Skip to main content
Log in

How are questions that students ask in high level mathematics classes linked to general giftedness?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
ZDM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a part of a larger study, in which we asked “How are learning and teaching of mathematics at high level linked to students’ general giftedness?” We consider asking questions, especially student-generated questions, as indicators of quality of instructional interactions. In the part of the study presented in this paper, we explore instructional interactions in two high-school classes for mathematically promising students with specific focus on questions that students ask. The first class included generally gifted students (IQ ≥130) who were motivated to study mathematics at a high level (hereafter, a gifted class), and the second class included students characterized by high motivation regardless of their IQs (hereafter, motivation class). We analysed questions asked by the students during algebra and geometry lessons. Two types of questions are considered: elaboration and clarification. We found that students in a gifted class mostly asked elaboration questions, whereas students in a motivation class mostly asked clarification questions. We connect the revealed inclination to ask elaboration questions with intellectual curiosity that characterizes generally gifted students. Accordingly, we suggest that in classes of students who are motivated to study mathematics at high level, students who are generally gifted may create mathematical discourse of higher quality. We also argue that the identified differences in students’ questions observed in classes of different types are not only student-dependent (i.e. depend on the students’ levels of general giftedness) but can also be teacher-related and content-related.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Gifted classes in regular Israeli secondary schools operate in the framework of a special program of the Ministry of Education (see http://cms.education.gov.il/EducationCMS/Units/Gifted/English).

  2. Motivation classes, such as the one that took part in our study, operate in Israel within different projects. The class that took part in our study operated under the auspices of the MOFET project. MOFET is an Israeli public association that provides methodological and pedagogical support to regular schools interested in attracting and nurturing STEM-oriented students (see http://www.reshetmofet.org/en/ for project details).

References

  • Almeida, A. P. (2012). Can I ask a question? The importance of classroom questioning. ProcediaSocial and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 634–638.

  • Bauersfeld, H. (1988). Interaction, construction, and knowledge: Alternative perspectives for mathematics education. In D. A. Grouws & T. J. Cooney (Eds.), Perspectives on research on effective mathematicsteaching (Vol. 1, pp. 27–46). Reston: NCTM.

  • Chin, C. (2004). Students’ questions: Fostering a culture of inquisitiveness in science classrooms. School Science Review, 86(314), 107–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin, C., & Kayalvizhi, G. (2005). What do pupils think of open science investigations? A study of Singaporean primary 6 pupils. Educational Research, 47(1), 107–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2008). Students’ questions: A potential resource for teaching and learning science. Studies in Science Education, 44(1), 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colangelo, N., & Davis, G. A. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and BacOn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G. A., & Rimm, S. (2004). Education of the gifted and talented (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn and BacOn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston: D.C. Heath and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1944). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dey, I. (1999). Grounding grounded theory: Guidelines for qualitative inquiry. San Diego: Academic Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, M. S., & Bransford, J. D. (Eds.). (2005). How students learn: Science in the classroom. Washington D.C.: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman, E. A., & Ansell, E. (2001). The multiple voices of a mathematics classroom community. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46(1), 115–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • House, P. A. (Ed.). (1987). Providing opportunities for the mathematically gifted K—12. Reston: NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Intel Teach Program (2016). Designing effective projects: questioning—The Socratic questioning technique. Retrieved on May 14, 2016 from http://www.intel.com/

  • Kilpatrick, J. (2014). History of research in mathematics education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 267–272). Berlin: Springer (Electronic Version).

  • Knuth, E. (2002). Fostering mathematical curiosity. Mathematics Teacher, 95, 126–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leder, G. (2012). Looking for gold: Catering for mathematically gifted students within and beyond ZDM. In H. Forgasz & S. F. Rivera (Eds.), Toward equity: Gender, culture, and diversity (pp. 389–406). Advances in Mathematics Education Series, Part 3. Dordrecht: Springer.

