Skip to main content
Log in

Topological Veech dichotomy and tessellations of the hyperbolic plane

  • Published:
Israel Journal of Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This article has been updated

Abstract

For every half-translation surface with marked points (M, Σ), we construct an associated tessellation Π(M, Σ) of the Poincaré upper half plane whose tiles have finitely many sides and area at most π. The tessellation Π(M, Σ) is equivariant with respect to the action of PSL(2, ℝ), and invariant with respect to (half-)translation covering. In the case (M, Σ) is the torus ℂ/ℤ2 with a one marked point, Π(ℂ/ℤ2, {0}) coincides with the iso-Delaunay tessellation introduced by Veech [25] (see also [1, 2]) as both tessellations give the Farey tessellation. As application, we obtain a bound on the volume of the corresponding Teichmüller curve in the case (M, Σ) is a Veech surface (lattice surface). Under the assumption that (M, Σ) satisfies the topological Veech dichotomy, there is a natural graph \({\cal G}\) underlying Π(M, Σ) on which the Veech group Γ acts by automorphisms. We show that \({\cal G}\) has infinite diameter and is Gromov hyperbolic. Furthermore, the quotient \(\overline {\cal G}:= {\cal G}/\Gamma \) is a finite graph if and only if (M, Σ) is actually a Veech surface, in which case we provide an algorithm to determine the graph \(\overline {\cal G} \) explicitly. This algorithm also allows one to get a generating family and a “coarse” fundamental domain of the Veech group Γ.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 30 July 2022

    There is a typographical error on author name during initial upload.

References

  1. J. Bowman, Flat structures and Complex structures in Teichmüller theory, Ph.D. Thesis, Cornell University, 2009.

  2. J. Bowman, Teichmüller geodesics, Delaunay triangulations, and Veech groups, in Teichmüller Theory and Moduli Problem, Ramanujan Mathematical Society Lecture Notes Series, Vol. 10, Ramanujan Mathematical Society, Mysore, 2010, pp. 113–129.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Y. Cheung, P. Hubert and H. Masur, Topological dichotomy and strict ergodicity for translation surfaces, Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems 28 (2008), 1729–1748.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. U. Hamenstädt, Stability of quasi-geodesics in Teichmüller space, Geometriae Dedicata 146 (2010), 101–116.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. P. Hubert and E. Lanneau, Veech groups without parabolic elements, Duke Mathematical Journal 133 (2006), 335–346.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. P. Hubert and T. Schmidt, Invariants of translation surfaces, Université de Grenoble. Annales de l’Institut Fourier 51 (2001), 461–495.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. P. Hubert and T. Schmidt, Infinitely generated Veech groups, Duke Mathematical Journal 123 (2004), 49–69.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. R. Kenyon and J. Smillie, Billiards on rational-angled triangles, Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici 75 (2000), 65–108.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. E. Klarreich, The boundary at infinity of the curve complex and the relative Teichmüller space, https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.10339.

  10. E. Lanneau, Parity of the spin structure defined by a quadratic differential, Geomemtry & Topology 8 (2004), 511–538.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. E. Lanneau and D.-M. Nguyen, Complete periodicity of Prym eigenforms, Annales Scientifiques de l’École Normale Supérieure 49:1 (2016), 87–130.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. H. Masur and Y. Minsky, Geometry of the curve complex I: Hyperbolicity, Inventiones Mathematicae 138 (1999), 103–149.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. H. Masur and S. Schleimer, The geometry of the disk complex, Journal of the American Mathematical Society 26 (2013), 1–62.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. H. Masur and S. Tabachnikov, Rational billiards and fiat structures,in Handbook of Dynamical Systems. Vol. 1A, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2002, pp. 1015–1089.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. C. McMullen, Billiards and Teichmuller curves on Hilbert modular surfaces, Journal of the American Mathematical Society 16 (2003), 857–885.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. C. McMullen, Teichmüller geodesics of infinite complexity, Acta Mathematica 191 (2003), 191–223.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. M. Möller, Periodic points on Veech surfaces and the Mordell—Weil group over a Teichmueller curve, Inventiones Mathematicae 165 (2006), 633–649.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. L. Mosher, Traintrack expansions of measured foliations, preprint.

  19. R. Mukamel, Fundamental domains and generators for lattice Veech groups, Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici 92 (2017), 57–83.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. M. Rees, An alternative approach to the ergodic theory of measured foliations on surfaces, Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems 1 (1981), 461–488.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. G. Schmithösen, An algorithm for finding the Veech group of an origami, Experimental Mathematics 13 (2004), 459–472.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. J. Smillie, The dynamics of billiards flows in rational polygons, in Dynamical Systems, Ergodic Theory and Applications, Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 100, Springer, Berlin—Heidelberg, 2000, pp. 360–382.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. J. Smillie and B. Weiss, Finiteness results for flat surfaces: large cusps and short geodesics, Commetarii Mathematici Helvetici 85 (2010), 313–336.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. J. Smillie and B. Weiss, Characterizations of lattice surfaces, Inventiones Mathematicae 180 (2010), 535–557.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. W. A. Veech, Bicuspid F-structure and Hecke groups, Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 103 (2011), 710–745.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Ya. Vorobets, Periodic geodesics on generic translation surfaces, in Algebraic and Topological Dynamics, Contemporary Mathematics, Vol. 385, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2005, pp. 205–258.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. G. Weitze-Schmithüsen, Deficiency of being a congruence group of for Veech groups of origamis, International Mathematics Research Notices 2015 (2015), 1613–1637.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. A. Zorich, Flat surfaces,in Frontiers in Number Theory, Physics, and Geometry. I, Springer, Berlin, 2006, pp. 437–583.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Duc-Manh Nguyen.

Additional information

To the memory of William A. Veech

The author thanks the VIASM Hanoi for its hospitality during the preparation of this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nguyen, DM. Topological Veech dichotomy and tessellations of the hyperbolic plane. Isr. J. Math. 249, 577–616 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11856-022-2320-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11856-022-2320-8

Navigation