Connecting mathematical creativity to mathematical ability
This study aims to investigate whether there is a relationship between mathematical ability and mathematical creativity, and to examine the structure of this relationship. Furthermore, in order to validate the relationship between the two constructs, we will trace groups of students that differ across mathematical ability and investigate the relationships amongst these students’ performance on a mathematical ability test and the components of mathematical creativity. Data were collected by administering two tests, a mathematical ability and a mathematical creativity test, to 359 elementary school students. Mathematical ability was considered as a multidimensional construct, including quantitative ability (number sense and pre-algebraic reasoning), causal ability (examination of cause–effect relations), spatial ability (paper folding, perspective and spatial rotation abilities), qualitative ability (processing of similarity and difference relations) and inductive/deductive ability. Mathematical creativity was defined as a domain-specific characteristic, enabling individuals to be characterized by fluency, flexibility and originality in the domain of mathematics. The data analysis revealed that there is a positive correlation between mathematical creativity and mathematical ability. Moreover, confirmatory factor analysis suggested that mathematical creativity is a subcomponent of mathematical ability. Further, latent class analysis showed that three different categories of students can be identified varying in mathematical ability. These groups of students varying in mathematical ability also reflected three categories of students varying in mathematical creativity.
KeywordsMathematical creativity Mathematical ability Alternative models Fluency Flexibility Originality
- Bahar, A. K., & Maker, C. J. (2011). Exploring the relationship between mathematical creativity and mathematical achievement. Asia-Pacific Journal of Gifted and Talented Education, 3(1), 33–48.Google Scholar
- Baran, G., Erdogan, S., & Çakmak, A. (2011). A study on the relationship between six-year-old children’s creativity and mathematical ability. International Education Studies, 4(1), 105–111.Google Scholar
- Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Chi, M. T., Glaser, R., & Farr, M. J. (1988). The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Iowa Department of Education (1989). A guide to developing higher order thinking across the curriculum. Des Moines, IA: Department of Education. Retrieved from ERIC database (ED 306 550).Google Scholar
- Krutetskii, V. A. (1976). The psychology of mathematical abilities in schoolchildren. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Leikin, R. (2007). Habits of mind associated with advanced mathematical thinking and solution spaces of mathematical tasks. In D. Pitta-Pantazi, & G. Philippou (Eds.), Proceedings of the fifth conference of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education—CERME-5 (pp. 2330–2339). http://ermeweb.free.fr/Cerme5.pdf. Accessed 17 Sep 2012.
- Levav-Waynberg, A., & Leikin, R. (2009). Multiple solutions for a problem: A tool for evaluation of mathematical thinking in geometry. In V. Durand-Guerrier, S. Soury-Lavergne, & F. Arzarello (Eds.), Proceedings of sixth conference of European Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 776–785). Lyon: Institut National de Recherche Pédagogique.Google Scholar
- Mann, E. (2005). Mathematical creativity and school mathematics: Indicators of mathematical creativity in middle school students. Doctoral dissertation. http://www.gifted.uconn.edu/siegle/Dissertations/Eric%20Mann.pdf. Accessed 17 Sep 2012.
- Marcoulides, G. A., & Schumacker, R. E. (1996). Advanced capacity equation modelling: Issues and techniques. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Murphy, K. R., & Davidshofer, C. O. (2001). Psychological testing: Principles and application (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
- Sheffield, L. (2009). Developing mathematical creativity—questions may be the answer. In R. Leikin, A. Berman, & B. Koichu (Eds.), Creativity in mathematics and the education of gifted students (pp. 87–100). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
- Silver, E. A. (1997). Fostering creativity though instruction rich mathematical problem solving and problem posing. International Reviews on Mathematical Education, 29(3), 75–80.Google Scholar
- Sriraman, B. (2005). Are giftedness and creativity synonyms in mathematics? An analysis of constructs within the professional and school realms. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17, 20–36.Google Scholar
- Starko, J. A. (1994). Creativity in the classroom. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
- Sternberg, R. J. (1999). Handbook of creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Torrance, E. P. (1995). The ‘beyonders’ in why fly? A philosophy of creativity. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
- Weisberg, R. W. (1999). Creativity and knowledge: A challenge to theories. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 226–250). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar