Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The relationship of theory and practice in mathematics teacher professional development: an activity theory perspective

  • Original Article
  • Published:
ZDM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes certain interactions between the activity of “teaching” and the activity of “researching” in which the teachers participate in a 52-h professional development course aiming to introduce them to research in mathematics education as a tool for inquiry in their teaching. The teachers are involved in different research tasks such as: reading and presenting research papers; analyzing classroom dialogues and tasks; and designing, implementing, and evaluating collaboratively a classroom teaching intervention. From an activity theory (AT) perspective, and in particular Engeström’s (2001) third generation AT, distinguish two activity systems, the activity system of research and the activity system of teaching, to identify links that the participating teachers make. These links indicate the development of an inquiring stance to mathematics teaching and learning as a means of professional learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Abboud-Blanchard, M., Cazes, C., & Vandebrouck, F. (2007). Teachers’ activity in exercises-based lessons: Some case studies. In D. Pitta-Pantazi & G. Philippou (Eds.), Proceedings of the fifth congress of the European Society for research in mathematics education (pp. 1827–1836). Cyprus: University of Cyprus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boaler, J. (2008). Bridging the gap between research and practice: International examples of success. In M. Menghini, F. Furinghetti, L. Giacardi, & F. Arzarello (Eds.), The first century of the International Commission of Mathematical Instruction. Rome: Proprieta artistic e letteraria Riservata.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, O., & Heater, B. (2010). Understanding change through a high school mathematics teacher’s journey to inquiry-based teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13, 445–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, B., & Walther, G. (1986). Task and activity. In B. Christiansen, B. Howson, & M. Otte (Eds.), Perspectives on mathematics education (pp. 243–307). Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, H. (2008). Vygotsky and research. Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Freitas, E., Wagner, D., Esmonde, I., Knipping, C., Lunney Borden, L., & Reid, D. (2012). Exploring authority and positioning in mathematics classroom discourse: Workshop activities for teacher professional development. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 12(2), 137–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, T. G., & Hensien, S. M. (1999). Changing instructional practice through action research. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 2, 187–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (1994). Teachers as collaborative thinkers: Activity-theoretical study of an innovative teacher team. In I. Carlgren, G. Handal, & S. Vaage (Eds.), Teachers’ minds and actions (pp. 43–61). London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14, 133–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (2008). From teams to knots: Activity-theoretical studies of collaboration and learning at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, M., Sanchez, V., Escudero, I., & Llinares, S. (2006). The dialectic relationship between research and practice in mathematics teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 109–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. M. (2001). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25, 99–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, L. C., Alston, A., & Murata, A. (2011). Lesson study research and practice in mathematics education. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski, B. (2003). Research practice into/influencing mathematics teaching and teacher development: Towards a theoretical framework based on co-learning partnerships. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 54, 249–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski, B. (2006). Theory and practice in mathematics teaching development: Critical inquiry as a mode of learning in teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 187–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski, B., & Goodchild, S. (2006). Inquiry community in an activity theory frame. In J. Navotná, H. Moraová, M. Krátká, & N. Stehliková (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 353–360). Prague: Charles University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski, B., & Potari, D. (2009). Bridging the macro- and micro-divide: Using an activity theory model to capture sociocultural complexity in mathematics teaching and its development. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72, 219–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski, B., Robinson, G., Matthews, J., & Croft, T. (2013). Issues in teaching mathematics to engineering students to promote conceptual understanding: A study of the use of GeoGebra and inquiry-based tasks. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education. Special issue “Activity theoretic approaches to technology-enhanced mathematics learning orchestration” (to appear).

  • Krainer, K. (2003). Teams, communities and networks. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6, 93–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krainer, K. (2011). Teachers as stakeholders in mathematics education research. In B. Ubuz (Ed.), Proceedings of the 35th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 47–62). Ankara: PME.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leont’ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness and personality. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellin-Olsen, S. (1987). The politics of mathematics education. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitkethly, A., & Hunting, R. (1996). A review of recent research in the area of initial fraction concepts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 30, 5–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponte, J. P. (2012). A practice-oriented professional development programme to support the introduction of a new mathematics curriculum in Portugal. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education (online first).

  • Potari, D., Sakonidis, H., Chatzigoula, R., & Manaridis, A. (2010). Teachers’ and researchers’ collaboration in analysing mathematics teaching: A context for professional reflection and development. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13, 473–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pozzi, S., Noss, R., & Hoyles, C. (1998). Tools in practice, mathematics in use. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 36(2), 105–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W. M. (2005). Mathematical inscriptions and the reflexive elaboration of understanding: An ethnography of graphing and numeracy in a fish hatchery. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 7(2), 135–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruthven, K. (2000). Linking researching with teaching: Towards synergy of scholarly and craft knowledge. In L. D. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 581–598). New Jersey: LEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sfard, A., & Prusak, A. (2005). Telling identities: In search of an analytic tool for investigating learning as a culturally shaped activity. Educational Researcher, 34, 14–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skott, J. (2010). Shifting the direction of belief research: From beliefs to patterns of participation. In M. F. Pinto & T. F. Kawasaki (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 193–200). Brazil: PME.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffe, L. P. (2004). On the construction of learning trajectories of children: The case of commensurate fractions. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6, 129–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabach, M. (2005). Research and teaching—Can one person do both? A case study. In J. Novotná, H. Moraová, M. Krátká, & N. Stehlíková (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 5, pp. 233–240). Prague: PME.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triantafillou, C., & Potari, D. (2010). Mathematical practices in a technological workplace: The role of tools. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 74(3), 275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, A., & Mason, J. (2007). Taken as shared: A review of common assumptions about mathematical tasks in teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 19, 206–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. S., & Wake, G. D. (2007). Black boxes in workplace mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 64, 317–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Despina Potari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Potari, D. The relationship of theory and practice in mathematics teacher professional development: an activity theory perspective. ZDM Mathematics Education 45, 507–519 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0498-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0498-2

Keywords

Navigation