Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On tall cardinals and some related generalizations

  • Published:
Israel Journal of Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We continue the study of tall cardinals and related notions begun by Hamkins in 2009 and answer three of his questions posed in that paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Apter, Failures of SCH and level by level equivalence, Archive for Mathematical Logic 45 (2006), 831–838.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. A. Apter, Strong compactness and a global version of a theorem of Ben-David and Magidor, Mathematical Logic Quarterly 46 (2000), 453–459.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Apter, The least strongly compact can be the least strong and indestructible, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 144 (2006), 33–42.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. A. Apter and J. Cummings, Identity crises and strong compactness II: Strong cardinals, Archive for Mathematical Logic 40 (2001), 25–38.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Gitik, Changing cofinalities and the nonstationary ideal, Israel Journal of Mathematics 56 (1986), 280–314.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Gitik, On the Mitchell and Rudin-Kiesler ordering of ultrafilters, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 39 (1988), 175–197.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. M. Gitik, Prikry-type forcings, in Handbook of Set Theory, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, 2010, pp. 1351–1447.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. M. Gitik, The negation of the singular cardinal hypothesis from o(κ) = κ ++, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 43 (1989), 209–234.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Gitik and S. Shelah, On certain indestructibility of strong cardinals and a question of Hajnal, Archive for Mathematical Logic 28 (1989), 35–42.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. J. D. Hamkins, Extensions with the approximation and cover properties have no new large cardinals, Fundamenta Mathematicae 180 (2003), 257–277.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. J. D. Hamkins, Tall cardinals, Mathematical Logic Quarterly 55 (2009), 68–86.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. J. D. Hamkins and W. H. Woodin, Small forcing creates neither strong nor Woodin cardinals, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 128 (2000), 3025–3029.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. T. Jech, Set Theory, The Third Millennium Edition, Revised and Expanded, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, 2003.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. A. Lévy and R. Solovay, Measurable cardinals and the continuum hypothesis, Israel Journal of Mathematics 5 (1967), 234–248.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. M. Magidor, Changing cofinality of cardinals, Fundamenta Mathematicae 99 (1978), 61–71.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. M. Magidor, How large is the first strongly compact cardinal? or A study on identity crises, Annals of Mathematical Logic 10 (1976), 33–57.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. W. Mitchell, Hypermeasurable cardinals, in Logic Colloquium’ 78, Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, Vol. 97, North-Holland, Amsterdam-New York, 1979, pp. 303–316.

    Google Scholar 

  18. W. Mitchell, Sets constructible from sequences of ultrafilters, Journal of Symbolic Logic 39 (1974), 57–66.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. W. Mitchell, The covering lemma, in Handbook of Set Theory, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, 2010, pp. 1497–1594.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. R. Schindler, The core model for almost linear iterations, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 116 (2002), 207–274.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. R. Solovay, W. Reinhardt and A. Kanamori, Strong axioms of infinity and elementary embeddings, Annals of Mathematical Logic 13 (1978), 73–116.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. M. Zeman, Inner Models and Large Cardinals, de Gruyter Series in Logic and its Applications, Vol. 5, Walter de Gruyter and Co., Berlin, 2002.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mathematics, Baruch College of CUNY, New York, NY, 10010, USA

    Arthur W. Apter

  2. Mathematics, The CUNY Graduate Center, 365 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, USA

    Arthur W. Apter

  3. Department of Mathematics, Tel Aviv University, 69978, Tel Aviv, Israel

    Moti Gitik

Authors
  1. Arthur W. Apter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Moti Gitik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arthur W. Apter.

Additional information

The first author’s research was partially supported by PSC-CUNY grants.

The second author’s research was partially supported by ISF Grant 234/08.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Apter, A.W., Gitik, M. On tall cardinals and some related generalizations. Isr. J. Math. 202, 343–373 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11856-014-1073-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11856-014-1073-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation