Journal of Coastal Conservation

, Volume 21, Issue 4, pp 453–471 | Cite as

Assessing storm surge risk under future sea-level rise scenarios: a case study in the North Adriatic coast

  • J. Rizzi
  • S. Torresan
  • A. Zabeo
  • A. Critto
  • A. Tosoni
  • A. Tomasin
  • A. Marcomini


Low-lying coastal areas are often prone to storm surge flooding that can render severe damages to properties, destruction of habitats, threat to human safety and the environment. The impacts of coastal flooding are also expected to increase in the future as a consequence of global climate change and sea-level rise. This paper presents a comprehensive assessment of the potential risks raised by storm surge and sea-level rise on multiple coastal targets (i.e., population, buildings, infrastructures, agriculture, natural and semi-natural environments and cultural heritage) in the Northern Adriatic coast in Italy. Through the assessment of hazard, exposure, vulnerability and risk, a Regional Risk Assessment (RRA) methodology allowed identifying and prioritizing hot-spot risk areas and targets requiring particular attention for the definition of adaptation strategies. Hazard scenarios were based on the analysis of tide gauge data (elaborated with the Joint Probability Method) and of different sea-level rise projections for the year 2100. Geographical-information analysis was then used to characterize vulnerability patterns of exposed natural and human systems and to make a spatial ranking of risks. Maps produced for the worst scenario showed that beaches are the target at higher risk (with more than 90% of the surface in the higher relative risk class) due to the low elevation and high proximity to the coastline. Also cultural heritage (i.e., villas, historical buildings and roads) and wetlands are highly threatened by storm surge flooding. The relative risks will be lower (i.e., between 25% and 40% of their surface/length in the higher relative risk class) for most of the other receptors (i.e., local roads, railways, natural and semi-natural environments and agricultural areas), including population and buildings that are mostly classified in lower risk classes. The overall results of the assessment, including maps and risk metrics, can be useful to rise the attention of coastal managers about the need to adapt to climate change, developing climate-proof policies and programs for the sustainable management of coastal zones.


Storm surge Climate change Sea-level rise Regional risk assessment Joint probability method 



This paper is a result of the CLIMDAT project, funded by the Institute for Environmental Protection and Research (ISPRA) Venice. Additional funding came from the Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research and the Italian Ministry of Environment, Land and Sea under the GEMINA project. The authors would like to thank the ISPRA Venice, the CMCC and the University Ca′ Foscari Venice staff who offered their contribution, particularly Marco Cordella and Franco Crosato of ISPRA for the support in the preparation of the dataset of tide gauge stations and Elisa Furlan of University Ca′ Foscari Venice for the support in GIS implementation.


