This paper describes an attempt to design, analyse and refine professional development (PD) resources that encourage the implementation of inquiry-based learning (IBL). We describe the iterative development of the resources in England with over 100 mathematics teachers from secondary, tertiary and adult education and then analyse the impact these resources had on teachers’ beliefs and practices and the issues arising. This evaluation revealed that teachers had moved away from transmission-based orientations, encouraged by the use of less structured tasks and sample lesson plans, but some found it difficult to adopt IBL pedagogies. The most significant issues for teachers may be summarised as: confusing IBL with ‘discovery’ learning; developing and managing collaborative cultures within the classroom; and planning lessons that adapt to the emerging needs of learners.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Ofsted, the Office for Standards in Education, is an independent national inspection service that reports directly to Parliament in the UK.
The Cronbach alpha for the T statements was 0.63.
Adler, J., Ball, D., Krainer, K., Lin, F.-L., & Novotna, J. (2005). Reflections in an emerging field: Researching mathematics teacher education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 60(3), 359–381.
Ahmed, A. (1987). Better mathematics: A curriculum development study. London: HMSO.
Alexander, R. (2008). How can we be sure that the classroom encourages talk for learning? Here is what research shows. Cambridge: Dialogos.
Artigue, M., & Blomhoej, M. (2013). Conceptualising inquiry based education in mathematics. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(6).
Askew, M., Brown, M., Rhodes, V., Johnson, D., & Wiliam, D. (1997). Effective teachers of numeracy, final report. London: Kings College.
Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1–14.
Bereiter, C. (2002). Design research for sustained innovation. Cognitive studies, Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society, 9(3), 321–327.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. London: King’s College London School of Education.
Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003a). Design Experiments in Educational Research. Educational Researcher, 32(1).
Cobb, P., McClain, K., de Silva Lamberg, T., & Dean, C. (2003b). Situating teachers’ instructional practices in the institutional setting of the school and district. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 13–24.
Cohen, D. K. (1990). A revolution in one classroom: The case of Mrs. Oublier. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(3), 311–329.
DBRC. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8.
Engestrom, Y. (Ed.). (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ernest, P. (1991a). The impact of beliefs on the teaching of mathematics. In P. Ernest (Ed.), Mathematics teaching, the state of the art (pp. 249–254). London: Falmer.
Ernest, P. (1991b). The philosophy of mathematics education. Basingstoke, Hants: Falmer.
Even, R. (2005). Integrating knowledge and practice at MANOR in the development of providers of professional development for teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8(4), 343–357.
Fang, Z. (1996). A review of research on teacher beliefs and practices. Educational Research, 38(1), 47–65.
Fullan, M. G. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. London: Cassell.
Garet, M. S., Birman, B. F., Porter, A. C., Desimore, L., & Herman, R. (1999). Designing effective professional development: Lessons from the Eisenhower Program. Washington, DC: US Department for Education.
Guskey, T. R. (1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change. Educational Researcher, 15(5), 5–12.
Hammerness, K., Darling-Hammond, L., Bransford, J., Berliner, D. C., Cochran-Smith, M., McDonald, M., et al. (Eds.). (2005). How teachers learn and develop. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Inoue, N. (2011). Zen and the art of neriage: Facilitating consensus building in mathematics inquiry lessons through lesson study. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14, 5–23.
Jaworski, B. (2008). Inquiry communities in Mathematics Teaching. Teachers and didacticians in collaboration. In K. Krainer & T. Wood (Eds.), International Handbook of Mathematics Teacher Education: Vol. 3. Participants in Mathematics Teacher Education: Individuals, teams, communities and networks. (Vol. 3, pp. 309-330). Rotterdam/TaiPei: Sense Publishers.
Kagan, D. (1992). Implications of research on teacher belief. Educational Psychologist, 27(1), 65–90.
Kelly, A. (2003). Theme issue: The role of design in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 3–4.
Kirschner, P., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: an analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.
Lee, C., & Wiliam, D. (2005). Studying changes in the practice of two teachers developing assessment for learning. Teacher Development, 9(2), 265–280.
Lewis, C. C., Perry, R. R., & Hurd, J. (2009). Improving mathematics instruction through lesson study: A theoretical model and North American case. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(4), 285–304.
Mercer, N. (1995). The guided construction of knowledge. Philadelphia, Adelaide: Clevedon.
