Abstract
Considerations of how mathematics can be effectively taught and learnt may be cognitive, affective or sociocultural in approach. ‘What students value in effective mathematics learning’ is a research study of the Third Wave Project, an international consortium of research teams adopting a sociocultural approach to investigate the harnessing of relevant values to optimise school mathematics teaching and learning. This paper seeks to contextualise the study, as part of the study examines what the high-achieving East Asian mathematics students value. The study is framed by knowledge relating to the relative cultural influence on effectiveness in mathematics learning, Alan Bishop’s values in mathematics education and the role of interactions in education, in particular David Tripp’s idea of critical incidents as reflecting professional judgement (and, thus, underlying values). Features of the innovative qualitative research design are also presented, which include the facilitation of photo-voice, the argument for an international collaborative team and focus group interviews for all values research, and a two-stage data analysis process aimed at clarifying both etic and emic perspectives.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Askew, M., Brown, M., Rhodes, V., Johnson, D., & William, D. (1997). Effective teachers of numeracy. Final report. London: King’s College.
Askew, M., Hodgen, J., Hossain, S., & Bretscher, N. (2010). Values and variables: Mathematics education in high-performing countries. London: Nuffield Foundation.
Australia Department of Education Science and Training. (2004). What’s ‘making the difference’: Achieving outstanding numeracy learning outcomes in NSW primary schools (main report). Canberra: Australia Department of Education Science and Training.
Bishop, A. J. (1996). How should mathematics teaching in modern societies relate to cultural values—some preliminary questions. Paper presented at the Seventh Southeast Asian conference on Mathematics Education, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Bishop, A. J. (1999). Educating student teachers about values in mathematics education. In F.-L. Lin (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1999 international conference on mathematics teacher education (Vol. 2, pp. 1–6). Taipei: National Taiwan Normal University.
Brand, B. R., Glasson, G. E., & Green, A. M. (2006). Sociocultural factors influencing students’ learning in science and mathematics: an analysis of the perspectives of African American students. School Science and Mathematics, 106(5), 228–236.
Broadfoot, P. (2000). Comparative education for the 21st century: retrospect and prospect. Comparative Education, 36(3), 357–371.
Brooks, M. (2004). Drawing: the social construction of knowledge. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 29(2), 41–49.
Cai, J. (2007). What is effective mathematics teaching? A study of teachers from Australia, mainland China, Hong Kong SAR, and the United States. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 39, 265–270.
Cai, J., & Wang, T. (2010). Conceptions of effective mathematics teaching within a cultural context: perspectives of teachers from China and the United States. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13, 265–287.
Clarke, D. (2003). The structure of mathematics lessons in Australia. Paper presented at the 84th annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
Cretchley, P. C. (2008). Advancing research into affective factors in mathematics learning: Clarifying key factors, terminology and measurement. In M. Goos, R. Brown, & K. Makar (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 147–153). Brisbane: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia Incorporated.
Dede, Y. (2006). Mathematics educational values of college students towards function concept. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2(1), 82–102.
Denzin, N. K. (1978). Sociological methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.
FitzSimons, G., Seah, W. T., Bishop, A., & Clarkson, P. (2001). Beyond numeracy: Values in the mathematics classroom. In J. Bobis, B. Perry, & M. Mitchelmore (Eds.), Numeracy and beyond: Proceedings of the twenty-fourth annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia Incorporated held at the University of Sydney, 30 June–4 July, 2001 (Vol. 1, pp. 202–209). Turramurra: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia Incorporated.
Gee, J. P. (1999). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. New York: Routledge.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1981). Effective evaluation: Improving the usefulness of evaluation results through responsive and naturalistic approaches. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Halstead, M. (1996). Values and values education in schools. In J. M. Halstead & M. J. Taylor (Eds.), Values in education and education in values (pp. 3–14). London: Falmer Press.
Hawthorne, G., Davidson, N., Quinn, K., McCrate, F., Winkler, I., Lucas, R., et al. (2006). Issues in conducting cross-cultural research: implementation of an agreed international protocol designed by the WHOQOL Group for the conduct of focus groups eliciting the quality of life of older adults. Quality of Life Research, 15, 1257–1270.
Ho, S. C., Cheung, S. P., Chun, K. W., Lau, K. C., Lau, K. L., Wong, K. L., et al. (2011). The fourth HKPISA report: PISA2009. Hong Kong: Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Judge, H., Lemosse, M., Paine, L., & Sedlak, M. (1994). The university and the teachers: France, the United States, England. Oxford Studies in Comparative Education, 4(1–2), 265–285.
Keitel, C. (2003). Values in mathematics classroom practice: The students’ perspective. Paper presented at the Conference of the Learners’ Perspective Study international research team.
Klassen, R. M. (2004). Optimism and realism: a review of self-efficacy from a cross-cultural perspective. International Journal of Psychology, 39(3), 205–230.
Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Law, H. Y., Wong, N. Y., & Lee, N. Y. L. (2010). The third wave: Regional and cross-regional studies of values in effective mathematics education—Hong Kong. In Y. Shimizu, Y. Sekiguchi, & K. Hino (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th East Asia regional conference on mathematics education (Vol. 2, pp. 111–118). Tokyo: Japan Society of Mathematical Education.
Lazaridou, A. (2007). Values in principals’ thinking when solving problems. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 10(4), 339–356.
Lee, J. (2009). Universals and specifics of math self-concept, math-efficacy, and math anxiety across 41 PISA 2003 participating countries. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 355–365.
Lerman, S. (2001). Cultural, discursive psychology: a sociocultural approach to studying the teaching and learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46, 87–113.
Lim, C. S. (2010). Using NVivo 8 to explore photo-voice. In J. Lim (Ed.), Proceedings of the international workshop on computer-aided qualitative research Asia (pp. 48–59). The Netherlands: Merlien Institute.
Lim, C. S., & Kor, L. K. (2010). Mathematics classroom practice of ‘excellent’ teachers: What can we learn? In Y. Shimizu, Y. Sekiguchi, & K. Hino (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th East Asia regional conference on mathematics education (Vol. 1, pp. 118–126). Tokyo: Japan Society of Mathematics Education.
McConatha, J. T., & Schnell, F. (1995). The confluence of values: implications for educational research and policy. Educational Practice and Theory, 17(2), 79–83.
Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Neuman, W. L. (2003). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
Norman, O., Ault, C., Bentz, B., & Meskimen, L. (2001). The black–white ‘achievement gap’ as a perennial challenge of urban science education: a sociocultural and historical overview with implications for research and practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(10), 1101–1114.
OECD. (2004). Learning for tomorrow’s world: First results from PISA 2003. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development.
Opdenakker, M.-C., & van Damme, J. (2006). Teacher characteristics and teaching styles as effectiveness enhancing factors of classroom practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 1–21.
Peng, A., & Nyroos, M. (2010). Differences and similarities of different group students’ values in effective mathematics lessons. In B. Yoshi (Ed.), Proceedings of the 5th East Asian conference on mathematics education, Tokyo, Japan.
Pepin, B. (1999). Epistemologies, beliefs and conceptions of mathematics teaching and learning: The theory, and what is manifested in mathematics teachers’ work in England, France and Germany. Paper presented at the TNTEE conference, Lisbon, Portugal.
Perry, B. (2007). Australian teachers’ views of effective mathematics teaching and learning. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 39, 271–286.
Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York, NY: The Free Press.
Seah, W. T. (2005). The negotiation of perceived value differences by immigrant teachers of mathematics in Australia. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.
Seah, W. T. (2007). Qualities co-valued in effective mathematics lessons in Australia: Preliminary findings. In J. H. Woo, H. C. Lew, K. S. Park, & D. Y. Seo (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 161–168). Seoul: International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.
Seah, W. T. (2010a). The ‘third wave’: values associated with effective learning of mathematics in Australian primary classrooms. Research in Mathematics Education, 14(2), 99–114.
Seah, W. T. (2010b). The third wave: Australian students’ perspectives of effective mathematics learning in primary schools. In Y. Shimizu, Y. Sekiguchi, & K. Hino (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th East Asia regional conference on mathematics education (Vol. 2, pp. 228–235). Tokyo: Japan Society of Mathematical Education.
Seah, W. T. (2011). Effective mathematics learning in two Australian Primary classes: Exploring the underlying values. In B. Ubuz (Ed.), Proceedings of the 35th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 129–136). Ankara: PME.
Seah, W. T., Atweh, B., Clarkson, P., & Ellerton, N. (2008). Sociocultural perspectives in mathematics teaching and learning. In H. Forgasz, A. Barkatsas, A. Bishop, B. Clarke, S. Keast, W. T. Seah, & P. Sullivan (Eds.), Research in mathematics education in Australasia 2004–2007 (pp. 223–253). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Seah, W. T., Barkatsas, A., Sullivan, P., & Li, Z. (2010). Chinese students’ perspectives of effective mathematics learning: An exploratory study. In T. Desmond (Ed.), The Asian conference on education official conference proceedings 2010 (pp. 389–403). Japan: International Academic Forum.
Seah, W. T., & Kalogeropoulos, P. (2006). Teachers of effective mathematics lessons: What gets valued in their practice? In J. Ocean, C. Walta, M. Breed, J. Virgona, & J. Horwood (Eds.), Mathematics: The way forward (pp. 279–287). Melbourne: The Mathematical Association of Victoria.
Stewart, D. W., & Shamdasani, P. N. (1990). Focus groups: Theory and practice. Newbury Park: Sage.
Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The Teaching Gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: Free Press.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Tan, S. F., & Lim, C. S. (2010). Effective mathematics lesson from the lenses of primary pupils: preliminary analysis. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 242–247.
Triandis, H. C. (1964). Cultural influences upon cognitive processes. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 1–48). New York: Academic Press.
Tripp, D. (1993). Critical incidents in teaching: Developing professional judgement. London: Routledge.
UNESCO (n.d.). Education. http://www.unesco.org/new/en/education/about-us/. Accessed 27 Feb 2012.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Werner, O., & Campbell, D. T. (1970). Translating, working through interpreters, and the problem of decentering. In R. Naroll & R. Cohen (Eds.), A handbook of method in cultural anthropology (pp. 398–420). NY: American Museum of Natural History.
Wong, N. Y. (2004). The CHC learner’s phenomenon: Its implications on mathematics education. In L. Fan, N. Y. Wong, J. Cai, & S. Li (Eds.), How Chinese learn mathematics: Perspectives from insiders (pp. 503–534). Singapore: World Scientific.
Wong, N. Y. (2007). Hong Kong teachers’ views of effective mathematics teaching and learning. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 39, 301–314.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Seah, W.T., Wong, N.Y. What students value in effective mathematics learning: a ‘Third Wave Project’ research study. ZDM Mathematics Education 44, 33–43 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0391-4
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0391-4