  1. Antonioli F, Silenzi S (2007) Variazioni relative del livello del mare e vulnerabilità delle pianure costiere italiane. Quaderni SGI 2Google Scholar
  2. Balbi S, Giupponi C, Gain A, Mojtahed V, Gallina V, Torresan S, Marcomini A (2010) A conceptual framework for comprehensive assessment of risk prevention measures: the Kulturisk framework (KR-FWK). Available at SSRN: or doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2184193
  3. Bondesan A, Castiglioni GB, Elmi C, Gabbianelli G, Marocco R, Pirazzoli PA, Tomasin A (1995) Coastal areas at risk from storm surges and sea-level rise in northeastern Italy. J Coast Res 11(4):1354–1379Google Scholar
  4. Carbognin L, Teatini P, Tomasin A, Tosi L (2009) Global change and relative sea level rise at Venice: what impact in term of flooding. Clim Dyn. doi: 10.1007/s00382-009-0617-5 Google Scholar
  5. Ciscar JC, Iglesias A, Feyen L, Szabó L, Van Regemorter D, Amelung B, Nicholls R, Watkiss P, Christensen OB, Dankers R, Garrote L, Goodess CM, Hunt A, Moreno A, Richards J, Soria A (2011) Physical and economic consequences of climate change in Europe. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:2678–2683. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1011612108 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crowell M (2010) An estimate of the U.S. population living in 100-year coastal flood hazard areas. J Coast Res 26(2):201–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crozier MJ, Glade T (2005) Landslide hazard and risk: issues, concepts and approach. In: Glade T, Anderson M, Crozier MJ (eds) Landslide hazard and risk. Wiley, Chichester, pp 1–40Google Scholar
  8. de Moel H, van Alphen J, Aerts JCJH (2009) Flood maps in Europe – methods, availability and use. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 9(2):289–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Devoy RJN (2008) Coastal vulnerability and the implications of sea-level rise for Ireland. J Coast Res 24(2):325–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. EC (2007) Directive 2007/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 “on the assessment and management of flood risks”Google Scholar
  11. EEA (2011) Disasters in Europe: more frequent and causing more damage.
  12. Ferla M, Cordella M, Michielli L, Rusconi A (2007) Long term variations on sea level and tidal regime in the lagoon of Venice. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 75(1–2):214–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fontolan G (2001) Risk of flooding: forecast and prevention plan. Province of Venice, Soil and Civil Defence Unit, Trieste, p 92Google Scholar
  14. Ford ES, Mokdad AH, Link MW, Garvin WS, McGuire LC, Jiles RB, Balluz LS (2006) Chronic diseases in health emergencies: in the eye of the hurricane. Prev Chronic Dis 3(2):1–7Google Scholar
  15. French PW (2001) Coastal defences: processes, problems & solutions, Florence, KY, USA, Routledge. Available at:
  16. Gambolati G, Teatini P (2002) GIS simulations of the inundation risk in the coastal lowlands of the northern Adriatic Sea. Math Comput Model 35:963–972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gommes R, du Guerny J, Nachtergaele F, Brinkman R (1997) Potential impacts of sea-level rise on populations and agriculture. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  18. Gonella M, Teatini P, Tomasi L, Gambolati G (1998) Flood risk analysis in the upper Adriatic Sea due to storm surge, tide, waves, and natural and anthropic land subsidence. In: Gambolati G (ed) CENAS-coastline evolution of the upper Adriatic Sea due to sea level rise and natural and anthropogenic land subsidence. Kluver academic Publisher Dordrecht, pp 313–324Google Scholar
  19. Granger K (2003) Quantifying storm tide risk in cairns. Nat Hazards 30:165–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grünthal G, Thieken AH, Schwarz J, Radtke KS, Smolka A, Merz B (2006) Comparative risk assessments for the city of cologne—storms, floods, earthquakes. Nat Hazards 38:21–44. doi: 10.1007/s11069-005-8598-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hall JW, Dawson RJ, Sayers PB, Rosu C, Chatterton JB, Deakin R (2003) A methodology for national-scale flood risk assessment. Water Marit Eng 156:235–247. doi: 10.1680/maen. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hallegatte S, Green C, Nicholls RJ, Corfee-Morlot J (2013) Future flood losses in major coastal cities. Nat Clim Chang 3:802–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hinkel J, Nicholls RJ, Vafeidis AT, Tol RSJ, Avagianou T (2010) Assessing risk of and adaptation to sea-level rise in the European Union: an application of DIVA. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 15(7):703–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Holman IP, Loveland PJ (2001) Regional climate change impact and response studies in east Anglia and north West England (RegIS). Final report of MAFF project no. CC0337Google Scholar
