The act and artifact of drawing(s): observing geometric thinking with, in, and through children’s drawings Original Article First Online: 27 May 2015 Accepted: 12 May 2015 DOI :
10.1007/s11858-015-0697-0

Cite this article as: Thom, J.S. & McGarvey, L.M. ZDM Mathematics Education (2015) 47: 465. doi:10.1007/s11858-015-0697-0 Abstract In mathematics education, as in other domains, drawing serves as means to access, assess, and attend to children’s understanding. While theoretical accounts of drawings are often based on developmental stage theories, we examine insights gained by considering children’s geometric thinking and reasoning from embodied cognitive perspectives. We ask, what if the act of drawing serves as a means by which children become aware of geometric concepts and relationships, rather than being viewed as a product of that awareness? In this paper, we examine three vignettes and inquire into the ways that children come to draw in geometric contexts. We suggest that the children’s choice to draw as a mode of thinking, the different ways they draw, the manners in which they attend to the mathematics as they draw, and the conceptions that arise with their drawings, contribute in significant ways to their geometric understanding.

References Arcavi, A. (2003). The role of visual representations in the learning of mathematics.

Educational Studies in Mathematics,
52 (3), 215–241.

CrossRef Google Scholar Bartolini Bussi, M. G. (2007). Semiotic mediation: fragments from a classroom experiment on the coordination of spatial perspectives.

ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education,
39 (1–2), 63–71.

CrossRef Google Scholar Burger, W. F., & Shaughnessy, J. M. (1986). Characterizing the van Hiele levels of development in geometry.

Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,
17 (1), 31–48.

CrossRef Google Scholar Cain, P. (2010).

Drawing: the enactive evolution of the practitioner . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Google Scholar Carlsen, M. (2009). Reasoning with paper and pencil: the role of inscriptions in student learning of geometric series.

Mathematics Education Research Journal,
21 (1), 54–84.

CrossRef Google Scholar Carruthers, E., & Worthington, M. (2006).

Children’s mathematics: making marks, making meaning (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.

Google Scholar Châtelet, G. (2000/1993). Les enjeux du mobile . Paris: Seuil. [English translation by R. Shore and M. Zagha: Figuring space: philosophy, mathematics and physics . Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2000].

Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2009).

Learning and teaching early math: the learning trajectories approach . New York: Routledge.

Google Scholar Crespo, S. M., & Kyriakides, A. O. (2007). To draw or not to draw: exploring children’s drawings for solving mathematics problems.

Teaching Children Mathematics,
14 (2), 118–125.

Google Scholar Darling Kelly, D. (2004).

Uncovering the history of children’s drawing and art . Westport: Praeger Publishers.

Google Scholar David, M. M., & Tomaz, V. S. (2012). The role of visual representations for structuring classroom mathematical activity.

Educational Studies in Mathematics,
80 (3), 413–431.

CrossRef Google Scholar Davis, G., & Hyun, E. (2005). A study of kindergarten children's spatial representation in a mapping project.

Mathematics Education Research Journal,
17 (1), 73–100.

CrossRef Google Scholar de Freitas, E., & Sinclair, N. (2012). Diagram, gesture, agency: theorizing embodiment in the mathematics classroom.

Educational Studies in Mathematics,
80 (1–2), 133–152.

Google Scholar Department for Children, Schools and Families [DCSF]. (2008).

Mark making matters: Young children making meaning in all areas of learning and development . Nottingham: DCSF.

Google Scholar Depraz, N., Varela, F. J., & Vermersch, P. (Eds.). (2003).

On becoming aware: a pragmatics of experiencing . Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.

Google Scholar Diezmann, C. M., & English, L. D. (2001). Promoting the use of diagrams as tools for thinking. In A. A. Cuoco & F. R. Curcio (Eds.),

The roles of representation in school mathematics. 2001 NCTM yearbook. (pp. 77–89). Reston: NCTM.

Google Scholar Diezmann, C. M., & McCosker, N. T. (2011). Reading students’ representations.

Teaching Children Mathematics,
18 (3), 162–169.

Google Scholar Duval, R. (1999). Representation, vision and visualization: cognitive functions in mathematical thinking. Basic issues for learning. In F. Hitt and M. Santos (Eds.). Proceedings of the 21st North American PME conference (pp. 3–26). Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.

Duval, R. (2014). Commentary: linking epistemology and semio-cognitive modeling in visualization.

ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education,
46 (1), 159–170.

CrossRef Google Scholar Edens, K., & Potter, E. (2008). How students “unpack” the structure of a word problem: graphic representations and problem solving.

School Science and Mathematics,
108 (5), 184–196.

CrossRef Google Scholar Edwards, L. D. (2009). Gesture and conceptual integration in mathematical talk.

Educational Studies in Mathematics,
70 (2), 127–141.

CrossRef Google Scholar Goldin, G. A. (2002). Representation in mathematical learning and problem solving. In L. D. English (Ed.),

Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 197–218). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Google Scholar Grafton, S. T., & Hamilton, A. F. (2007). Evidence for a distributed hierarchy of action representation in the brain.

Human Movement Science,
26 (4), 590–616.

CrossRef Google Scholar Holt, L. E., & Beilock, S. L. (2006). Expertise and its embodiment: examining the impact of sensorimotor skill expertise on the representation of action-related text.

