The role of 2D and 3D mental rotation in mathematics for young children: what is it? Why does it matter? And what can we do about it?
- First Online:
- 1.4k Downloads
The ability to mentally rotate objects in space has been singled out by cognitive scientists as a central metric of spatial reasoning (see Jansen, Schmelter, Quaiser-Pohl, Neuburger, & Heil, 2013; Shepard & Metzler, 1971 for example). However, this is a particularly undeveloped area of current mathematics curricula, especially in North America. In this article we discuss what we mean by mental rotation, why it is important, and how it can be developed with young children in classrooms. We feature results from one team of teacher-researchers in Canada engaged in Lesson Study to develop enhanced theoretical understandings as well as practical applications in a geometry program that incorporates 2D and 3D mental rotations. Children in the Lesson Study classrooms (ages 4–8 years) demonstrated large gains in their mental rotation skills during 4 months of Lesson Study intervention in the Math for Young Children research program. The results of this study suggest that young children from a wide range of ability levels can engage in, and benefit from, classroom-based mental rotation activities. The study contributes to bridging a gap between cognitive science and mathematics education literature.
KeywordsSpatial reasoning Mental rotation Mathematics Young children Geometry
- Bauer, B., & Jolicoeur, P. (1996). Stimulus dimensionality effects in mental rotation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Performance and Perception, 22(1), 82–94.Google Scholar
- Bruce, C. & Flynn, T. (2012). Integrating instruction and play in a Kindergarten to Grade 2 lesson study project. In L.R. Van Zoest, J.J. Lo, & J.L. Kratky, (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Kalamazoo: Western Michigan University.Google Scholar
- Bruce, C., Flynn, T. & Moss, J. (2013). A “no-ceiling” approach to young children’s mathematics: preliminary results of an innovative professional learning program. In Proceedings of the 35th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
- Bruce, C., Flynn, T., Ross, J., & Moss, J. (2011). Promoting teacher and student mathematics learning through lesson study: a design research approach. In B. Ubuz (Ed.), Proceedings of the thirty-fifth conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 193–200). Ankara: PME.Google Scholar
- Bruce, C., Moss, J., & Flynn, T. (2012). Report on year 1 of the Math for Young Children Lesson Study research project. Toronto: Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat.Google Scholar
- Cheng, Y. L., & Mix, K. S. (2013). Spatial training improves children’s mathematics. Journal of Cognition and Development (advanced online publication). doi:10.1080/15248372.2012.725186.
- Clements, D., & Sarama, J. (2004). Engaging Young children in mathematics: standards for early childhood mathematics education. Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Copley, J. V. (2000). The young child and mathematics. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children. http://www.naeyc.org/store/files/store/TOC/167.pdf. Accessed 11 March 2014.
- Farmer, G., Verdine, B., Lucca, K., Davies, T., Dempsey, R., Newcombe, N., et al. (2013). Putting the pieces together: spatial skills at age 3 predict spatial and math performance at age 5. Seattle: SRCD poster presentation.Google Scholar
- Frick, A., Ferrara, K., & Newcombe, N. S. (2013). Using a touch screen paradigm to assess the development of mental rotation between 3½ and 5½ years of age. Cognitive Processing (advance online publication). doi:10.1007/s10339-012-0534-0.
- Hawes, Z., LeFevre, J., Chang, X. & Bruce, C. (2014). Mental rotation with tangible three-dimensional objects: a new measure sensitive to developmental differences in 4- to 8-year-old children. Mind, Brain, and Education (in press).Google Scholar
- Jones, K. (2001). Appendix 8: spatial thinking and visualization. In Teaching and learning geometry (pp. 11–19): a report of the Royal Society/Joint Mathematical Council Working Group, edited by The Royal Society.Google Scholar
- Mix, K & Cheng, Y. (2012). The relation between space and math: developmental and educational implications. In J. B. Benson (Ed), Advances in child development and behaviour, Vol 42 (pp. 197–243). Burlington: Academic Press, Elsevier Inc.Google Scholar
- Newcombe, N., & Frick, A. (2010). Early education for spatial. Intelligence: why, what, and how. Mind, Brain and Education, 4(3), 102–111.Google Scholar
- Pazzaglia, F., & Moè, A. (2013). Cognitive styles and mental rotation ability in map learning. Cognitive Processing (advance online publication). doi:10.1007/s10339-013-0572-2.
- Shepard, S., & Metzler, D. (1988). Mental rotation: effects of dimensionality of objects and type of task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 3–11.Google Scholar
- Stylianides, A. J., & Stylianides, G. J. (2013). Seeking research-grounded solutions to problems of practice: classroom-based interventions in mathematics education. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(3), 333–340.Google Scholar
- Terlecki, M. S., Newcombe, N.S., & Little, M. (2008). Durable and generalized effects of spatial experience on mental rotation: Gender differences in growth patterns. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22(7), 996–1013.Google Scholar