Abstract
In this commentary we take a critical look at the various studies being reported in this issue about the relationship between cognitive neuroscience and mathematics, from a mathematics education viewpoint. After a discussion of the individual contributions, which we have grouped into three categories—namely neuroscientific studies of (a) children’s numerical magnitude representation, (b) arithmetical thinking, and (c) more advanced mathematical thinking—and which nicely document the scientific progression being made within the domain of educational neuroscience applied to the domain of mathematics education during the last 5 years, we point to some general caveats that should be considered in future research.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acevedo Nistal, A., Van Dooren, W., Clarebout, G., Elen, J., & Verschaffel, L. (2009). Conceptualising, investigating and stimulating representational flexibility in mathematical problem solving and learning: a critical review. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41, 627–636.
Babai, R., Nattiv, L., & Stavy, R. (2016). Comparison of perimeters: Improving students’ performance by increasing the salience of the relevant variable. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48(3), this issue.
Carey, S. (2004). Bootstrapping & the origin of concepts. Daedalus, 133, 59–68.
Christou, K. P., Vosniadou, S., & Vamvakoussi, X. (2007). Students’ interpretations of literal symbols in algebra. In S. Vosniadou, A. Baltas, & X. Vamvakoussi (Eds.), Re-framing the conceptual change approach in learning and instruction (pp. 283–297). Oxford: Elsevier.
De Corte, E., Mason, L., Depaepe, F., & Verschaffel, L. (2011). Self-regulated learning of mathematical knowledge and skills. In B. Zimmerman & D. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 155–172). Oxford: Routledge.
De Corte, E., Verschaffel, L., & Lowyck, J. (1994). Computers and learning. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of education (2nd ed., pp. 1002–1007). Oxford: Pergamon.
De Smedt, B, & Grabner, R. (2015). Applications of neuroscience to mathematics education. In R. Cohen Kadosh & A. Dowker (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of numerical cognition (pp. 612–632). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
De Smedt, B., Noël, M., Gilmore, C., & Ansari, D. (2013). How do symbolic and non-symbolic numerical magnitude processing skills relate to individual differences in children’s mathematical skills? A review of evidence from brain and behavior. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 2, 48–55.
De Smedt, B., & Verschaffel, L. (2010). Traveling down the road: from cognitive neuroscience to mathematics education … and back. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 42, 649–652.
Elia, I., Panaoura, A., Eracleous, A., & Gagatsis, A. (2007). Relations between secondary pupils’ conceptions about functions and problem solving in different representations. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5, 533–556.
English, L. D., & Mulligan, J. T. (Eds.). (2013). Reconceptualising early mathematics learning. (Series Advances in Mathematics Education). New York: Springer.
Fischbein, E. (1987). Intuition in Science and Mathematics: An educational approach. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Gillard, E., Van Dooren, W., Schaeken, W., & Verschaffel, L. (2009). Dual-processes in the psychology of mathematics education and cognitive psychology. Human Development, 52, 95–108.
Leibovich, T., & Ansari, D. (2016) The symbol-grounding problem in numerical cognition: a review of theory, evidence and outstanding questions. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology (Special Section on Numerical Cognition, edited by Jamie Campbell), 70, 12–23.
Leikin, R., Waisman, I., & Leikin, M. (2016). Does solving insight-based problems differ from solving learning-based problems? Some evidence from an ERP study. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48(3), this issue.
Leron, U., & Hazzan, O. (2006). The rationality debate: Application of cognitive psychology to mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 62, 105–126.
Leron, U., & Hazzan, O. (2009). Intuitive vs. analytical thinking: Four perspectives. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71, 263–278.
Merenluoto, K., & Lehtinen, E. (2004). Number concept and conceptual change: towards a systemic model of the processes of change. Learning and Instruction, 14, 519–534.
Merkley, R., Shimi, A., & Scerif, G. (2016). Electrophysiological markers of newly acquired symbolic numerical representations: the role of magnitude and ordinal information. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48(3), this issue.
Müller, G., Selter, C., & Wittmann, E. C. (2012). Zahlen, Muster und Strukturen - Spielräume für aktives Lernen und Üben. Stuttgart: Klett.
Obersteiner, A., & Tumpek, C. (2016). Measuring fraction comparison strategies with eye‑tracking. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48(3), this issue.
Pollack, C., Guerrero, S. L., & Star, J. R. (2016). Exploring mental representations for literal symbols using priming and comparison distance effects. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48(3), this issue.
Schillinger, F. L., De Smedt, B., & Grabner, R. H. (2016). When errors count: an EEG study on numerical error monitoring under performance pressure. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48(3), this issue.
Schneider, M., Beeres, K., Coban, L., Merz, S., Schmidt, S. S., Stricker, J., & De Smedt, B. (2016). Associations of non-symbolic and symbolic numerical magnitude processing with mathematical competence: A meta-analysis. Developmental Science (in press).
Schneider, M., Grabner, R. H., & Paetsch, J. (2009). Mental number line, number line estimation, and mathematical achievement: Their interrelations in grades 5 and 6. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 359–372.
Siegler, R. S., & Booth, J. L. (2004). Development of numerical estimation in young children. Child Development, 75, 428–444.
Spüler, M., Walter, C., Rosenstiel, W., Gerjets, P., Moeller, K., & Klein, E. (2016). EEG‑based prediction of cognitive workload induced by arithmetic: a step towards online adaptation in numerical learning. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48(3), this issue.
Stern, E., & Schneider, M. (2010). A digital road map analogy of the relationship between neuroscience and educational research. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 42(6), 511–514.
Thomas, H. B. G. (1963). Communication theory and the constellation hypothesis of calculation. Querterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 15, 173–191.
Torbeyns, J., Obersteiner, A., & Verschaffel, L. (2012). Number sense in early and elementary mathematics education. Yearbook of the Department of Early Childhood Studies (Vol. 5, pp. 60–75). Ioannina: University of Ioannina.
Verschaffel, L. (2014, April). “It’s all about strategies, stupid”. Invited Introduction to the theme “Arithmetic strategies” at the “Sixth Expert Meeting on Mathematical Thinking and Learning”, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Verschaffel, L., Greer, B., & De Corte, E. (2007). Whole number concepts and operations. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 557–628). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.
Vogel, S. E., Keller, C., Koschutnig, K., Reishofer, G., Ebner, F., Dohle, S., Siegrist, M., & Grabner, R. H. (2016). The neural correlates of health risk perception in individuals with low and high numeracy. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48(3), this issue.
Waisman, I., Leikin, M., & Leikin, R. (2016). Brain activity associated with logical inferences in geometry: Focusing on students with different levels of ability. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48(3), this issue.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Verschaffel, L., Lehtinen, E. & Van Dooren, W. Neuroscientific studies of mathematical thinking and learning: a critical look from a mathematics education viewpoint. ZDM Mathematics Education 48, 385–391 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0781-0
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0781-0