Skip to main content
Log in

Minimal surface area position of a convex body is not always an M-position

  • Published:
Israel Journal of Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Milman proved that there exists an absolute constant C > 0 such that, for every convex body K in ℝn, there exists a linear image TK of K with volume 1, such that |TK + D n |1/nC, where D n is the Euclidean ball of volume 1. TK is then said to be in M-position. Giannopoulos and Milman asked if every convex body that has minimal surface area among all its affine images of volume 1 is also in M-position. We prove that the answer to this question is negative, even in the 1-unconditional case.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Bourgain, B. Klartag and V. D. Milman, Symmetrization and isotropic constants of convex bodies, in Geometric Aspects of Functional Analysis, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 1850, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2004, pp. 101–116.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. J. Bourgain and V. D. Milman, New volume ratio properties for convex symmetric bodies ind, Inventiones Mathematicae 88 (1987), 319–340.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Giannopoulos and V. D. Milman, Extremal problems and isotropic positions of convex bodies, Israel Journal of Mathematics 117 (2000), 29–60.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. A. Giannopoulos and V. D. Milman, Asymptotic Convex Geometry: a short overview, in Different Faces of Geometry (S. K. Donaldson, Ya. Eliashberg and M. Gromov, eds.) International Mathematical Series, Vol. 3, Kluwer/Plenum Publishers, Dordrecht, 2004, pp. 87–162.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. B. Klartag, An isomorphic version of the slicing problem, Journal of Functional Analysis 218 (2005), 372–394.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. E. Lutwak, Selected affine isoperimetric inequalities, in Handbook of Convex Geometry (P. M. Gruber and J. M. Wills, eds.), Vol. A, Elsevier Science Publishers, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1993, pp. 151–176.

    Google Scholar 

  7. V. D. Milman, Isomorphic symmetrization and geometric inequalities, in Geometric Aspects of Functional Analysis (1986–87), Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 1317, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1988, pp. 107–131.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. V. D. Milman and A. Pajor, Isotropic position and inertia ellipsoids and zonoids of the unit ball of a normed n-dimensional space, in Geometric Aspects of Functional Analysis (1987–88), Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 1376, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1989, pp. 64–104.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. C. M. Petty, Surface area of a convex body under affine transformations, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 12 (1961), 824–828.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. C. A. Rogers and G. C. Shephard, The difference body of a convex body, Archiv der Mathematik 8 (1957), 220–233.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. R. Schneider, Convex Bodies: The Brunn-Minkowski Theory, Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, Vol. 44, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christos Saroglou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saroglou, C. Minimal surface area position of a convex body is not always an M-position. Isr. J. Math. 195, 631–645 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11856-012-0111-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11856-012-0111-3

Keywords

Navigation