Anghileri, J. (2006). Scaffolding practices that enhance mathematics learning. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education,
(1), 33–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arcavi, A. (2003). The role of visual representations in the learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics,
(3), 215–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battista, M. (2003). Understanding students’ thinking about area and volume measurement. In D. H. Clements & G. Bright (Eds.), Learning and teaching measurement (pp. 122–142). Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Berry, J. S., & Nyman, M. A. (2003). Promoting students’ graphical understanding of the calculus. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior,
(4), 479–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryant, P. (2008). Paper 5: understanding spaces and its representation in mathematics. In Nunez, T., Bryant, P. & Watson, A. (Eds.), Key understanding in mathematics learning: a report to the Nuffield Foundation.
Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research,
(1), 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, D. K., & Ball, D. L. (1999). Instruction, capacity, and improvement. CPRE research report series RR-43. Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania.
Coulson, S., & Oakley, T. (2005). Blending and coded meaning: literal and figurative meaning in cognitive semantics. Journal of Pragmatics,
(10), 1510–1536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuoco, A.A., & Goldenberg, E.P. (1997). Dynamic geometry as a bridge from Euclidean geometry to analysis. In King, J., &Schattschneider, D. (Eds.), Geometry turned on: dynamic software in learning, teaching, and research (No. 41). (pp. 33–44). Providence: The Mathematical Association of America (MAA).
Dorko, A., & Speer, N. (2014). Calculus students’ understanding of volume. In Proceedings of the 17th annual conference on research in undergraduate mathematics education.
Fauconnier, G. (1997). Mappings in thought and language
. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grootenboer, P. (2009). Rich mathematical tasks in the maths in the Kimberley (MITK) Project. In R. Hunter, B. Bicknell, & T. Burgess (Eds.), Crossing divides: proceedings of the 32nd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia
(Vol. 1). Palmerston North: MERGA.Google Scholar
Herbert, S., & Pierce, R. (2008). An ‘emergent model’ for rate of change. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning,
(3), 231–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackiw, N. (1991). The geometer’s sketchpad computer software
. Emeryville: Key Curriculum Press.Google Scholar
Koedinger, K. R. (1992). Emergent properties and structural constraints: Advantages of diagrammatic representations for reasoning and learning
. Palo Alto: Paper presented at the AAAI spring symposium series: reasoning with diagrammatic reasoning.Google Scholar
Martin, T. (2000). Calculus students’ ability to solve geometric related-rates problems. Mathematics Education Research Journal,
(2), 74–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, J., & Pimm, D. (1984). Generic examples: seeing the general in the particular. Educational Studies in Mathematics,
(3), 277–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreno-Armella, L. (2014). An essential tension in mathematics education. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46(4), 621–633.
Moss, J., Hawes, Z., Naqvi, S., & Caswell, B. (2015). Adapting Japanese Lesson Study to enhance the teaching and learning of geometry and spatial reasoning in early years classrooms: a case study. ZDM–The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 47(3) (this issue).
National Research Council. (2006). Learning to think spatially: GIS as a support system in the K-12 curriculum
. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Natsheh, I., &Karsenty, R. (2014). Exploring the potential role of visual reasoning tasks among inexperienced solvers. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46(1), 109–122.
Newcombe, N. S. (2006). A plea for spatial literacy. The Chronicle of Higher Education,
(26), B20.Google Scholar
Newcombe, N. S. (2010). Picture this: increasing math and science learning by improving spatial thinking. American Educator, 34(2), 29–35 (43).
Ontario Association for Mathematics Education. (2005). Growing up mathematically (GUM) (online version). http://www.oame.on.ca/main/index1.php?lang=en&code=gum
. Accessed 26 January 2011.
Presmeg, N. C. (2006). Research on visualization in learning and teaching mathematics. In A. Gutiérrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education
(pp. 205–235). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
Presmeg, N.C. (2014). Contemplating visualization as an epistemological learning tool in mathematics. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46(1), 151–157.
Silver, E. A. (1997). Fostering creativity through instruction rich in mathematical problem solving and problem posing. ZDM–The International Journal on Mathematics Education,
(3), 75–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, M. A. (2006). Key developmental understandings in mathematics: a direction for investigating and establishing learning goals. Mathematical Thinking and Learning,
(4), 359–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, N., & Bruce, C. (2015). New opportunities in geometry education at the primary school. ZDM–The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 47(3) (this issue).
Sinclair, N., de Freitas, E., & Ferrara, F. (2013). Virtual encounters: the murky and furtive world of mathematical inventiveness. ZDM––The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(2), 239–252.
Sinclair, M., Mamolo, A., & Whiteley, W. J. (2011). Designing spatial visual tasks for research: the case of the filling task. Educational Studies in Mathematics,
(2), 135–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skemp, R. R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching,
, 20–26.Google Scholar
Stein, M. K., & Lane, S. (1996). Instructional tasks and the development of student capacity to think and reason: an analysis of the relationship between teaching and learning in a reform mathematics project. Educational Research and Evaluation,
(1), 50–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strong, R., Thomas, E., Perini, M., & Silver, H. (2004). Creating a differentiated mathematics classroom. Educational Leadership, 73–78.
Sullivan, P., Clarke, D., & Clarke, B. (2013). Teaching with tasks for effective mathematics learning
. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tall, D. O. (2007). Developing a theory of mathematical growth. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education,
(1–2), 145–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tchoshanov, M., Blake, S., & Duval, A. (2002). Preparing teachers for a new challenge: teaching Calculus concepts in middle grades. In Proceedings of the second international conference on the teaching of mathematics (at the undergraduate level), Hersonissos, Crete.
Tomlinson, C. (1999). The differentiated classroom: responding to the needs of all learners
. Alexandria: ASCD.Google Scholar
Turner, M., & Fauconnier, G. (2002). The way we think: conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities
. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Uttal, D. H., Meadow, N. G., Tipton, E., Hand, L. L., Alden, A. R., Warren, C., & Newcombe, N. S. (2013). The malleability of spatial skills: a meta-analysis of training studies. Psychological Bulletin,
(2), 352–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasilyeva, M., Ganley, C. M., Casey, B. M., Dulaney, A., Tillinger, M., & Anderson, K. (2013). How children determine the size of 3D structures: investigating factors influencing strategy choice. Cognition and Instruction,
(1), 29–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weigand, H. G. (2014). A discrete approach to the concept of derivative. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46(4), 603–619.
Whiteley, W. (2007a). Visual reasoning: rates of change without derivatives
. Barrie: OAME Conference Georgian College.Google Scholar
Whiteley, W. (2007b). Rates of change without derivatives. Training camp for the new Ontario curriculum.
Whiteley, W. (2012). Mathematical modeling as conceptual blending: exploring an example within mathematics education. In Bockaravo, M., Danesi, M., &Núñez, R. (Eds.), Cognitive science and interdisciplinary approaches to mathematical cognition.
Whiteley, W., & Mamolo, A. (2011). The Popcorn box activity and reasoning about optimization. Mathematics Teacher,
(6), 420–426.Google Scholar
Whiteley, W., & Mamolo, A. (2013). Optimizing through geometric reasoning supported by 3-D models: Visual representations of change. In C. Margolinas (Ed.), Task design in mathematics education
(pp. 129–140). Oxford: Proceedings of the ICMI 22 conference.Google Scholar
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100.