Abstract
We investigate the consistency strength of the statement: κ is weakly compact and there is no tree on κ with exactly κ+ many branches. We show that this statement fails strongly (in the sense that there is a sealed tree with exactly κ+ many branches) if there is no inner model with a Woodin cardinal. Moreover, we show that for a weakly compact cardinal κ the nonexistence of a tree on κ with exactly κ+ many branches and, in particular, the Perfect Subtree Property for κ, implies the consistency of ADℝ + DC.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A. Andretta, I. Neeman and J. Steel, The domestic levels of K c are iterable, Israel Journal of Mathematics 125 (2001), 157–201.
A. W. Apter and J. D. Hamkins, Indestructible weakly compact cardinals and the necessity of supercompactness for certain proof schemata, Mathematical Logic Quarterly 47 (2001), 563–571.
P. Erdös, Some set-theoretical properties of graphs, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Revista A. Matematicas y Fysica Teoretica 3 (1942), 363–367.
M. Gitik, R. Schindler and S. Shelah, PCF theory and Woodin cardinals, in Logic Colloquium’ 02, Lecture Notes in Logic, Vol. 27, Association for Symbolic Logic, La Jolla, CA, 2006, pp. 172–205.
J. D. Hamkins, Gap forcing, Israel Journal of Mathematics 125 (2001), 237–252.
T. J. Jech, Set Theory, Springer Monographs in Mathematics, Springer, Berlin, 2003.
T. J. Jech, Trees, Journal of Symbolic Logic 36 (1971), 1–14.
R. Jensen, E. Schimmerling, R. Schindler and J. Steel, Stacking mice, Journal of Symbolic Logic 74 (2009), 315–335.
R. Jensen and J. Steel, K without the measurable, Journal of Symbolic Logic 78 (2013), 708–734.
R. B. Jensen, A New Fine Structure, Handwritten notes, https://www.mathematik.hu-berlin.de/~raesch/org/jensen.html.
P. Larson and G. Sargsyan, Failure of square in ℙmax extensions of Chang models, https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.00322.
I. Neeman and J. Steel, Equiconsistencies at subcompact cardinals, Archive for Mathematical Logic 55 (2016), 207–238.
M. Poór, On the spectra of cardinalities of branches of Kurepa trees, Archive for Mathematical Logic 60 (2021), 927–966.
M. Poór and S. Shelah, Characterizing the spectra of cardinalities of branches of Kurepa trees, Pacific Journal of Mathematics 311 (2021), 423–453.
E. Schimmerling and J. R. Steel, The maximality of the core model, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 351 (1999), 3119–3141.
S. Shelah and R. Jin, Planting Kurepa trees and killing Jech—Kunen trees in a model by using one inaccessible cardinal, Fundamenta Mathematica 141 (1992), 287–296.
J. Silver, The independence of Kurepa’s conjecture and two-cardinal conjectures in model theory, in Axiomatic Set Theory Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, Vol. 13, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1971, pp. 383–390.
D. Sinapova and I. Souldatos, Kurepa trees and spectra of \({{\cal L}_{{\omega _1},\omega}}\), Archive for Mathematical Logic 59 (2020), 939–956.
J. R. Steel, The Core Model Iterability Problem, Lecture Notes in Logic, vol. 8, Springer, Berlin—New York, 1996.
J. R. Steel, An outline of inner model theory, in Handbook of Set Theory, Springer, Dordrecht, 2010, pp. 1595–1684.
S. Unger, Fragility and indestructibility II, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 166 (2015), 1110–1122.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The first-listed author was supported by Austrian Science Fund (FWF) Lise Meitner grant 2650-N35.
The second-listed author was supported by L’ORÉAL Austria, in collaboration with the Austrian UNESCO Commission and in cooperation with the Austrian Academy of Sciences — Fellowship Determinacy and Large Cardinals and Elise Richter grant number V844 of the FWF.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hayut, Y., Müller, S. Perfect subtree property for weakly compact cardinals. Isr. J. Math. 253, 865–886 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11856-022-2385-4
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11856-022-2385-4