  25. Hunsaker C, Graham R, Suter G, O’Neill R, Barnthouse L, Gardner R (1990) Assessing ecological risk on a regional scale. Environ Manag 14(3):325–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. IPCC-AR5 (2014) Summary for policymakers. In: Field CB, Barros VR, Dokken DJ, Mach KJ, Mastrandrea MD, Bilir TE, Chatterjee M, Ebi KL, Estrada YO, Genova RC, Girma B, Kissel ES, Levy AN, MacCracken S, Mastrandrea PR, White LL (eds) Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–32Google Scholar
  27. IPCC (2013) Working Group I Contribution to the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report. Climate Change 2013: The physical Science basis. Summary for Policymakers, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  28. IPCC (2012) Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. A Special Report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  29. IPCC (2007a) Climate change 2007: the physical Science basis. Summary for Policymakers Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  30. IPCC (2007b) Climate change 2007: impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Summary for Policymakers. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  31. Jiménez JA, Ciavola P, Balouin Y, Armaroli C, Bosom E, Gervais M (2009) Geomorphic coastal vulnerability to storms in microtidal fetch-limited environments: application to NW Mediterranean & N Adriatic Seas. J Coastal Res SI 56:1641–1645Google Scholar
  32. Kalbfleisch JG (1985) Probability and statistical inference: volume 1: probability. Springer Texts in Statistics-Sep 9, 1985Google Scholar
  33. Landis WG (2005) Regional scale ecological risk assessment. Using the relative risk model. In: Landis WG. CRC PRESSGoogle Scholar
  34. Le Cozannet G, Rohmer J, Cazenave A, Idier D, Van De Wal R, De Winter R (2015) Evaluating uncertainties of future marine flooding occurrence as sea-level rises. Environ Model Softw 73:44–56. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.07.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lionello P (2012) The climate of the venetian and north Adriatic region: variability, trends and future change. Phys Chem Earth 40-41:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lionello P, Galati MB, Elvini E (2012) Extreme storm surge and wind wave climate scenario simulations at the venetian littoral. Phys Chem Earth 40-41:86–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lionello P, Cogo S, Galati MB, Sanna A (2008) The Mediterranean surface wave climate inferred from future scenario simulations. Glob Planet Chang 63:152–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McCann DGC (2011) A review of hurricane disaster planning for the elderly. World Med Health Policy 3(1):2Google Scholar
  39. McLaughlin S, Cooper JAG (2010) A multi-scale coastal vulnerability index: a tool for coastal managers? Environ Hazards 9:233–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nicholls RJ, Cazenave A (2010) Sea-level rise and its impact on coastal zones. Science 328:1517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nicholls RJ, Klein RJT (2005) Climate change and coastal management of Europe's coast. In: Vermaat JE, Bouwer L, Turner K, Salomons W (eds) Managing European coasts, past, present and future. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  42. Pirazzoli PA (2005) A review of possible eustatic, isostatic and tectonic contributions in eight late-Holocene relative sea-level histories from the Mediterranean area. Quat Sci Rev 24:1989–2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Post JC, Lundin CG (1996) Guidelines for integrated coastal zone management. In: environmentally sustainable development studies and monographs series no. 9. World Bank, Washington, DC, p 16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Preston BL, Smith TF, Brooke C, Gorddard R, Measham TG, Withycombe G, Mcinnes K, Abbs D, Beveridge B, Morrison C (2008) Mapping climate change vulnerability in the Sydney coastal councils group, prepared for the Sydney coastal councils groupGoogle Scholar
  45. Pugh DT, Vassie JM (1979) Extreme sea-levels from tide and surge probability. Proc. 16th Coastal Engineering Conference, 1978, Hamburg, 1. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, pp 911–930Google Scholar
  46. Purvis MJ, Bates PD, Hayes CM (2008) A probabilistic methodology to estimate future coastal flood risk due to sea level rise. Coast Eng 55:1062–1073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ramieri E, Hartley A, Barbanti A, Duarte Santos F, Gomes A, Hilden M, Laihonen P, Marinova N, Santini M (2011) Methods for assessing coastal vulnerability to climate change, European Topic Centre on Climate Change Impacts, Vulnerability and Adaptation (ETC CCA) Technical Paper, Bologna (IT), p 93Google Scholar
  48. Ramsbottom D, Sayers P, Panzeri M (2012) Climate change risk assessment for the floods and erosion sector. Defra, LondonGoogle Scholar
  49. Rizzi J, Torresan S, Gallina V, Brigolin D, Lovato T, Carniel S, Benettazzo A, Critto A, Pastres R, Marcomini A (2015a) Analysis of water quality variations impacts in the north Adriatic Sea under changing climate scenarios using a regional risk assessment approach. Marine Pollution Bulletin (in press)Google Scholar