Müller, F. H., Andreitz, I., Krainer, K., & Mayr, J. (2011). Effects of a research-based learning approach in teacher professional development. In Y. Li & G. Kaiser (Eds.), Expertise in mathematics instruction: An international perspective (pp. 131–149). New York: Springer.
Mullis, I., V.S., Martin, M. O., & Foy, P. (2008). TIMSS 2007 International Mathematics Report: Findings from IEA’s Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the Fourth and Eighth Grades: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(4), 317–328.
Noyes (2012). It matters which class you are in: student-centred teaching and the enjoyment of learning mathematic. Research in Mathematics Education, 14(3), 273–290.
Ofsted (2006). Evaluating mathematics provision for 14–19-year-olds. London: HMSO.
PRIMAS (2012). Promoting inquiry in mathematics and science education across Europe from http://www.primas-project.eu/.
Rocard, M. (2007). EUR22845—science education now: A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe.
Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap (2nd ed.). New York: The Free Press.
Swain, J., & Swan, M. (2007). Thinking through mathematics: Research report: NRDC.
Swain, J., & Swan, M. (2009). Teachers’ attempts to integrate research-based principles into the teaching of numeracy with post-16 learners. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 14(1), 75–92.
Swan, M. B. (2005). Improving learning in mathematics: challenges and strategies: Department for Education and Skills.
Swan, M. (2006a). Collaborative Learning in Mathematics: A Challenge to our Beliefs and Practices. London: National Institute for Advanced and Continuing Education (NIACE) for the National Research and Development Centre for Adult Literacy and Numeracy (NRDC).
Swan, M. (2006b). Describing mathematics teachers’ beliefs and practices: resources for evaluating design interventions. Research in Education, 75.
Swan, M. (2007). The impact of task-based professional development on teachers’ practices and beliefs: A design research study. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10(4–6), 217–237.
Swan, M. (2011a). Designing tasks that challenge values, beliefs and practices: A model for the professional development of practicing teachers. In P. Sullivan & O. Zaslavski (Eds.), Constructing knowledge for teaching secondary mathematics: Tasks to enhance prospective and practicing teacher learning. Dordrecht: Springer.
Swan, M. (2011b). Towards the creative teaching of mathematics. In P. Thomson & J. Sefton-Green (Eds.), Researching creative learning: Methods and issues (pp. 54–67). Abingdon: Routledge.
Swan, M., Clarke, N., Dawson, C., Evans, S., Jobert, M., & Foster, C. (2012). Mathematics Assessment Project, from http://map.mathshell.org/materials/index.php.
Swan, M., & Green, M. (2002). Learning mathematics through discussion and reflection. London: Learning and Skills Development Agency.
Swan, M., & Pead, D. (2008). Bowland Maths Professional development resources [online]. http://www.bowlandmaths.org.uk, Bowland Trust/Department for Children, Schools and Families.
Swan, M., & Pead, D. (2011). PRIMAS Professional Development Modules, http://primas.mathshell.org/pd.htm (Retrieved 29/5/12).
Swan, M., & Swain, J. (2010). The impact of a professional development programme on the practices and beliefs of numeracy teachers. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 34(2), 165–177.
van den Akker, J., Graveemeijer, K., McKenney, S., & Nieveen, N. (Eds.). (2006). Educational design research. London and New York: Routledge.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Harvard University Press.
Watson, A., & Mason, J. (1998). Questions and prompts for mathematical thinking. Derby: Association of Teachers of Mathematics.
Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wilson, S., & Cooney, T. (2002). Mathematics teacher change and development. In G. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Torner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 127–147). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
This paper is based on work carried out within the following funded projects: Bowland Maths funded by the Bowland Charitable Trust (UK); ‘Learning Mathematics through Discussion and Reflection’ funded by the Learning and Skills Development Agency (UK); ‘Improving Learning in Mathematics’ funded by the Standards Unit, Department for Education and Skills (UK); ‘Maths4Life’ funded by National Research and Development Centre for adult literacy and numeracy (UK), and the PRIMAS project funded by the European Union Seventh Framework Program under grant agreement n° 244380.
About this article
Cite this article
Swan, M., Pead, D., Doorman, M. et al. Designing and using professional development resources for inquiry-based learning. ZDM Mathematics Education 45, 945–957 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0520-8