Journal d'Analyse Mathématique

, Volume 137, Issue 2, pp 529–558 | Cite as

On the time slicing approximation of Feynman path integrals for non-smooth potentials

  • Fabio NicolaEmail author


We consider the time slicing approximations of Feynman path integrals, constructed via piecewice classical paths. A detailed study of the convergence in the norm operator topology, in the space B(L2(ℝd)) of bounded operators on L2, and even in finer operator topologies, was carried on by D. Fujiwara in the case of smooth potentials with an at most quadratic growth. In the present paper we show that the result about the convergence in B(L2(ℝd)) remains valid if the potential is only assumed to have second space derivatives in the Sobolev space Hd+1(ℝd) (locally and uniformly), uniformly in time. The proof is non-perturbative in nature, but relies on a precise short time analysis of the Hamiltonian flow at this Sobolev regularity and on the continuity in L2 of certain oscillatory integral operators with non-smooth phase and amplitude.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    S. Albeverio, R. Höegh-Krohn, and S. Mazzucchi, Mathematical Theory of Feynman Path Integrals. An Introduction, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 523, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2008.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    G. Arsu, On Kato–Sobolev type spaces, arXiv:1209.6465.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    A. Boulkhemair, Estimations L 2 precisées pour des integrales oscillantes, Comm. Partial Differential Equations 22 (1997), 165–184.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    D. Campbell, S. Hencl, and F. Konopecký, The weak inverse mapping theorem, Z. Anal. Anwend 34 (2015), 321–342.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Y. Choquet-Bruhat and C. DeWitt-Morette, Analysis, Manifolds and Physics, Part 1: Basics, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1982.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    E. Cordero, K. Gröchenig, F. Nicola, and L. Rodino, Generalized metaplectic operators and the Schrödinger equation with a potential in the Sjöstrand class, J. Math. Phys. 55 (2014), art. no. 081506.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    E. Cordero, F. Nicola, and L. Rodino, Wave packet analysis of Schrödinger equations in analytic function spaces, Adv. Math. 278 (2015), 182–209.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    E. Cordero, F. Nicola, and L. Rodino, Schrödinger equation with rough Hamiltonians, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. A 35 (2015), 4805–4821.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    R. Feynman, Space-time approach to non-relativistic Quantum Mechanics, Rev. Modern Phys. 20 (1948), 367–387.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    R. Feynman and A. R. Hibbs, QuantumMechanics and Path Integrals, Dover,Mineola, NY, 2010.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    D. Fujiwara, A construction of the fundamental solution for the Schrödinger equation, J. Anal. Math. 35 (1979), 41–96.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    D. Fujiwara, Remarks on convergence of some Feynman path integrals, Duke Math. J. 47 (1980), 559–600.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    D. Fujiwara, A remark on Taniguchi-Kumanogo theorem for product of Fourier integral operators, in Pseudo-differential Operators, Proc. Oberwolfach 1986, Lecture Notes in Math., Vol. 1256, Berlin, Springer, 1987, pp. 135–153.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    D. Fujiwara, The stationary phase method with an estimate of the remainder term on a space of large dimension, Nagoya Math. J. 124 (1991), 61–97.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    D. Fujiwara, Some Feynman path integrals as oscillatory integrals over a Sobolev manifold, in Functional Analysis and Related Topics, 1991 (Kyoto), Lecture Notes in Math., Vol. 1540, Springer, Berlin, 1993, pp. 39–53Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    D. Fujiwara, An integration by parts formula for Feynman path integrals, J. Math. Soc. Japan 65 (2013), 1273–1318.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    D. Fujiwara and N. Kumano-go, Smooth functional derivatives in Feynman path integrals by time slicing approximation, Bull. Sci. Math. 129 (2005), 57–79.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    D. Fujiwara and N. Kumano-go, The second term of the semi-classical asymptotic expansion for Feynman path integrals with integrand of polynomial growth, J. Math. Soc. Japan 58 (2006), 837–867.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    D. Fujiwara and T. Tsuchida, The time slicing approximation of the fundamental solution for the Schrödinger equation with electromagnetic fields, J. Math. Soc. Japan 49 (1997), 299–327.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    W. Ichinose, Convergence of the Feynman path integral in the weighted Sobolev spaces and the representation of correlation functions, J. Math. Soc. Japan 55 (2003), 957–983.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    T. Ichinose and H. Tamura, Results on convergence in norm of exponential product formulas and pointwise of the corresponding integral kernels, in Modern Analysis and Applications, Operator Theory: Advances and Applications, Vol. 190, Birkhäuser, Basel, 2009, pp. 315–327.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    H. Ichi, T. Kappeler, and P. Topalov, On the regularity of the composition of diffeomorphisms, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 226 (2013), 1–72.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    T. Kato, The Cauchy problem for quasi-linear symmetric hyperbolic systems, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 58 (1975), 181–205.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    H. Kitada, On a construction of the fundamental solution for Schrödinger equations, Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo Sec. IA 27 (1980), 193–226.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    H. Kitada and H. Kumano-go, A family of Fourier integral operators and the fundamental solution for a Schrödinger equation, Osaka J. Math. 18 (1981), 291–360.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    H. Koch and D. Tataru, Dispersive estimates for principally normal pseudodifferential operators, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 58 (2004), 217–284.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    N. Kumano-go, A construction of the fundamental solution for Schrödinger equations, J. Math. Sci. Univ. Tokyo 2 (1995), 441–498.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    N. Kumano-go, Feynman path integrals as analysis on path space by time slicing approximation, Bull. Sci. Math. 128 (2004), 197–251.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    N. Kumano-go, Phase space Feynman path integrals with smooth functional derivatives by time slicing approximation, Bull. Sci. Math. 135 (2011), 936–987.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    NKumano go and D. Fujiwara, Phase spaceFeynman path integrals via piecewise bicharacteristic paths and their semiclassical approximations, Bull. Sci. Math. 132 (2008), 313–357.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    N. Kumano-go and D. Fujiwara, Feynman path integrals and semiclassical approximation, in Algebraic Analysis and the Exact WKB Analysis for Systems of Differential Equations, RIMS Kôkyôroku Bessatsu B5, Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Kyoto, 2008, pp. 241–263.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    J. Marzuola, J. Metcalfe, and D. Tataru, Wave packet parametrices for evolutions governed by PDO’s with rough symbols, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 136 (2008), 597–604.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    S. Mazzucchi, Mathematical Feynman Path Integrals and Their Applications, World Scientific, Hackensack, NJ, 2009.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    F. Nicola, Convergence in Lp for Feynman path integrals, Adv. Math. 294 (2016), 384–409.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    L. Nirenberg, On elliptic partial differential equations, Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci., Ser. (1959), no. 13, 115–162.Google Scholar
  36. [36]
    M. Reed and B. Simon, Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics Vol. II: Fourier Analysis, Self-Adjointness, Academic Press, New York, 1975.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    M. Ruzhansky and M. Sugimoto, Global L2 boundedness theorems for a class of Fourier integral operators, Comm. Partial Differential Equations 31 (2006), 547–569.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    L.S. Schulman, Techniques and Applications ofPath Integration,Monographs and Texts in Physics and Astronomy, Dover, Mineola, NY, 2005.Google Scholar
  39. [39]
    D. Tataru, Phase space transforms and microlocal analysis. in Phase Space Analysis of Partial Differential Equations. Vol. II, Pubbl. Cent. Ric. Mat. Ennio Giorgi, Scuola Norm. Sup., Pisa, 2004, pp. 505–524.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. [40]
    T. Tsuchida, Remarks on Fujiwara’s stationary phase method on a space of large dimension with a phase function involving electromagnetic fields, Nagoya Math. J. 136 (1994), 157–189.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. [41]
    K. Yajima, Schrödinger evolution equations with magnetic fields, J. Anal. Math. 56 (1991), 29–76.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Hebrew University of Jerusalem 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di Scienze MatematichePolitecnico di TorinoTorinoItaly

Personalised recommendations