  50. Rizzi J, Gallina V, Torresan S, Critto A, Marcomini A (2015b) Regional risk assessment addressing the impacts of climate change in the coastal area of the Gulf of Gabes (Tunisia). Sustain Sci (in press)Google Scholar
  51. Ronco P, Bullo M, Torresan S, Critto A, Olschewski R, Zappa M, Marcomini A (2015) A.: KULTURisk regional risk assessment methodology for water-related natural hazards–Part 2: application to the Zurich case study. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 19:1561–1576. doi: 10.5194/hess-19-1561-2015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ronco P, Gallina V, Torresan S, Zabeo A, Semenzin E, Critto A, Marcomini A (2014) The KULTURisk regional risk assessment methodology for water-related natural hazards – Part 1: physical–environmental assessment. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 18:5399–5414. doi: 10.5194/hess-18-5399-2014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schmidt-Thomé P, Greiving S, Kallio H, Fleischhauer H, Jarva J (2006) Economic risk maps of floods and earthquakes for European regions. Quat Int 150:103–112. doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2006.01.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Seminara G, Bolla Pittaluga M, Tambroni N, Garotta V (2005) Open problems in modelling the long-term morphodynamic evolution of the Venice lagoon. In: Fletcher CA, Spencer T (eds) Flooding and environmental challenges for Venice and its lagoon: state of knowledge. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 369–378Google Scholar
  55. Sharples C (2006) Indicative mapping of Tasmanian coastal vulnerability to climate change and sea level rise: explanatory report, 2nd edn. Department of Primary Industries, Water & Environment, Tasmania, p 112Google Scholar
  56. Simeoni U, Fontolan G, Tessari U, Corbau C (2007) Domains of spit evolution in the Goro area, Po Delta, Italy. Geomorphology 86:332–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tomasin A, Pirazzoli PA (2007) Extreme sea levels on the Adriatic coast: a comparison of estimation methods. Atti dell’Istituto Veneto di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti, Tomo CLXVII (2008-2009), Classe di scienze fisiche, matematiche e naturali, pp 53–82Google Scholar
  58. Torresan S, Critto A, Tonino M, Alberighi E, Pizzol L, Santoro F and Marcomini A (2009) Climate change risk assessment for coastal management. In: Özhan E (ed) Proceedings of the ninth international conference on the Mediterranean coastal environment, 10–14 November 2009, Sochi, Russia, MEDCOAST, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey, pp 91–102Google Scholar
  59. Torresan S, Critto A, Dalla Valle M, Harvey N, Marcomini A (2008) Assessing coastal vulnerability to climate change: comparing segmentation at global and regional scales. Sustain Sci 3:45–65. doi: 10.1007/s11625-008-0045-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Torresan S, Critto A, Rizzi J, Marcomini A (2012) Assessment of coastal vulnerability to climate change hazards at the regional scale: the case study of the North Adriatic Sea. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 12(7):2347–2368Google Scholar
  61. Tsimplis MN, Spencer NE (1997) Collection and analysis of monthly mean sea level data in the Mediterranean and the Black Sea. J Coast Res 13(2):534–544Google Scholar
  62. UNISDR (2009) Terminology: basic terms of disaster risk reduction. Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  63. Vousdoukas MI, Voukouvalas E, Annunziato A, Giardino A, Feyen L (2016) Projections of extreme storm surge levels along Europe. Clim Dyn. doi: 10.1007/s00382-016-3019-5 Google Scholar
  64. Vermeer M, Rahmstorf S (2009) Global sea level linked to global temperature. In: PNAS proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, December 22, 2009, vol 106, no. 51, (ISSN-0027-8424)Google Scholar
  65. Willows R, Reynard N, Meadowcroft I, Connell R (2003) Climate adaptation: Risk, uncertainty and decision-making. Part 2. UK Climate Impacts Programme, Oxford, pp 41–87Google Scholar
  66. Wolff C, Vafeidis AT, Lincke D, Marasmi C, Hinkel J (2016) Effects of scale and input data on assessing the future impacts of coastal flooding: an application of DIVA for the Emilia-Romagna coast. Front Mar Sci 3:41. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2016.00041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Rizzi
    • 1
    • 2
  • S. Torresan
    • 1
  • A. Zabeo
    • 1
  • A. Critto
    • 1
    • 2
  • A. Tosoni
    • 3
  • A. Tomasin
    • 2
  • A. Marcomini
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Fondazione Centro Euro-Mediterraneo sui Cambiamenti Climatici (CMCC)LecceItaly
  2. 2.Department of Environmental Sciences, Informatics and StatisticsUniversity Ca’ Foscari VeniceVeniceItaly
  3. 3.Istituzione Centro Previsioni e Segnalazioni MareeVeniceItaly

Personalised recommendations