Children’s understanding of large-scale mapping tasks: an analysis of talk, drawings, and gesture
- 491 Downloads
This research examined how children represent motion in large-scale mapping tasks that we referred to as “motion maps”. The underlying mathematical content was transformational geometry. In total, 19 children, 8- to 10-year-old, created motion maps and captured their motion maps with accompanying verbal description digitally. Analysis of the responses included a fine-grained coding of their drawing, oral description, and hand gestures used while describing. In addition, the classroom teacher (second author) also assessed the drawings and the oral responses. Results indicate that low achieving children produced fewer objects in their drawings, fewer gestures, and fewer verbal descriptions when engaging in a large-scale mapping task compared to high achieving children. Moreover, these children were found to use a series of connected small-scale maps to construct the larger-scale representation.
KeywordsChildren Drawing Dynamic Gesture Map Spatial Static Transformational geometry Verbal
We would like to thank the school participants and Ms. Laaraib Khattak, our research assistant.
- Butterworth, G. (2003). Pointing is the royal road to language in babies. In S. Kita (Ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture, and cognition meet (pp. 85–107). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Clements, D. H. (2004). Geometric and spatial thinking in early childhood education. In D. H. Clements, J. Sarama, & A.-M. Di Biase (Eds.), Engaging young children in mathematics: Standards for early childhood mathematics education (pp. 267–298). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates Inc.Google Scholar
- Izard, V., & Spelke, E. S. (2009). Development of sensitivity to geometry in visual forms. Human Evolution, 23(3), 213–248.Google Scholar
- Möhring, W., Newcombe, N.S., & Frick, A. (2014). Zooming in on spatial scaling: Preschool children and adults use mental transformations to scale spaces. Developmental Psychology, 50(5), 1614–1619.Google Scholar
- Ontario Ministry of Education. (2010). Growing success: Assessment, evaluation, and reporting in Ontario schools. First edition, covering grades 1 to 12. Toronto: Queen’s Printer for Ontario.Google Scholar
- Ontario Ministry of Education and Training/OMET. (2005). The Ontario curriculum grades 1–8 mathematics, revised. Toronto: Queen’s Printer for Ontario.Google Scholar
- Smith, T., & MacDonald, A. (2009). Time for talk: The drawing-telling process. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 14(3), 21–26.Google Scholar
- Uttal, D. H. (2000). Seeing the big picture: Map use and the development of spatial cognition. Developmental Science, 3(3), 286–747.Google Scholar
- Woleck, K. R. (2001). Listen to their pictures: An investigation of children’s mathematical drawings. In A. A. Cuoco & F. R. Curcio (Eds.), The roles of representation in school mathematics (pp. 215–227). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar