ZDM

, Volume 48, Issue 4, pp 485–499 | Cite as

Revitalising mathematics classroom teaching through Lesson Study (LS): a Malaysian case study

Original Article

Abstract

This paper discusses how implementation of Lesson Study (LS) has brought about evolving changes in the quality of mathematics classroom teaching in one Chinese primary school. The Japanese model of LS was adapted as a teacher professional development to improve mathematics teachers’ teaching practices. The LS group consisted of five mathematics teachers. Data were collected through video recording of lesson observations, reflection and interviews with the teachers and selected pupils. Altogether five lessons were recorded: one each before and after commencing the Lesson Study; as well as one research lesson for each of the three Lesson Study cycles. In this study, the well-known Interconnected Model of Teacher Growth was used as the analytical framework to observe teacher change in the iterative processes of enactment and reflection between the four domains: external domain, teachers’ personal domain, the domain of practice and the domain of consequence. Analysis of the results show five observed changes in teaching practices: (a) innovative use of teaching materials; (b) choice and sequencing of learning tasks; (c) empowering pupils to create questions; (d) resizing the group; and (e) better teacher engagement. These results showed that there were connections among the four domains; and the dynamic enactment and reflection shared by the most to the least experienced teachers was evident of teacher growth.

Keywords

Case study Classroom practice Lesson Study Primary mathematics teaching Malaysian education 

References

  1. Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teacher and Teacher Education, 18, 947–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Clarke, D. J., & Peter, A. (1993). Modelling teacher change. In B. Atweh, C. Kanes, M. Carss, & G. Booker (Eds.), Contexts in mathematics education. Proceedings of the 16th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (MERGA). Queensland: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. doi:10.1007/s10857-009-9102-7.Google Scholar
  3. Doig, B., & Groves, S. (2011). Japanese lesson study: Teacher professional development through communities of inquiry. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 13(1), 77–93.Google Scholar
  4. Fernandez, C., Cannon, J., & Chokshi, S. (2003). A U.S.-Japan lesson study collaborative reveals critical lenses for examining practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 171–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fernandez, C. & Yoshida, M. (2004). Lesson study: a japanese approach to improving mathematics teaching and learning. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.Google Scholar
  6. Goldsmith, L. T., Doerr, H. M., & Lewis, C. C. (2014). Mathematics teachers’ learning: A conceptual framework and synthesis of research. Journal Mathematics Teacher Education, 17, 5–36. doi:10.1007/s10857-013-9245-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hart, L. C., & Carriere, J. (2011). Developing the habits of mind for a successful lesson study community. In L. C. Hart, A. Alston, & A. Murata (Eds.), Lesson study research and practice in mathematics education (pp. 27–38). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Isoda, M. (2007). Where did lesson study come begin, and how far has it come? In M. Isoda, M. Stephens, Y. Ohara, & T. Miyakawa (Eds.), Japanese lesson study in mathematics: Its impact, diversity and potential for educational improvement (pp. 8–15). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lewis, C. (2002). Does lesson study have a future in the United States? Nagoya Journal of Education and Human Development, 1, 1–23.Google Scholar
  10. Lewis, C., Perry, R., Friedkin, S., & Roth, J. (2012). Improving teaching does improve teachers: Evidence from lesson study. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(5), 368–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lewis, C., Perry, R., & Hurd, J. (2009). Improving mathematics instruction through lesson study: A theoretical model and North American case. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(4), 285–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lim, C. S., & Kor, L. K. (2012). ‘Excellent’ primary mathematics teachers’ espoused and enacted values of effective lessons. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 44(1), 59–70. doi:10.1007/s11858-012-0390-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lim, C. S., & Kor, L. K. (2015). Chapter 7: Video as a medium for introducing Lesson Study to multi-ethnic Malaysian mathematics teachers. In S. F. Ng (Ed.), Cases of mathematics professional development in East Asian Countries: Using video to support grounded analysis (Mathematics Teacher Education). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  14. Murata, A. (2011). Introduction: Conceptual overview of Lesson Study. In L. C. Hart, A. S. Alston, & A. Murata (Eds.), Lesson Study research and practice in mathematics education (pp. 1–12). London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. O’ Keefe, C., Xu, L. H., & Clarke, D. (2006). Kikan-Shido: Between desk instruction. In D. Clarke, J. Emanuelsson, E. Jablonka, & I. A. C. Mok (Eds.), Making connections: Comparing mathematics classrooms around the world. Dordrecht: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  16. Olson, J. C., White, P., & Sparrow, L. (2011). Influence of lesson study on teachers’ mathematics pedagogy. In L. C. Hart, A. S. Alston, & A. Murata (Eds.), Lesson Study research and practice in mathematics education (pp. 39–58). London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  18. Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (2009). Closing the teaching gap. Phi Delta Kappan, 91(3), 32–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Takahashi, A. (2011). Jumping into Lesson Study—In-service mathematics teacher education. In L. C. Hart, A. Alston, & A. Murata (Eds.), Lesson Study research and practice in mathematics education (pp. 79–82). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Takahashi, A., Watanabe, T., Yoshida, M., & Wang-Iverson, P. (2005). Improving content and pedagogical knowledge through kyozaikenkyu. In P. Wang-Iverson & M. Yoshida (Eds.), Building our understanding of lesson study. Philadelphia: Research for Better Schools.Google Scholar
  21. Walter, C., & Briggs, J. (2012). What professional development makes the most difference to teachers? Oxford University Press. http://www.education.ox.ac.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/WalterBriggs_2012_TeacherDevelopment_public_v2.pdf. Accessed 30 Jan 2015.
  22. Watanabe, T., Takahashi, A., & Yoshida, M. (2008). Kyozaikenkyu: A critical step for conducting effective lesson study and beyond. In F. Arbaugh & P. M. Taylor (Eds.), Inquiry into mathematics teacher education, association of mathematics teacher educators (AMTE) monograph series (Vol. 5). San Diego: AMTE.Google Scholar
  23. White, A., & Lim, C. S. (2008). Lesson study in Asia Pacific classrooms: Local responses to a global movement. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40, 915–925. doi:10.1007/s11858-008-0138-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Widjaja, W., Vale, C., Groves, S., & Doig, B. (2015). Teachers’ professional growth with engagement in lesson study. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education,. doi:10.1007/s10857-015-9341-8.Google Scholar
  25. Yoshida, M., Chokshi, S., & Fernandez, C. (2001). Sample study lesson plan format. Lesson Study Research Group. http://www.tc.columbia.ed/lessonstudy/tools.html. Accessed 3 July 2012.
  26. Yoshida, M. & Fernandez, C. (2002). Lesson Study; An introduction. (20 minutes video on CD-Rom). Order from: http://www.globaledresources.com.

Copyright information

© FIZ Karlsruhe 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universiti Sains MalaysiaPenangMalaysia
  2. 2.Universiti Teknologi MARAKedahMalaysia

Personalised recommendations