ZDM

, Volume 45, Issue 4, pp 535–545 | Cite as

Being a mathematics teacher in times of reform

Original Article

Abstract

Within research on mathematics teachers and/or their professional development, the concept of identity emerges as a critique of views of how teaching practice is related to teachers’ ‘internal states’ of knowledge and beliefs. Identity relates teachers’ professional lives to teaching practices and to the contexts in which the teaching and/or professional development occurs. However, what might count as the context still needs in-depth discussion. In order to contribute to the development of a theoretical framework for understanding mathematics teachers’ professional lives, we will draw on one remarkable teacher’s identity as a primary mathematics teacher in relation to one political, sociocultural, and pedagogical context. We use this teacher’s experience to discuss how education policies that create what Ball (2003) called ‘terrors of performativity’ tend to impede the formation of a balanced teacher identity.

References

  1. Avalos, B., & De Los Rios, D. (2013). Reform environment and teacher identity in Chile. In D. B. Napier & S. Majhanovich (Eds.), Education, dominance and identity (pp. 153–176). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ball, S. J. (2000). Performativities and fabrications on the education economy: towards the performative society. Australian Educational Researcher, 27, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Educational Policy, 18, 215–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ball, D., & Bass, H. (2000). Interweaving content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach: knowing and using mathematics. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 83–104). Westport: Ablex.Google Scholar
  5. Bernstein, B. (1996). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  6. Bishop, A. J. (2007). Values in mathematics and science education: An empirical investigation. In U. Gellert & E. Jablonka (Eds.), Mathematisation and demathematisation: Social, philosophical and educational ramifications (pp. 123–139). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  7. Black, L., Mendick, H., & Solomon, Y. (Eds.). (2009a). Mathematical relationships in education: Identities and participation. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Black, L., Mendick, H., & Solomon, Y. (2009b). Pedagogy. In L. Black, H. Mendick, & Y. Solomon (Eds.), Mathematical relationships in education: Identities and participation (pp. 119–121). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Blömeke, S., Kaiser, G., & Lehmann, R. (Eds.). (2010). TEDS-M 2008: Professionelle Kompetenz und Lerngelegenheiten angehender Primarstufenlehrer im internationalen Vergleich (TEDS-M 2008: Professional competence and opportunities to learn of future primary teachers in an international compariso). Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
  10. Blömeke, S., Suhl, U., & Kaiser, G. (2011). Teacher education effectiveness: Quality and equity of future primary teachers’ mathematics and mathematics pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Teacher Education, 62, 154–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brousseau, G. (1990). Le contrat didactique: Le milieu (The didactic contract: The milieu). Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 9, 308–336.Google Scholar
  12. Brown, T., & McNamara, O. (2011). Becoming a mathematics teacher. Identity and identifications. Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Chevallard, Y. (1999). L’analyse des pratiques enseignantes en théorie anthropologique du didactique (The analysis of teachers’ practices within the anthropological theory of didactics). Rechereches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 19, 221–265.Google Scholar
  15. Gellert, U., Barbé, J., & Espinoza, L. (2013). Towards a local integration of theories: Codes and praxeologies in the case of computer-based instruction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82, 303–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ginsburg, M. B. (1986). Reproduction, contradictions, and conceptions of curriculum in preservice teacher education. Curriculum Inquiry, 16, 283–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goldin, G. A. (1990). Epistemology, constructivism, and discovery learning in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Monograph no., 4, 32–47.Google Scholar
  18. Goodchild, S. (2001). Students’ goals: A case study of activity in a mathematics classroom. Bergen: Caspar Forlag.Google Scholar
  19. Greene, M. (1995). Releasing the imagination. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  20. Grigutsch, S., Raatz, U., & Törner, G. (1998). Einstellungen gegenüber Mathematik bei Mathematiklehrern (Mathematics teachers’ attitudes towards mathematics). Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik, 19, 3–45.Google Scholar
