Improving mathematics instruction and supporting teacher learning in Korea through lesson study using five practices
- 828 Downloads
Given the effect of lesson study on improving the quality of mathematics instruction and supporting teachers’ professional development, this paper describes how a lesson study using five practices for mathematics discussion was implemented in the Korean context. This paper then analyzes how the lessons were changed through the lesson study cycle and what the participating teachers learned through lesson study. The results showed that the lessons were changed to specify learning goals for students, to devise mathematical tasks in a rigorous and meaningful way, and to design the lesson structure to maximize students’ engagement. The results also demonstrated that the lessons were enhanced by implementing the five practices. Whereas the anticipating practice was well-implemented from the beginning of the lesson study cycle, the connecting practice was fully established only in the final phase of the cycle. The participating teachers learned the importance of detailed lesson planning, realized the complexity of teaching practices, and developed a better understanding of how to utilize students’ ideas. Building on these results, it is expected that they will expand our understanding of lesson study and facilitate international dialogue regarding the professional development of in-service mathematics teachers.
KeywordsProfessional development Lesson study Teacher learning Five practices for mathematical discussion
The author would like to thank Dr. Minsung Kwon from the University of Michigan for her help in editing the manuscript. The author is also grateful to participating teachers for their enthusiasm and commitment to the lesson study. A subset of the findings from this study was reported at the 39th Annual Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.
- Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
- Fernandez, C., & Yoshida, M. (2004). Lesson study: A Japanese approach to improving mathematics teaching and learning. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory strategies for qualitative research. Piscataway: Transaction.Google Scholar
- Gyeonggi Provincial Office of Education. (2014). Operating plan of 2015 innovative sympathy schools. Gyeonggi: Gyeonggi Provincial Office of Education.Google Scholar
- Huang, R., Gong, Z., & Han, X. (2015). Implementing mathematics teaching that promote students’ understanding through theory-driven lesson study. ZDM Mathematics Education. doi: 10.1007/s11858-105-0743-y.
- Kim, S. (2015). Master teacher’s role in professional development and the mentor teacher system. In J. Kim, I. Han, M. Park, & J. Lee (Eds.), Mathematics education in Korea: Contemporary trends in researches in Korea (Vol. 2, pp. 57–75). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.Google Scholar
- Kim, B., & Choi, S. (2012). Lesson observation-analysis process. Poster presented at the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education.Google Scholar
- Lee, H. G. (2010). Criticism of culture revealed in excellent instruction. Paper presented at the 22nd Chungnam subject matter education policy forum.Google Scholar
- Lewis, C. C., & Hurd, J. (2011). Lesson study step by step: How teacher learning communities improve instruction. Portsmouth: Heinemann.Google Scholar
- Li, Y., Ma, Y., & Pang, J. S. (2008). Mathematical preparation of prospective elementary teachers: Practices in selected education systems in East Asia. In P. Sullivan & T. Wood (Eds.), The international handbook of mathematics teacher education: Knowledge and beliefs in mathematics teaching and teaching development (Vol. 1, pp. 37–62). Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
- Marton, F., & Tsui, A. B. (2004). Classroom discourse and the space of learning. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Ministry of Education. (2015). 2015 revised mathematics curriculum. Seoul: the Author.Google Scholar
- Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology. (2012). Mathematics 6-2. Seoul: Doosandonga.Google Scholar
- Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics. Chestnut Hill: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.Google Scholar
- Na, G. S. (2010). Reporting the activities of learning community on elementary mathematics lesson. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 20(3), 373–395.Google Scholar
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. Reston: NCTM.Google Scholar
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2010). PISA 2009 results: What students know and can do—student performance in reading, mathematics, and science (Vol. 1). Paris: Author.Google Scholar
- Smith, M. S., & Stein, M. K. (2011). 5 practices for orchestrating productive mathematics discussions. Reston: NCTM.Google Scholar
- Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar