ZDM

, Volume 48, Issue 4, pp 425–439 | Cite as

Implementing mathematics teaching that promotes students’ understanding through theory-driven lesson study

Original Article

Abstract

Lesson study (LS) has been practiced in China as an effective way to advance teachers’ professional development for decades. This study explores how LS improves teaching that promotes students’ understanding. A LS group including didacticians (practice-based teaching research specialist and University-based mathematics educators) and mathematics teachers in China explored and documented how teacher participants shifted their attention to students’ learning by incorporating two notions of teaching: learning trajectory (LT) and variation pedagogy (VP). The former describes conjectured routes of children’s thinking and learning with pertinent tasks to move towards the learning goals along the route, while the latter suggests strategies for using systematic tasks progressively. The concepts of LT and VP are used to guide planning, teaching, and debriefing throughout the LS process. Data consist of lesson plans, videotaped lessons, post-lesson discussions, post-lesson quizzes, and teachers’ reflection reports. This study reveals that by building on the learning trajectory and by strategically using variation tasks, the lesson has been improved in terms of students’ understanding, proficiency, and mathematical reasoning. In addition, the LT was refined through the LS. This study displays how theory-driven LS could help teachers improve their teaching and develop the linkage between theory and practice.

Keywords

Lesson study Learning trajectory Variation pedagogy Theory-driven lesson study 

References

  1. Cai, J., & Wang, T. (2006). U.S. and Chinese teachers’ conception and construction of representations: a case of teaching ratio concept. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4, 145–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cai, J., & Wang, T. (2010). Conception of effective mathematic teaching with a cultural context: perspectives of teachers from China and the United States. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13, 265–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carpenter, T. C., Lindquist, M. M., Brown, C. A., Kouba, V. L., Silver, E. A., & Swafford, J. O. (1988). Results of the fourth NAEP assessment of mathematics: trends and conclusions. Arithmetic Teacher, 36(4), 38–41.Google Scholar
  4. Chen, X., & Yang, F. (2013). Chinese teachers’ reconstruction of the curriculum reform through lesson study. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 2, 218–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2004). Learning trajectories in mathematics education. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(2), 81–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clements, D., Sarama, J., Spitler, M., Lange, A., & Wolfe, C. B. (2011). Mathematics learned by young children in an intervention based on learning trajectories: a large-scale cluster randomized trial. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42, 127–166.Google Scholar
  7. Common Core State Standards Initiative (CCSSI) (2010). Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. http://www.corestandards.org/Math/Practice.
  8. Gu, L., Huang, R., & Marton, F. (2004). Teaching with variation: an effective way of mathematics teaching in China. In L. Fan, N. Y. Wong, J. Cai, & S. Li (Eds.), How Chinese learn mathematics: perspectives from insiders (pp. 309–348). Singapore: World Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hart, L. C., Alston, A. S., & Murata, A. (2011). Lesson study research and practice in mathematics education: learning together. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Huang, R., & Bao, J. (2006). Towards a model for teacher’s professional development in China: introducing keli. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 279–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Huang, R., & Cai, J. (2011). Pedagogical representations to teach linear relations in Chinese and U.S. classrooms: parallel or hierarchical? The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 30(2), 149–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Huang, R., & Han, X. (2015). Developing mathematics teachers’ competence through parallel lesson study. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 4(2), 100–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huang, R., Su, H., & Xu, S. (2014). Developing teachers’ and teaching researchers’ professional competence in mathematics through Chinese Lesson Study. ZDMThe International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46, 239–251.Google Scholar