  21. Hogden, J., & Askew, M. (2007). Emotion, identity and teacher learning: Becoming a primary mathematics teacher. Oxford Review of Education, 33, 469–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Johansson, M. (2010). Pedagogic identities in the reform of school mathematics. In U. Gellert, E. Jablonka & C. Morgan (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Mathematics Education and Society Conference (2nd ed., pp. 291–300). Berlin, Germany: Freie Universität Berlin. http://www.ewi-psy.fu-berlin.de/en/v/mes6/proceedings/index.html. Accessed 14 March 2013.
  23. Kennedy, M. M. (2002). Knowledge and teaching. Teachers and Teaching, 8, 355–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Klafki, W. (1958). Didaktische Analyse als Kern der Unterrichtsvorbereitung (Analyzing pedagogical content as the basis of lesson preparation). Die Deutsche Schule, 10, 450–471.Google Scholar
  25. Kutschmann, W. (2000). Der Lehrer als exemplarischer Intellektueller. Ein Plädoyer für einen anderen Umgang mit Wissen (The teacher as exemplary intellectual. A plea for dealing with knowledge differently). Die Deutsche Schule, 92, 430–438.Google Scholar
  26. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Leder, G., Pehkonen, E., & Törner, G. (Eds.). (2003). Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education?. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  28. Libertad y Desarrollo (2012). SIMCE 2011: Resultados positivos (SIMCE 2011: Positive results). Temas Públicos, 1058, 9–13. http://www.lyd.org/estudios/temas-publicos. Accessed 14 March 2013.
  29. Mena, I., & Bellei, C. (1998). El desafío de la calidad y la equidad en educación (The challenge of quality and equity in education). In C. Toloza, & E. Lahera (Eds.), Chile en los noventa (pp. 353–404). (Chile in the 1990s). Santiago, Chile: Dolmen Ediciones.Google Scholar
  30. Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and reality: Principles and implications of cognitive psychology. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
  31. Neubrand, M., Seago, N., Agudelo-Valderrama, C., DeBlois, L., & Leikin, R. (2009). The balance of teacher knowledge: Mathematics and pedagogy. In R. Even & D. L. Ball (Eds.), The professional education and development of teachers of mathematics (pp. 211–225). New York: Springer Science+Business Media.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Otte, M. (1994). Das Formale, das Soziale und das Subjektive. Eine Einführung in die Philosophie und Didaktik der Mathematik (The formal, the social and the subjective. An introduction into philosophy and didactics of mathematics). Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp Taschenbuch Wissenschaft.Google Scholar
  33. Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Prawat, R. (1992). Are changes in views about mathematics teaching sufficient? The case of a fifth-grade teacher. The Elementary School Journal, 93, 195–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sacks, H. (1972). On the analysability of stories by children. In J. Gumperz & D. H. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 325–345). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  36. Sacks, H. (1995). Lectures on conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. SIMCE (2011). Informes de resultados para padres y apoderados (Report of results for parents and legal guardians). Ministerio de Educación: Sistema de Medición de Calidad de la Educación. http://www.simce.cl/index.php?id=330. Accessed 14 March 2013.
  39. Smyth, J. (1998). Three rival versions and a critique of teacher staff development. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), International handbook of educational change (pp. 1242–1256). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  40. Stipek, D. J., Givvin, K. B., Salmon, J. M., & MacGyvers, V. L. (2001). Teachers’ beliefs and practices related to mathematics instruction. Teacher and Teacher Education, 17, 213–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Taylor, D. (1998). Social identity and social policy: engagements with postmodern theory. Journal of Social Policy, 27, 329–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Valero, P. (2009). Participating in identities and relationships in mathematics education. In L. Black, H. Mendick, & Y. Solomon (Eds.), Mathematical relationships in education: Identities and participation (pp. 213–226). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Woods, P. A. (2003). Building on Weber to understand governance: exploring the links between identity, democracy and ‘inner distance’. Sociology, 37, 143–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© FIZ Karlsruhe 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Freie Universität BerlinBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Universidad de Santiago de ChileSantiagoChile

Personalised recommendations