Abstract
The well-known Hammersley–Clifford Theorem states (under certain conditions) that any Markov random field is a Gibbs state for a nearest neighbor interaction. In this paper we study Markov random fields for which the proof of the Hammersley–Clifford Theorem does not apply. Following Petersen and Schmidt we utilize the formalism of cocycles for the homoclinic equivalence relation and introduce “Markov cocycles”, reparametrizations of Markov specifications. The main part of this paper exploits this to deduce the conclusion of the Hammersley–Clifford Theorem for a family of Markov random fields which are outside the theorem’s purview where the underlying graph is Z d . This family includes all Markov random fields whose support is the d-dimensional “3-colored chessboard”. On the other extreme, we construct a family of shift-invariant Markov random fields which are not given by any finite range shift-invariant interaction.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
M. B. Averincev, Description of Markov random fields by means of Gibbs conditional probabilities, Teor. Verojatnost. i Primenen. 17 (1972), 21–35.
M. Boyle, R. Pavlov and M. Schraudner, Multidimensional sofic shifts without separation and their factors, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 362 (2010), 4617–4653.
G. R. Brightwell and P. Winkler, Gibbs measures and dismantlable graphs, J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 78 (2000), 141–166.
R. Burton and J. E. Steif, Non–uniqueness of measures of maximal entropy for subshifts of finite type, Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 14 (1994), 213–235.
N. Chandgotia, Markov random fields and measures with nearest neighbour potentials, MSc Thesis, Mathematics Department, The University of British Columbia (2011). avaliable at: open.library.ubc.ca/cIRcle/collections/ubctheses/24/items/1.0072112.
N. Chandgotia, Generalisation of the Hammersley–Clifford theorem on bipartite graphs, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., to appear. http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.1849.
N. Chandgotia, G. Han, B. Marcus, T. Meyerovitch and R. Pavlov, One–dimensional Markov random fields, Markov chains and topological Markov fields, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 142 (2014), 227–242.
S. Dachian and B. S. Nahapetian, Description of random fields by means of one–point conditional distributions and some applications, Markov Process. Related Fields 7 (2001), 193–214.
R. L. Dobrušin, Description of a random field by means of conditional probabilities and conditions for its regularity, Teor. Verojatnost. i Primenen 13 (1968), 201–229.
N. Elkies, G. Kuperberg, M. Larsen and J. Propp, Alternating–sign matrices and domino tilings. I, J. Algebraic Combin. 1 (1992), 111–132.
D. Galvin, On homomorphisms from the Hamming cube to Z, Israel J. Math. 138 (2003), 189–213.
D. Geiger, C. Meek and B. Sturmfels, On the toric algebra of graphical models, Ann. Statist. 34 (2006), 1463–1492.
H.–O. Georgii, Gibbs Measures and Phase Transitions, de Gruyter Studies in Mathematics, Vol. 9, Walter de Gruyter & Co., Berlin, 1988.
J. M. Hammersley and P. Clifford, Markov fields on finite graphs and lattices, 1968. avaliabel at: http://www.statslab.cam.ac.uk/~grg/books/hammfest/hamm–cliff.pdf.
O. E. Lanford, III and D. Ruelle, Observables at infinity and states with short range correlations in statistical mechanics, Comm. Math. Phys. 13 (1969), 194–215.
S. L. Lauritzen, Graphical Models, Vol. 17, Oxford Statistical Science Series, Oxford Science Publications, The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York, 1996.
T. Meyerovitch, Gibbs and equilibrium measures for some families of subshifts, Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 33 (2013), 934–953.
J. Moussouris, Gibbs and Markov random systems with constraints, J. Statist. Phys. 10 (1974), 11–33.
L. Onsager, Crystal statistics. I. A two–dimensional model with an order–disorder transition, Phys. Rev. (2) 65 (1944), 117–149.
K. Petersen and K. Schmidt, Symmetric Gibbs measures, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 349 (1997), 2775–2811.
C. J. Preston, Gibbs States on Countable Sets, Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, No. 68, Cambridge University Press, London–New York, 1974
A. Quas and A. A. Şahin, Entropy gaps and locally maximal entropy in Zd subshifts, Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 23 (2003), 1227–1245.
D. Ruelle, Thermodynamic Formalism, second edition, Cambridge Mathematical Library, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004.
K. Schmidt, The cohomology of higher–dimensional shifts of finite type, Pacific J. Math. 170 (1995), 237–269.
K. Schmidt, Invariant cocycles, random tilings and the super–K and strong Markov properties, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 349 (1997), 2813–2825.
K. Schmidt, Tilings, fundamental cocycles and fundamental groups of symbolic Zd_actions, Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 18 (1998), 1473–1525.
S. Sherman, Markov random fields and Gibbs random fields, Israel J. Math. 14 (1973), 92–103.
F. Spitzer, Markov random fields and Gibbs ensembles, Amer.Math. Monthly 78 (1971), 142–154.
P. Walters, An Introduction to Ergodic Theory, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Vol. 79, Springer–Verlag, New York–Berlin, 1982.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chandgotia, N., Meyerovitch, T. Markov random fields, Markov cocycles and the 3-colored chessboard. Isr. J. Math. 215, 909–964 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11856-016-1398-2
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11856-016-1398-2