  14. Kieran, C., Krainer, K., & Shaughnessy, J. M. (2013). Linking research to practice: teachers as key stakeholders in mathematics education research. In M. A. Clements, A. J. Bishop, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), Third international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 361–392). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  15. Langley, G. J., Moen, R. D., Nolan, K. M., Nolan, T. W., Norman, C. L., & Provost, L. P. (2009). The improvement guide. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  16. Lee, C. K. E., & Lo, M. L. (2013). The role of lesson study in facilitating curriculum reform. International Journal For Lesson And Learning Studies, 2, 200–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lewis, C. C. (2015). What is improvement sciences? Do we need it in education? Educational Researcher, 44(1), 54–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lewis, C. C., Perry, R., & Murata, A. (2006). How should research contribute to instructional improvement? The case of lesson study. Educational Researcher, 35(3), 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Li, Y. (2008). What do students need to learn about division of fractions? Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 13, 546–552.Google Scholar
  20. Lo, M. L., & Marton, F. (2012). Toward a science of the art of teaching: using variation theory as a guiding principle of pedagogical design. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 1, 7–22.Google Scholar
  21. Maloney, A. P., Confrey, J., & Nguyen, K. H. (2014). Learning over time: learning trajectories in mathematics. Charlotte: Informational age publishing.Google Scholar
  22. Marton, F., & Tsui, A. B. M. (with Chik, P. P. M., Ko, P. Y., Lo, M. L., Mok, I. A. C., Ng, F. P., Pang, M.F., et al.) (Eds.). (2004). Classroom discourse and the space of learning. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  23. Marton, F., & Pang, M. F. (2006). On some necessary conditions of learning. The Journal of the Learning Science, 15, 193–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ministry of Education, P. R. China. (2011). Mathematics curriculum standards for compulsory education (grades 1–9). Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Murata, A. (2011). Introduction: conceptual overview of lesson study. In C. L., Hart, A. S., Alston, & A. Murata (Eds.), Lesson study research and practice in mathematics education: learning together (pp. 1–12). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  26. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to action: ensuring mathematical success for all. Reston: NCTM.Google Scholar
  27. Ott, J. M., Snook, D. L., & Gibson, D. L. (1991). Understanding partitive division of fractions. The Arithmetic Teacher, 39, 7–11.Google Scholar
  28. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  29. Silvia, E. M. (1983). A look at division with fractions. The Arithmetic Teacher, 30, 38–41.Google Scholar
  30. Simon, M. A. (1995). Prospective elementary teachers’ knowledge of division. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24, 233–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sowder, J., Sowder, L., & Nickerson, S. (2010). Reconceptualizing mathematics for elementary school teachers. New York: W.H. Freeman & Company.Google Scholar
  32. Stein, M., Engle, R., Smith, M., & Hughes, E. (2008). Orchestrating productive mathematical discussions: five practices for helping teachers move beyond show and tell. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10, 313–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stein, M. K., & Lane, S. (1996). Instructional tasks and the development of student capacity to think and reason: an analysis of the relationship between teaching and learning in a reform mathematics project. Educational Research and Evaluation, 2, 50–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sztajn, P., Confrey, J., Wilson, P. H., & Edgington, C. (2012). Learning trajectory based instruction: toward a theory of teaching. Educational Researcher, 41, 147–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tirosh, D. (2000). Enhancing prospective teachers’ knowledge of children’s conceptions: the case of division of fractions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31, 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Watson, A., & Mason, J. (2006). Seeing an exercise as a single mathematical object: using variation to structure sense-making. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 8(2), 91–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Woodbury, S., & Gess-Newsome, J. (2002). Overcoming the paradox of change without difference: a model of change in the arena of fundamental school reform. Educational Policy, 16, 763–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yang, Y., & Ricks, T. E. (2013). Chinese lesson study: developing classroom instruction through collaborations in school-based teaching research group activities. In Y. Li & R. Huang (Eds.), How Chinese teach mathematics and improve teaching (pp. 51–65). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© FIZ Karlsruhe 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Middle Tennessee State UniversityMurfreesboroUSA
  2. 2.Hangzhou Normal UniversityHangzhouChina
  3. 3.Dominican UniversityRiver ForestUSA

Personalised recommendations