Skip to main content
Log in

A focus on exploratory tasks in lesson study: The Canadian ‘Math for Young Children’ project

  • Original Article
  • Published:
ZDM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In an effort to increase our understanding of what mathematics young children are capable of when provided with playful yet purposeful opportunities to learn, Canadian researchers initiated lesson study over 4 years with teams of teachers of young children (ages 4–7). The lesson study process followed a lesson study cycle of goal setting, planning, implementation and reflection, with one major variation: a focus on the design and implementation of exploratory tasks. Exploratory tasks are brief, collaboratively planned activities that focus on precise mathematics content with engaging contexts. The lesson study team featured in this paper presented students with challenging exploratory tasks to investigate length, perimeter and area measurement concepts as they progressed toward the public research lesson. Through the process, lesson study teachers increased their abilities to look and listen for student mathematics thinking that affected their subsequent planning to tasks. Notably, teacher estimations of what young children can do were expanded and raised. Students also made significant gains on pre-post interviews, suggesting that exploratory tasks are a powerful variation of lesson study that increases teacher and student learning due to increases in frequency, emphasis and implementation of quality tasks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alston, A., Pedrick, L., Morris, K., & Basu, R. (2011). Lesson study as a tool for developing teachers’ close attention to students’ mathematical thinking. In L. Hart, A. Alston, & A. Murata (Eds.), Lesson study research and practice in mathematics education (pp. 135–152). New York: Springer Science + Business Media B.V.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Applebaum, M., & Leiken, R. (2014). Mathematical challenge in the eyes of the beholder: Mathematics teachers’ views. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 14(4), 388–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baroody, A., Lai, M., & Mix, K. (2006). The development of young children’s early number and operation sense and its implications for early childhood education. In B. Spodek & O. Saracho (Eds.), Handbook of research on the education of young children (2nd ed., pp. 187–221). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, C.D., Flynn, T., Ross, J., & Moss, J. (2011). In B. Ubuz (Ed.), Promoting teacher and student mathematics learning through lesson study: A design research approach. Proceedings of the thirty-fifth conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, vol. 2 (pp. 193–200). Ankara: PME.

  • Bruce, C. & Flynn, T. (2012). Integrating instruction and play in a Kindergarten to Grade 2 lesson study project. In L.R. Van Zoest, J.J. Lo, &  J.L. Kratky, (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Kalamazoo, MI: Western Michigan University.

  • Bruce, C. D., & Hawes, Z. (2014). The role of 2D and 3D mental rotation in mathematics for young children: What is it? Why does it matter? And what can we do about it? ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 47(3), 1–14. doi:10.1007/s11858-014-0637.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, C., & Ladky, M. (2011). What’s going on backstage? Revealing the work of lesson study. In L. Hart, A. Alston, & A. Murata (Eds.), Lesson study research and practice in mathematics education (pp. 243–249). New York: Springer Science + Business Media B.V.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, C., Moss, J., & Flynn, T. (2013). A “no-ceiling” approach to young children’s mathematics: Preliminary results of an innovative professional learning program. In M. Martinez & A. Castro Superfine (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (p. 911). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.

  • Charmaz, K. (2003). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist models. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claessens, A., Duncan, G., & Engel, M. (2009). Kindergarten skills and fifth-grade achievement: Evidence from the ECLS-K. Economics of Education Review, 28, 415–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clements, D., & Sarama, J. (2013). Rethinking early mathematics: What is research-based curriculum for young children? In L. English & J. Mulligan (Eds.), Reconceptualizing Early Mathematics Learning (pp. 128–147). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design Research: Theoretical and Methodological Issues. The Journal Of The Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, A. J. (2008). KeyMath-3 Canadian edition. Diagnostic assessment. Toronto: Pearson Canada Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copley, J. V. (2004). The early childhood collaborative: A professional development model to communicate and implement the standards. In D. H. Clements & J. Sarama (Eds.), Engaging young children in mathematics: Standards for early childhood mathematics education (pp. 401–414). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copley, J.V., Glass, K., Nix, L., Faseler, A., De Jesus, M., & Tanksley, S. (2004). Measuring experiences for young children. Teaching Children Mathematics, February, 316–320.

  • Doig, B., Groves, S., & Fujii, T. (2011). The critical role of task development in lesson study. In L. Hart, A. Alston, & A. Murata (Eds.), Lesson study research and practice in mathematics education (pp. 181–197). New York: Springer Science + Business Media B.V.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, G. J., Dowsett, C. J., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K., Huston, A. C., Klebanov, P., & Japel, C. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1428–1446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erikson Institute—The Early Math Collaborative. (2014). The big ideas of early mathematics: What teachers of young children need to know. New Jersey: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franke, M., Webb, N., Chan, A., Ing, M., Freund, D., & Battey, D. (2009). Teacher questioning to elicit students’ mathematical thinking in elementary school classrooms. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(4), 380–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, H. P. (2006). Mathematical play and playful mathematics: A guide for early education. In D. Singer, R. M. Golinkoff, & K. Hirsh-Pasek (Eds.), Play = Learning: How play motivates and enhances children’s cognitive and social-emotional growth (pp. 145–165). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, H. P. (2009). The challenge of formative assessment in mathematics education: Children’s minds, teachers’ minds. Human Development, 52, 109–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, H. P., Lee, J. S., & Boyd, J. S. (2008). Math education for young children: what it is and how to promote it. Social policy report: Giving child and youth development knowledge away, 22(1), 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, L., Alston, A., & Murata, A. (Eds.). (2011). Lesson study research and practice in mathematics education. New York: Springer Science + Business Media B.V.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunting, R., & Pearn, C. (2009). Mathematical thinking of young children through the eyes of pre-school practitioners. In R. Hunter, B. Bicknell, & T. Burgess (Eds.), Crossing divides: Mathematics education research group of Australasia: Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 654–657). Wellington: MERGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, N., & Levine, S. (2009). Socioeconomic variation, number competence, and mathematics learning difficulties in young children. Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 15, 60–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. S., & Ginsburg, H. P. (2009). Early childhood teachers’ misconceptions about mathematics education for young children in the United States. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 34(4), 37–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leikin, R. (2007). Habits of mind associated with advanced mathematical thinking and solution spaces of mathematical tasks. In D. Pitta-Pantazi & G. Philippou (Eds.), The proceedings of the Fifth Conference of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education—CERME-5 (pp. 2330–2339). Larnaca: University of Cyprus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leikin, R. (2014). Challenging mathematics with multiple solution tasks and mathematical investigations in geometry. In Y. Li, E. A. Silver, & S. Li (Eds.), Transforming mathematics instruction: Multiple approaches and practices (pp. 59–80). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, C. (2011). Seeing the whole iceberg—The critical role of tasks, inquiry stance, and teacher learning in lesson study. In L. Hart, A. Alston, & A. Murata (Eds.), Lesson study research and practice in mathematics education (pp. 235–240). New York: Springer Science + Business Media B.V.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, C., Perry, R., Friedkin, S., & Roth, J. (2012). Improving teaching does improve teachers: Evidence from lesson study. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(5), 368–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, C., Perry, R., & Hurd, J. (2009). Improving mathematics instruction through lesson study: a theoretical model and North American case. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(4), 285–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, C., Perry, R., & Murata, A. (2006). How should research contribute to instructional improvement: The case of lesson study. Educational Researcher, 35(3), 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maher, C. A., & Sigley, R. (2014). Task-based interviews in mathematics education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education (pp. 579–582). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mast, J., & Ginsburg, H. (2010). Child study/lesson study: Developing minds to understand & teach children. In N. Lyons (Ed.), Handbook of reflection and reflective inquiry: Mapping a way of knowing for professional reflective inquiry (pp. 257–271). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Moss, J., Bruce, C., & Bobis, J. (2015). Young children’s access to powerful mathematics ideas: A review of current challenges and new developments in the early years. In English & Kirshner (Ed.), Invited chapter for International Handbook on Mathematics Education (in press).

