Skip to main content
Log in

Perfect subtree property for weakly compact cardinals

  • Published:
Israel Journal of Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigate the consistency strength of the statement: κ is weakly compact and there is no tree on κ with exactly κ+ many branches. We show that this statement fails strongly (in the sense that there is a sealed tree with exactly κ+ many branches) if there is no inner model with a Woodin cardinal. Moreover, we show that for a weakly compact cardinal κ the nonexistence of a tree on κ with exactly κ+ many branches and, in particular, the Perfect Subtree Property for κ, implies the consistency of AD + DC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Andretta, I. Neeman and J. Steel, The domestic levels of K c are iterable, Israel Journal of Mathematics 125 (2001), 157–201.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. A. W. Apter and J. D. Hamkins, Indestructible weakly compact cardinals and the necessity of supercompactness for certain proof schemata, Mathematical Logic Quarterly 47 (2001), 563–571.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. P. Erdös, Some set-theoretical properties of graphs, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Revista A. Matematicas y Fysica Teoretica 3 (1942), 363–367.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Gitik, R. Schindler and S. Shelah, PCF theory and Woodin cardinals, in Logic Colloquium’ 02, Lecture Notes in Logic, Vol. 27, Association for Symbolic Logic, La Jolla, CA, 2006, pp. 172–205.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. D. Hamkins, Gap forcing, Israel Journal of Mathematics 125 (2001), 237–252.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. T. J. Jech, Set Theory, Springer Monographs in Mathematics, Springer, Berlin, 2003.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. T. J. Jech, Trees, Journal of Symbolic Logic 36 (1971), 1–14.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. R. Jensen, E. Schimmerling, R. Schindler and J. Steel, Stacking mice, Journal of Symbolic Logic 74 (2009), 315–335.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. R. Jensen and J. Steel, K without the measurable, Journal of Symbolic Logic 78 (2013), 708–734.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. R. B. Jensen, A New Fine Structure, Handwritten notes, https://www.mathematik.hu-berlin.de/~raesch/org/jensen.html.

  11. P. Larson and G. Sargsyan, Failure of square inmax extensions of Chang models, https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.00322.

  12. I. Neeman and J. Steel, Equiconsistencies at subcompact cardinals, Archive for Mathematical Logic 55 (2016), 207–238.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Poór, On the spectra of cardinalities of branches of Kurepa trees, Archive for Mathematical Logic 60 (2021), 927–966.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Poór and S. Shelah, Characterizing the spectra of cardinalities of branches of Kurepa trees, Pacific Journal of Mathematics 311 (2021), 423–453.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. E. Schimmerling and J. R. Steel, The maximality of the core model, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 351 (1999), 3119–3141.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. S. Shelah and R. Jin, Planting Kurepa trees and killing Jech—Kunen trees in a model by using one inaccessible cardinal, Fundamenta Mathematica 141 (1992), 287–296.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. J. Silver, The independence of Kurepa’s conjecture and two-cardinal conjectures in model theory, in Axiomatic Set Theory Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, Vol. 13, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1971, pp. 383–390.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. D. Sinapova and I. Souldatos, Kurepa trees and spectra of \({{\cal L}_{{\omega _1},\omega}}\), Archive for Mathematical Logic 59 (2020), 939–956.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. J. R. Steel, The Core Model Iterability Problem, Lecture Notes in Logic, vol. 8, Springer, Berlin—New York, 1996.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. J. R. Steel, An outline of inner model theory, in Handbook of Set Theory, Springer, Dordrecht, 2010, pp. 1595–1684.

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. S. Unger, Fragility and indestructibility II, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 166 (2015), 1110–1122.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandra Müller.

Additional information

The first-listed author was supported by Austrian Science Fund (FWF) Lise Meitner grant 2650-N35.

The second-listed author was supported by L’ORÉAL Austria, in collaboration with the Austrian UNESCO Commission and in cooperation with the Austrian Academy of Sciences — Fellowship Determinacy and Large Cardinals and Elise Richter grant number V844 of the FWF.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hayut, Y., Müller, S. Perfect subtree property for weakly compact cardinals. Isr. J. Math. 253, 865–886 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11856-022-2385-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11856-022-2385-4

Navigation