  • Leikin, R. (2005). Qualities of professional dialog: Connecting graduate research on teaching and the undergraduate teachers’ program. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 36(1–2), 237–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leikin, R. (2014). Giftedness and high ability in mathematics. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education. Electronic Version: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leikin, R. & Berman, A. (2015). Mathematics for students with high mathematical potential in Israel. In B. R. Vogeli (Ed.), Special secondary schools for the mathematically talented: An international panorama (pp. 117–143). Series on Mathematics Education (Vol. 12). Denver: World Scientific.

  • Leikin, R., & Dinur, S. (2007). Teacher flexibility in mathematical discussion. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 26(4), 328–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leikin, R., & Lev, M. (2013). Mathematical creativity in generally gifted and mathematically excelling adolescents: What makes the difference? ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(2), 183–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leikin, R., Waisman, I., & Leikin, M. (2016). Does solving insight-based problems differ from solving learning-based problems? Some evidence from an ERP study. ZDM, 48(3), 305–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marzano, R. J., Brandt, R. S., Hughes, C. S., Jones, B. F., Presseisen, B. Z., Rankine, S. C., et al. (1988). Dimensions of thinking: A framework for curriculum and instruction. Alexandria Va.: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mönks, F. J., Pflüger, R., & Nijmegen, Radboud Universiteit. (2005). Gifted education in 21 European countries: Inventory and perspective. Nijmegen: Radboud University.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (1995). Report of the NCTM task force on the mathematically promising. NCTM News Bulletin, 32.

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: NCTM.

  • Pedrosa de Jesus, M. H., Teixeira-Dias, J. J. C., & Watts, M. (2003). Questions of chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 1015–1034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renzulli, J. S. (1986). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 332–357). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenshine, B., Meister, C., & Chapman, S. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66(2), 181–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (1996). When paradigms clash: Comments on Cameron and Pierce’s claim that rewards do not undermine intrinsic motivation. Review of Educational Research, 66(1), 33–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97–118). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sfard, A. (2001). There is more to discourse than meets the ears: Looking at thinking as communicating to learn more about mathematical learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46(1), 13–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sfard, A., & Prusak, A. (2005). Telling identities: In search of an analytic tool for investigating learning as a culturally shaped activity. Educational Researcher, 34(4), 14–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheffield, L. J. (Ed.). (1999). Developing mathematically promising students. Reston: NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheffield, L. J. (2012). Mathematically gifted, talented, or promising: What difference does it make? The paper presented at the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education.

  • Shodell, M. (1995). The question-driven classroom. American Biology Teachers, 57(5), 278–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subotnik, R. F., Pillmeier, E., & Jarvin, L. (2009). The psychosocial dimensions of creativity in mathematics: Implications for gifted education policy. In R. Leikin, A. Berman & B. Koichu (Eds.), Creativity in mathematics and the education of gifted students (pp. 165–179).‏ The Netherland: Sense.

  • Tobin, K., & Tippins, D. (1993). Constructivism as a referent for teaching and learning. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education (pp. 3–21). Washington, DC: AAAS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogeli, B. R. (Ed.). (2015). Special secondary schools for the mathematically talented: An international panorama. Series on Mathematics Education (Vol. 12). Denver: World Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voigt, J. (1995). Thematic patterns of interactions and sociomathematical norms. In P. Cobb & H. Bauersfeld (Eds.), Emergence of mathematical meaning: Interactions in classroom culture (pp. 163–201). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, D. M. & Alsop, S. (1996). The QUESTCUP Project: a study of pupils’ questions for conceptual understanding. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, New York, April

  • Wood, T. (1998). Alternative patterns of communication in mathematics classes: Funneling or focusing. In H. Steinbring, A. Sierpinska & M. G. Bartolini-Bussi (Eds.), Language and communication in the mathematics classroom (pp. 167–178). Reston: NCTM.

  • Zoller, U. (1987). The fostering of question-asking capability: A meaningful aspect of problem-solving in chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 64, 510–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roza Leikin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Leikin, R., Koichu, B., Berman, A. et al. How are questions that students ask in high level mathematics classes linked to general giftedness?. ZDM Mathematics Education 49, 65–80 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0815-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0815-7

Keywords

Navigation