The role of metacognition in mathematics education is analyzed based on theoretical and empirical work from the last four decades. Starting with an overview on different definitions, conceptualizations and models of metacognition in general, the role of metacognition in education, particularly in mathematics education, is discussed. The article emphasizes the importance of metacognition in mathematics education, summarizing empirical evidence on the relationships between various aspects of metacognition and mathematics performance. As a main result of correlational studies, it can be shown that the impact of declarative metacognition on mathematics performance is substantial (sharing about 15–20% of common variance). Moreover, numerous intervention studies have demonstrated that “normal” learners as well as those with especially low mathematics performance do benefit substantially from metacognitive instruction procedures.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Allardice, B. S., & Ginsburg, H. P. (1983). Children’s psychological difficulties in mathematics. In H. P. Ginsburg (Ed.), The development of mathematical thinking. New York: Academic Press.
Artelt, C., Schiefele, U., & Schneider, W. (2001). Predictors of reading literacy. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 16, 363–383.
Best, D. L., & Ornstein, P. A. (1986). Children’s generation and communication of mnemonic organizational strategies. Developmental Psychology, 22, 845–853.
Braten, I., & Throndsen, I. S. (1998). Cognitive strategies in mathematics. Part II: Teaching a more advanced addition strategy to an eight-year-old girl with learning difficulties. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 42, 151–171.
Brophy, J. (1986). Teaching and learning mathematics: Where research should be going. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 17, 323–346.
Brown, A. L. (1978). Knowing when, where, and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (pp. 77–165). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Brown, A. L., Bransford, J. D., Ferrara, R. A., & Campione, J. C. (1983). Learning, remembering, and understanding. In J. H. Flavell & E. M. Markham (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Cognitive development (pp. 77–166). New York: Wiley.
Carr, M., Alexander, J., & Folds-Bennett, T. (1994). Metacognition and mathematics strategy use. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 8, 583–595.
Carr, M., & Jessup, D. L. (1995). Cognitive and metacognitive predictors of mathematics strategy use. Learning and Instruction, 7, 235–247.
Carr, M., Kurtz, B. E., Schneider, W., Turner, L. A., & Borkowski, J. G. (1989). Strategy acquisition and transfer: Environmental influences on metacognitive development. Developmental Psychology, 25, 765–771.
Cavanaugh, J. C., & Perlmutter, M. (1982). Metamemory: A critical examination. Child Development, 53, 11–28.
Clarke, D. J., Waywood, A., & Stephens, M. (1993). Probing the structure of mathematical writing. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 25(3), 235–250.
Coffman, J. L., Ornstein, P. A., McCall, L. E., & Curran, P. J. (2008). Linking teachers’ memory-relevant language and the development of children’s memory skills. Developmental Psychology, 44, 1640–1654.
Cohors-Fresenborg, E., & Kaune, C. (2001). Mechanisms of the taking effect of metacognition in understanding processes in mathematics teaching. In G. Törner, R. Bruder, N. Neill, A. Peter-Koop, & B. Wollring (Eds.), Developments in mathematics education in German-speaking countries, selected papers from the annual conference on didactics of mathematics, Ludwigsburg (pp. 29–38). Hildesheim: Franzbecker.
Cornoldi, C., Lucangeli, D., Caponi, B., Falco, G., Focchiatti, R., & Todeschini, M. (1995). Matematica e Metacognizione. Trento: Erickson.
Desoete, A., Roeyers, H., & De Clercq, A. (2001). EPA2000: Een instrument om metacognitieve en rekenvaardigheden te meten. [EPA2000: An instrument for measuring metacognitive and arithmetic skills]. Kind en Adolescent, 22(2), 85–94.
Desoete, A., Roeyers, H., & De Clercq, A. (2003). Can offline metacognition enhance mathematical problem solving? Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 188–200.
Desoete, A., & Veenman, M. (Eds.). (2006a). Metacognition in mathematics education. Haupauge, NY: Nova Science.
Desoete, A., & Veenman, M. (2006b). Metacognitions in mathematics: Critical issues on nature, theory, assessment and treatment. In A. Desoete & M. Veenman (Eds.), Metacognition in mathematics education (pp. 1–10). Haupauge, NY: Nova Science.
Flavell, J. H. (1971). First discussant’s comments: What is memory development the development of? Human Development, 14, 272–278.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring. A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.
Flavell, J. H., Miller, P. H., & Miller, S. A. (2002). Cognitive development (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Flavell, J. H., & Wellman, H. M. (1977). Metamemory. In R. Kail & J. Hagen (Eds.), Perspectives on the development of memory and cognition (pp. 3–33). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Garofalo, J., & Lester, F. K. (1985). Metacognition, cognitive monitoring, and mathematical performance. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 16, 163–176.
Ghatala, E. S., Levin, J. R., Pressley, M., & Goodwin, D. (1986). A componential analysis of effects of derived and supplied strategy–utility information on children’s strategy selections. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 41, 76–92.
Goswami, U. (2008). Cognitive development—The learning brain (2nd ed.). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., & VanLehn, K. (2005). Scaffolding deep comprehension strategies through Point & Query, AutoTutor, and iSTART. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 225–234.
Holland Joyner, M. H., & Kurtz-Costes, B. (1997). Metamemory development. In N. Cowan (Ed.), The development of memory in childhood (pp. 275–300). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
Kaune, C. (2006). Reflection and metacognition in mathematics education—tools for the improvement of teaching quality. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 38(4), 350–360.
Kramarski, B. (2008). Promoting teachers’ algebraic reasoning and self-regulation with metacognitive guidance. Metacognition and Learning, 3(2), 83–99.
Kramarski, B., & Mevarech, Z. R. (2003). Enhancing mathematical reasoning in the classroom: The effects of cooperative learning and meta-cognitive training. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 281–310.
Kreutzer, M. A., Leonard, C., & Flavell, J. H. (1975). An interview study of children’s knowledge about memory. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 40(serial no. 159).
Kron-Sperl, V., Schneider, W., & Hasselhorn, M. (2008). The development and effectiveness of memory strategies in kindergarten and elementary school: Findings from the Würzburg and Göttingen longitudinal studies. Cognitive Development, 23, 79–104.
Kuhn, D. (1999). Metacognitive development. In L. Balter & C. S. Tamis-LeMonda (Eds.), Child Psychology: A Handbook of Contemporary Issues (pp. 259–286). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
Kuhn, D. (2000). Theory of mind, metacognition, and reasoning: A life-span perspective. In P. Mitchell & K. J. Riggs (Eds.), Children’s reasoning and the mind (pp. 301–326). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
Lester, F. K. (1982). Building bridges between psychological and mathematics education research on problem solving. In F. K. Lester & J. Garofalo (Eds.), Mathematical problem solving (pp. 55–85). Philadelphia: The Franklin Institute Press.
Lockl, K., & Schneider, W. (2002). Developmental trends in children’s feeling-of-knowing judgements. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26, 327–333.
Lucangeli, D., & Cornoldi, C. (1997). Mathematics and metacognition: What is the nature of the relationship? Mathematical Cognition, 3, 121–139.
Mevarech, Z. R., & Kramarski, B. (1997). IMPROVE: A multidimensional method for teaching mathematics in heterogeneous classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 365–394.
Mevarech, Z. R., & Kramarski, B. (2003). The effects of metacognitive training versus worked-out examples on students’ mathematical reasoning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(4), 449–471.
Mevarech, Z. R., Tabuk, A., & Sinai, O. (2006). Meta-cognitive instruction in mathematics classrooms: Effects on the solution of different kinds of problems. In A. Desoete & M. Veenman (Eds.), Metacognition in mathematics education (pp. 73–81). Haupauge, NY: Nova Science.
Moely, B. E., Santulli, K. A., & Obach, M. S. (1995). Strategy instruction, metacognition, and motivation in the elementary school classroom. In F. E. Weinert & W. Schneider (Eds.), Memory performance and competencies: Issues in growth and development (pp. 301–321). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: an evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups (NIH Publication No. 00-4754). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1994). Why investigate metacognition? In J. Metcalfe & A. P. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition. Knowing about knowing (pp. 1–25). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Nunes, T., Schliemann, A. D., & Carraher, D. W. (1993). Street mathematics and school mathematics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
OECD (2004). Learning for tomorrow’s world. First results from PISA 2003. Paris: OECD.
Palincsar, A. S. (1986). The role of dialogue in providing scaffolded instruction. Educational Psychologist, 21, 73–98.
Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117–175.
Paris, S. G., & Oka, E. R. (1986). Children’s reading strategies, metacognition, and motivation. Developmental Review, 6, 25–56.
Pintrich, P., Wolters, C. A., & Baxter, G. P. (2000). Assessing metacognition and self-regulated learning. In G. Schraw & J. C. Impara (Eds.), Issues in the measurement of metacognition (pp. 43–97). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements, University of Nebraska Press.
Polya, G. (1957). How to solve it (2nd ed.). New York: Doubleday.
Polya, G. (1973). Induction and analogy in mathematics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Pressley, M. (1986). The relevance of the Good Strategy User model to the teaching of mathematics. Educational Psychologist, 21, 139–161.
Pressley, M. (1995). What is intellectual development about in the 1990s? In F. E. Weinert & W. Schneider (Eds.), Memory performance and competencies: Issues in growth and development (pp. 1–25). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Pressley, M. (2002). Comprehension strategies instruction. In C. C. Block & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 11–27). New York: Guilford Press.
Pressley, M., Borkowski, J. G., & O’Sullivan, J. T. (1985). Children’s metamemory and the teaching of memory strategies. In D. L. Forrest-Pressley, G. E. MacKinnon, & T. G. Waller (Eds.), Metacognition, cognition, and human performance (Vol. 1, pp. 111–153). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Pressley, M., Borkowski, J. G., & Schneider, W. (1987). Cognitive strategies: Good strategy user’s coordinate metacognition and knowledge. In R. Vasta & G. Whitehurst (Eds.), Annals of Child Development (Vol. 5, pp. 89–129). New York: JAI.
Pressley, M., Borkowski, J. G., & Schneider, W. (1989). Good information processing: What it is and what education can do to promote it. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 857–867.
Renkl, A. (1996). Träges Wissen: Wenn Erlerntes nicht genutzt wird. Psychologische Rundschau, 47, 78–92.
Russell, R. L., & Ginsburg, H. P. (1981). Cognitive analysis of children’s mathematical difficulties. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester.
Schlagmüller, M., & Schneider, W. (2007). WLST-12. Würzburger Lesestrategie Wissenstest für die Klassen 7 bis 12. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Schneider, W. (1999). The development of metamemory in children. In D. Gopher & A. Koriat (Eds.), Attention and performance XVII: Cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application (pp. 487–513). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Schneider, W. (2010). Memory development in childhood and adolescence. In U. Goswami (Ed.), The Blackwell handbook of cognitive development. London, UK: Blackwell (in press).
Schneider, W., Körkel, J., & Weinert, F. E. (1987). The effects of intelligence, self-concept, and attributional style on metamemory and memory behavior. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 10, 281–299.
Schneider, W., & Lockl, K. (2002). The development of metacognitive knowledge in children and adolescents. In T. J. Perfect & B. L. Schwartz (Eds.), Applied metacognition (pp. 224–257). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Schneider, W., & Lockl, K. (2008). Procedural metacognition in children: Evidence for developmental trends. In J. Dunlosky & B. Bjork (Eds.), A handbook of memory and metacognition. Mahwah, NY: Erlbaum.
Schneider, W., & Pressley, M. (1997). Memory development between 2 and 20. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1983). Episodes and executive decisions in mathematical problem solving. In R. Lesh & M. Landau (Eds.), Acquisition of mathematics concepts and processes (pp. 345–395). New York: Academic Press.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1987). What’s all that fuss about metacognition? In A. H. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Cognitive science and mathematics education (pp. 189–215). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334–370). New York: Macmillan.
Schraw, G. (1994). The effect of metacognitive knowledge on local and global monitoring. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 143–154.
Silver, E. A. (1982). Knowledge organization and mathematical problem solving. In F. K. Lester & J. Garofalo (Eds.), Mathematical problem solving (pp. 15–25). Philadelphia: Franklin Institute Press.
Sjuts, J. (2002). Metacognition in mathematics lessons. In H.-G. Weigand et al. (Eds.): Developments in mathematics education in German-speaking countries. Selected papers from the annual conference on didactics of mathematics, Bern, 1999 (pp. 76–87). Hildesheim: Verlag Franzbecker.
Stillman, G. A., & Galbraith, P. L. (1998). Applying mathematics with real world connections: Metacognitive characteristics of secondary students. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 36(2), 157–195.
Teong, S. K. (2003). The effect of metacognitive training on mathematical word-problem solving. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(1), 46–55.
Van Luit, J. E. H., & Kroesbergen, E. H. (2006). Teaching metacognitive skills to students with mathematical disabilities. In A. Desoete & M. Veenman (Eds.), Metacognition in mathematics education (pp. 177–190). Haupauge, NY: Nova Science.
Veenman, M. V. J. (2006). The role of intellectual and metacognitive skills in math problem solving. In A. Desoete & M. Veenman (Eds.), Metacognition in mathematics education (pp. 35–50). Haupauge, NY: Nova Science.
Verschaffel, L. (1999). Realistic mathematical modelling and problem solving in the upper elementary school: Analysis and improvement. In J. H. M. Hamers, J. E. H. Van Luit, & B. Csapo (Eds.), Teaching and learning thinking skills. Contexts of learning (pp. 215–240). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Wang, M. C., Haertel, G. D., & Walberg, H. J. (1993). Toward a knowledge base for school learning. Review of Educational Research, 63, 249–294.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Tsikalas, K. E. (2005). Can computer-based learning environments (CBLEs) be used as self-regulatory tools to enhance learning? Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 267–271.
About this article
Cite this article
Schneider, W., Artelt, C. Metacognition and mathematics education. ZDM Mathematics Education 42, 149–161 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-010-0240-2
- Mathematics achievement
- Training effects