanced. When designing a sequence of tasks intended to engender students’ covariational reasoning, we recommend that researchers begin by using situations consisting of “simpler” attributes, such as height and distance, which students may more readily conceive of as being possible to measure. By taking into account students’ conceptions of task features, researchers can promote transfer of complex forms of mathematical reasoning, such as covariational reasoning.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Carlson, M. P., Jacobs, S., Coe, E., Larsen, S., & Hsu, E. (2002). Applying covariational reasoning while modeling dynamic events: A framework and a study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(5), 352–378.
Castillo-Garsow, C. (2012). Continuous quantitative reasoning. In R. Mayes & L. L. Hatfield (Eds.), Quantitative reasoning and mathematical modeling: A driver for STEM integrated education and teaching in context (Vol. 2, pp. 55–73). Laramie, WY: University of Wyoming College of Education.
Castillo-Garsow, C., Johnson, H. L., & Moore, K. C. (2013). Chunky and smooth images of change. For the Learning of Mathematics, 33(3), 31–37.
Confrey, J., & Smith, E. (1995). Splitting, covariation, and their role in the development of exponential functions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(1), 66–86.
Ellis, A. B., Özgür, Z., Kulow, T., Dogan, M. F., & Amidon, J. (2016). An exponential growth learning trajectory: Students’ emerging understanding of exponential growth through covariation. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 18(3), 151–181.
Ellis, A. B., Özgür, Z., Kulow, T., Williams, C., & Amidon, J. (2015). Quantifying exponential growth: Three conceptual shifts in coordinating multiplicative and additive growth. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 39, 131–155.
Johnson, H. L. (2012). Reasoning about variation in the intensity of change in covarying quantities involved in rate of change. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31(3), 313–330.
Johnson, H. L. (2013). Designing covariation tasks to support students reasoning about quantities involved in rate of change. In C. Margolinas (Ed.), Task design in mathematics education. Proceedings of ICMI Study 22 (Vol. 1, pp. 213–222). Oxford.
Johnson, H. L. (2014). A role of context in constructivist model building: What problem is the learner solving? Constructivist Foundations, 9(3), 339–341.
Johnson, H. L. (2015a). Secondary students’ quantification of ratio and rate: A framework for reasoning about change in covarying quantities. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 17(1), 64–90.
Johnson, H. L. (2015b). Task design: Fostering secondary students’ shifts from variational to covariational reasoning. In K. Beswick, T. Muir & J. Wells (Eds.), Proceedings of the 39th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 129–136). Hobart, Tasmania: University of Tasmania.
Kaput, J. J., & Roschelle, J. (1999). The mathematics of change and variation from a millenial perspective: New content, new context. In C. Hoyles, C. Morgan & G. Woodhouse (Eds.), Rethinking the mathematics curriculum (pp. 155–170). London: Falmer Press.
Lobato, J. (2003). How design experiments can inform a rethinking of transfer and vice versa. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 17–20.
Lobato, J. (2008). When students don’t apply the knowledge that you think they have, rethink your assumptions about transfer. In M. P. Carlson & C. Rasmussen (Eds.), Making the connection: Research and teaching in undergraduate mathematics education (pp. 289–304). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
Lobato, J. (2012). The actor-oriented transfer perspective and its contributions to educational research and practice. Educational Psychologist, 47(3), 232–247.
Marton, F. (2015). Necessary conditions of learning. New York: Routledge.
Moore, K. C. (2014). Quantitative reasoning and the sine function: The case of Zac. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45(1), 102–138.
Moore, K. C., & Carlson, M. P. (2012). Students’ images of problem contexts when solving applied problems. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31(1), 48–59.
Moore, K. C., Paoletti, T., & Musgrave, S. (2013). Covariational reasoning and invariance among coordinate systems. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(3), 461–473.
Moore, K. C., Silverman, J., Paoletti, T., & LaForest, K. (2014). Breaking conventions to support quantitative reasoning. Mathematics Teacher Education, 2(2), 141–157.
Oehrtman, M., Carlson, M. P., & Thompson, P. W. (2008). Foundational reasoning abilities that promote coherence in students’ function understanding. In M. P. Carlson & C. Rasmussen (Eds.), Making the connection: Research and teaching in undergraduate mathematics education (pp. 27–42). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
Saldanha, L., & Thompson, P. W. (1998). Re-thinking covariation from a quantitative perspective: Simultaneous continuous variation. In S. B. Berenson, K. R. Dawkins, M. Blanton, W. N. Coloumbe, J. Kolb, K. Norwood & L. Stiff (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th annual meeting of the Psychology of Mathematics Education North American Chapter (Vol. 1, pp. 298–303). Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University.
Shell Centre for Mathematical Education (University of Nottingham). (1985). The language of functions and graphs: An examination module for secondary schools. Nottingham, UK: JMB/Shell Centre for Mathematical Education.
Sierpinska, A. (2004). Research in mathematics education through a keyhole: Task problematization. For the Learning of Mathematics, 24(2), 7–15.
Stake, R. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 443–466). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Stalvey, H. E., & Vidakovic, D. (2015). Students’ reasoning about relationships between variables in a real-world problem. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 40, 192–210.
Thompson, P. W. (1993). Quantitative reasoning, complexity, and additive structures. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 25, 165–208.
Thompson, P. W. (1994). The development of the concept of speed and its relationship to concepts of rate. In G. Harel & J. Confrey (Eds.), The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics (pp. 181–234). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Thompson, P. W. (2002). Didactic objects and didactic models in radical constructivism. In K. Gravemeijer, R. Lehrer, B. van Oers & L. Verschaffel (Eds.), Symbolizing, modeling, and tool use in mathematics education. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Thompson, P. W. (2011). Quantitative reasoning and mathematical modeling. In S. A. Chamberlain & L. L. Hatfield (Eds.), New perspectives and directions for collaborative research in mathematics education: Papers from a planning conference for wisdom^e (Vol. 1, pp. 33–56). Laramie, WY: University of Wyoming College of Education.
Thompson, P. W., & Carlson, M. P. (2017). Variation, covariation and functions: Foundational ways of mathematical thinking. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 421–456). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Watson, A. (2016). Parameters for practice and research in task design in mathematics education. Paper presented at the 13th International Congress on Mathematical Education, Hamburg, Germany.
Yin, R. K. (2006). Case study methods. In J. L. Green, G. Camilli & P. B. Elmore (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 111–122). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported in part by a Faculty Development Grant from the University of Colorado Denver. Opinions, findings, and conclusions are those of the authors. We thank Patrick Thompson and Reviewers for their comments on previous versions of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Johnson, H.L., McClintock, E. & Hornbein, P. Ferris wheels and filling bottles: a case of a student’s transfer of covariational reasoning across tasks with different backgrounds and features. ZDM Mathematics Education 49, 851–864 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0866-4
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0866-4