  • Moss, J., Hawes, Z., Naqvi, S., & Caswell, B. (2015b). Adapting Japanese Lesson Study to enhance to teaching and learning of geometry and spatial reasoning in early years classrooms: a case study. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47, 377–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murata, A. (2011). Introduction: Conceptual overview of lesson study. In L. Hart, A. Alston, & A. Murata (Eds.), Lesson study research and practice in mathematics education (pp. 1–12). New York: Springer Science + Business Media B.V.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Newcombe, N. S., & Frick, A. (2010). Early education for spatial intelligence: Why, what, and how. Mind, Brain, and Education, 4(3), 102–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, J., White, P., & Sparrow, L. (2011). Influence of lesson study on teachers’ mathematics pedagogy. In L. Hart, A. Alston, & A. Murata (Eds.), Lesson study research and practice in mathematics education (pp. 39–57). New York: Springer Science + Business Media B.V.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, B., & Dockett, S. (2008). Young children’s access to powerful mathematical ideas. In L. D. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (2nd ed., pp. 75–108). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, S. (2004). Discourse in activity and activity in discourse. In R. Rogers (Ed.), An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education (pp. 79–96). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarama, J., & Clements, D. (2008). Mathematics in early childhood. In O. Saracho & B. Spodek (Eds.), Contemporary Perspectives on Mathematics in Early Childhood Education (pp. 67–94). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seo, K., & Ginsburg, H. (2004). What is developmentally appropriate in early childhood mathematics education? Lessons from new research. In D. Clements, J. Sarama, & A. Dibiase (Eds.), Engaging young children in mathematics: Standards for early childhood mathematics education (pp. 91–104). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: Summit Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stylianides, A. J., & Stylianides, G. J. (2013). Seeking research-grounded solutions to problems of practice: Classroom-based interventions in mathematics education. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(3), 333–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tepylo, D., & Moss, J. (2011). Examining change in teacher mathematical knowledge through lesson study. In L. Hart, A. Alston, & A. Murata (Eds.), Lesson study research and practice in mathematics education (pp. 59–77). New York: Springer Science + Business Media B.V.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Akker, J., Gravemeijer, K., McKenney, S., & Nieveen, N. (Eds.). (2006). Educational design research. Routledge.

  • Watts, T., Duncan, G., Seigler, R., & Davis-Kean, P. (2014). What’s past is prologue: relations between early mathematics knowledge and high school achievement. Educational Researcher, 43(7), 352–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, T. (1998). Funneling or focusing? Alternative patterns of communication in mathematics class. In H. Steinbring, M.G. Bartolini-Bussi, & A. Sierpinska (Eds.), Language and communication in the mathematics classroom (pp. 167–178). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

  • Wright, R. 1. (1994). A study of the numerical development of 5-year-olds and 6-year-olds. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26, 25–44.

  • Yoshida, M., & Jackson, W. (2011). Ideas for developing mathematical pedagogical content knowledge through lesson study. In L. Hart, A. Alston, & A. Murata (Eds.), Lesson study research and practice in mathematics education (pp. 279–288). New York: Springer Science + Business Media B.V.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is made possible thanks to federal research funding of the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council and through provincial funding of the Ontario Ministry of Education.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine D. Bruce.

Appendix

Appendix

Sample from coding manual for qualitative analysis of field notes and transcripts (Umbrella Code “Knowledge of Students”) (Table 7).

Table 7 Code 3: Evidence of Knowledge of Students (observations made about individual and small groups of children that were expressed during meetings and interviews)—note that double coding was permitted

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bruce, C.D., Flynn, T.C. & Bennett, S. A focus on exploratory tasks in lesson study: The Canadian ‘Math for Young Children’ project. ZDM Mathematics Education 48, 541–554 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0747-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0747-7

Keywords

Navigation