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review,
13 (4), 694–701.

CrossRef Google Scholar Hostetter, A. B., & Alibali, M. W. (2008). Visible embodiment: gestures as simulated action.

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review,
15 (3), 495–514.

CrossRef Google Scholar Inan, H. Z., & Dogan-Temur, O. (2010). Understanding kindergarten teachers’ perspectives of teaching basic geometric shapes: a phenomenographic research.

ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education,
42 , 457–468.

CrossRef Google Scholar Kaput, J. J. (1998). Representations, inscriptions, descriptions and learning: a kaleidoscope of windows.

Journal of Mathematical Behavior,
17 (2), 265–281.

CrossRef Google Scholar Lakoff, G., & Núñez, R. E. (2000).

Where mathematics comes from: how the embodied mind brings mathematics into being . New York: Basic Books.

Google Scholar MacDonald, A. (2013). Using children’s representations to investigate meaning-making in mathematics.

Australasian Journal of Early Childhood,
38 (2), 65–73.

Google Scholar Malchiodi, C. A. (1998).

Understanding children’s drawings . New York: Guilford Press.

Google Scholar Maturana, H., & Varela, F. (1992).

The tree of knowledge: the biological roots of human understanding (Revised edition) . Boston: Shambhala.

Google Scholar Mulligan, J. T., & Mitchelmore, M. C. (2009). Awareness of pattern and structure in early mathematical development.

Mathematics Education Research Journal,
21 (2), 33–49.

CrossRef Google Scholar National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2006).

Curriculum focal points for prekindergarten through Grade 8 mathematics . Reston: NCTM.

Google Scholar National Film Board of Canada (NFB). (1969).

Notes on a triangle [Film] . Montreal: The Board.

Google Scholar National Research Council. (2009). Mathematics learning in early childhood: paths toward excellence and equity. In Committee on early childhood mathematics, Christopher, T., Cross, Taniesha, A., Woods, and Heidi Schweingruber. (Eds.). Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education . Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Nemirovsky, R., & Ferrara, F. (2009). Mathematical imagination and embodied cognition.

Educational Studies in Mathematics,
70 (2), 159–174.

CrossRef Google Scholar Nunokawa, K. (2006). Using drawings and generating information in mathematical problem solving processes.

Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education,
2 (3), 33–54.

Google Scholar Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1967).

The child’s conception of space . London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Google Scholar Ping, R., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2010). Gesturing saves cognitive resources when talking about nonpresent objects.

Cognitive Science,
34 (4), 602–619.

CrossRef Google Scholar Presmeg, N. (2006). Research on visualization in learning and teaching mathematics: Emergence from psychology. In A. Gutierrez & P. Boero (Eds.),

Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education: past, present, and future (pp. 205–236). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

Google Scholar Rivera, F. D. (2014). From math drawings to algorithms: emergence of whole number operations in children.

ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education,
46 (1), 59–77.

CrossRef Google Scholar Rivera, F., Steinbring, H., & Arcavi, A. (Eds.) (2014). Visualization as an epistemological tool. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education , 46 (1), 1–2.

Sarama, J., & Clements, D. H. (2009).

Early childhood mathematics education research: Learning trajectories for young children . New York: Routledge.

Google Scholar Schneckloth, S. (2008). Marking time, figuring space: gesture and the embodied moment.

Journal of Visual Culture,
7 (3), 277–292.

CrossRef Google Scholar Sinclair, N., & Gol Tabaghi, S. (2010). Drawing space: mathematicians’ kinetic conceptions of eigenvectors.

Educational Studies in Mathematics,
74 (3), 223–240.

CrossRef Google Scholar Thom, J. S. (2011). Nurturing mathematical reasoning.

Teaching Children Mathematics,
18 (4), 234–243.

Google Scholar Thom, J. S., & Roth, W. M. (2011). Radical embodiment and semiotics: toward a theory of mathematics in the flesh.

Educational Studies in Mathematics,
77 (2–3), 267–284.

CrossRef Google Scholar Thom, J., Roth, W. M., & Bautista, A. (2010). In the flesh: living, growing conceptual domains in a geometry lesson.

Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education,
7 , 77–87.

Google Scholar Thompson, E. (2010).

Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind . Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Google Scholar Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991).

The embodied mind: cognitive science and human experience . Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Google Scholar Wheatley, G. H. (2007).

Quick draw (2nd ed.). Bethany Beach: Mathematics Learning.

Google Scholar Woleck, K.R. (2001). Listen to their pictures. An investigation of children’s mathematical drawings. In A.A. Cuoco and F.R. Curcio (Eds), The roles of representation in school mathematics. 2001 NCTM yearbook. (pp. 215–227). Reston: NCTM.

Woodward, M. (2012).

A monstrous rhinoceros (as from life): toward (and beyond) the epistemological nature of the enacted pictorial image . Plymouth: Transtechnology Research.

Google Scholar Zahner, D., & Corter, J. E. (2010). The process of probability problem solving: use of external visual representations.

Mathematical Thinking and Learning,
12 (2), 177–204.

CrossRef Google Scholar Authors and Affiliations 1. University of Victoria Victoria Canada 2. University of Alberta Edmonton Canada