Journal d'Analyse Mathématique

, Volume 132, Issue 1, pp 133–156 | Cite as

Differential analysis of polarity: Polar Hamilton-Jacobi, conservation laws, and Monge Ampère equations

  • Shiri Artstein-Avidan
  • Yanir A. RubinsteinEmail author


We develop a differential theory for the polarity transform parallel to that of the Legendre transform, which is applicable when the functions studied are “geometric convex”, namely, convex, non-negative, and vanish at the origin. This analysis establishes basic tools for dealing with this duality transform, such as the polar subdifferential map, and variational formulas. Another crucial step is identifying a new, non-trivial, sub-class of C 2 functions preserved under this transform. This analysis leads to a new method for solving many new first order equations reminiscent of Hamilton–Jacobi and conservation law equations, as well as some second order equations of Monge–Ampère type. This article develops the theory of strong solutions for these equations which, due to the nonlinear nature of the polarity transform, is considerably more delicate than its counterparts involving the Legendre transform. As one application, we introduce a polar form of the homogeneous Monge–Ampère equation that gives a dynamical meaning to a new method of interpolating between convex functions and bodies. A number of other applications, e.g., to optimal transport and affine differential geometry are considered in sequels.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    S. Artstein-Avidan and V. Milman, Hidden structures in the class of convex functions and a new duality transform, J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 13 (2011), 975–1004.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    L. C. Evans, Partial Differential Equations, Second Edition, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2010.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    W. Fenchel, On conjugate convex functions, Canad. J. Math. 1 (1949), 73–77.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    F. R. Harvey and H. B. Lawson Jr., Dirichlet duality and the nonlinear Dirichlet problem, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 62 (2009), 396–443.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    D. Hug, Curvature relations and affine surface area for a general convex body and its polar, Results Math. 29 (1996), 233–248.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    H.-Y. Jian and X.-J. Wang, Bernstein theorem and regularity for a class of Monge–Ampére equations, J. Differential Geom. 93 (2013), 431–469.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    S. Mandelbrojt, Sur les fonctions convexes, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 209 (1939), 977–978.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    J. Rauch and B. A. Taylor, The Dirichlet problem for the multidimensional Monge-Ampère equation, Rocky Mountain J. Math. 7 (1977), 345–364.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    R. T. Rockafellar, Convex Analysis, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1970.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Y. A. Rubinstein, Geometric quantization and dynamical constructions on the space of Kähler metrics, Ph. D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2008.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Y. A. Rubinstein and S. Zelditch, The Cauchy problem for the homogeneous Monge–Ampère equation, II. Legendre transform, Adv. Math. 228 (2011), 2989–3025.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Y. A. Rubinstein and S. Zelditch, The Cauchy problem for the homogeneous Monge–Ampère equation, III. Lifespan, J. Reine Agnew Math. 214 (2017), 105–143.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    S. Semmes, Interpolation of Banach spaces, differential geometry and differential equations, Rev. Mat. Iberoamericana 4 (1988), 155–176.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Hebrew University Magnes Press 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of MathematicsTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations