Advertisement

Israel Journal of Mathematics

, Volume 224, Issue 1, pp 189–230 | Cite as

Keisler’s order has infinitely many classes

  • Maryanthe Malliaris
  • Saharon Shelah
Article
  • 23 Downloads

Abstract

We prove, in ZFC, that there is an infinite strictly descending chain of classes of theories in Keisler’s order. Thus Keisler’s order is infinite and not a well order. Moreover, this chain occurs within the simple unstable theories, considered model-theoretically tame. Keisler’s order is a central notion of the model theory of the 60s and 70s which compares first-order theories, and implicitly ultrafilters, according to saturation of ultrapowers. Prior to this paper, it was long thought to have finitely many classes, linearly ordered. The model-theoretic complexity we find is witnessed by a very natural class of theories, the n-free k-hypergraphs studied by Hrushovski. This complexity reflects the difficulty of amalgamation and appears orthogonal to forking.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    G. Cherlin and E. Hrushovski, Finite Structures with Few Types, Annals of Mathematics Studies, Vol. 152, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2003.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    H.-D. Donder, Regularity of ultrafilters and the core model, Israel Journal of Mathematics 63 (1988), 289–322.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    R. Engelking and M. Karłowicz, Some theorems of set theory and their topological consequences, Fundamenta Mathematicae 57 (1965), 275–285.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    P. Erdős, A. Hajnal, A.Máté and R. Rado, Combinatorial set Theory: Partition Relations for Cardinals, Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, Vol. 106, North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1984.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    G. Fichtenholz and L. Kantorovitch, Sur les opérations linéaires dans l’espace des fonctions bornées, Studia Mathematica 5 (1934), 69–98.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    F. Hausdorff, Über zwei sätze von G. Fichtenholz und L. Kantorovitch, Studia Mathematica 6 (1936), 18–19.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    E. Hrushovski, Pseudo-finite fields and related structures, in Model Theory and Applications, Quaderni di Matematica, Vol. 11, Aracne, Rome, 2002, pp. 151–212.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    E. Hrushovski, Stable group theory and approximate subgroups, Journal of the American Mathematical Society 25 (2012), 189–243.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    H. J. Keisler, Good ideals in fields of sets, Annals of Mathematics 79 (1964), 338–359.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    H. J. Keisler, Ultraproducts which are not saturated, Journal of Symbolic Logic 32 (1967), 23–46.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    S. Kochen, Ultraproducts in the theory of models, Annals of Mathematics 74 (1961), 221–261.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    P. Komjáth and S. Shelah, Two consistency results on set mappings, Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (2000), 333–338.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    K. Kunen, Ultrafilters and independent sets, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 172 (1972), 299–306.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    A. Macintyre, A history of interactions between logic and number theory, 2003 Arizona Winter School manuscript (2003), swc.math.arizona.edu/aws/2003/03MacintyreNotes.pdf.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    M. Malliaris and S. Shelah, A dividing line within simple unstable theories, Advances in Mathematics 249 (2013), 250–288.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    M. Malliaris and S. Shelah, General topology meets model theory, on p and t, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110 (2013), 13300–13305.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    M. Malliaris and S. Shelah, Constructing regular ultrafilters from a model-theoretic point of view, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 367 (2015), 8139–8173.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    M. Malliaris and S. Shelah, Saturating the random graph with an independent family of small range, in Logic Without Borders, DeGruyter, Berlin–Boston–Munich, 2015.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    M. Malliaris and S. Shelah, Cofinality spectrum theorems in model theory, set theory, and general topology, Journal of the American Mathematical Society 29 (2016), 237–297.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    M. Malliaris and S. Shelah, Existence of optimal ultrafilters and the fundamental complexity of simple theories, Advances in Mathematics 290 (2016), 614–681.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    M. E. Malliaris, Persistence and regularity in unstable model theory, ProQuest LLC, Ann Arbor, MI, 2009, Thesis (Ph.D.)–University of California, Berkeley.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    M. E. Malliaris, Realization of ϕ-types and Keisler’s order, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 157 (2009), 220–224.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    M. E. Malliaris, Independence, order, and the interaction of ultrafilters and theories, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 163 (2012), 1580–1595.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    S. Mohsenipour and S. Shelah, Set mappings on 4-tuples, paper 1072. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, Accepted.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    J. T. Moore, Model theory and the cardinal numbers p and t, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110 (2013), 13238–13239.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    M. Morley, 1968 Mathscinet review MR0218224 of Keisler [10].Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    S. Shelah, Classification Theory and the Number of Nonisomorphic Models, Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, Vol. 92, North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1990.Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    S. Shelah, On what I do not understand (and have something to say), model theory, Mathematica Japonica 51 (2000), 329–377.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    W. Sierpiński, Cardinal and Ordinal Numbers, Monografie Matematyczne, Vol. 34, Państowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warsaw, 1965.zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Hebrew University of Jerusalem 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsUniversity of ChicagoChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Einstein Institute of Mathematics, Edmond J. Safra CampusThe Hebrew University of JerusalemGivat Ram, JerusalemIsrael
  3. 3.Department of Mathematics, Hill Center - Busch Campus, RutgersThe State University of New JerseyPiscatawayUSA

Personalised recommendations