Retrospective assessment of a managed coastal realignment and lagoon restoration measure: the Geltinger Birk, Germany

Abstract

We document and analyse the implementation process of a large combined coastal protection realignment and nature protection rewetting scheme, covering about 1000 ha at the German Baltic coast. The assessment reviews local planning documents, includes a media analysis, a tourist survey, stakeholder interviews and we provide criteria for measuring success, derived from the Systems Approach Framework (SAF) concept. The full process in the Geltinger Birk took over 25 years and was finished in 2013. The early years were characterised by strong local opposition, a polarization of the local society, misinformation and negative media coverage. Land purchase, the establishment of a local information centre with an environmental manager, improved public participation, a more pro-active media strategy and the readiness to accept compromises finally enabled a successful implementation. Today, a comprehensive tourism information and guidance system exists and the area became a popular tourist place. 80% of all visitors point out the outstanding nature experience and 87% are positive about the combined coastal protection and restoration measure. Parallel, major stakeholders changed their attitude and today are positive about the situation. However, the long timespan between initiation of the process and implementation of the measure, calls for a systematic, guided management approach, like the SAF. Especially, because climate change, sea level rise and increasing pressures on the coasts require a much faster implementation of adaptation measures in future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

References

  1. Doody PJ (2013) Coastal squeeze and managed realignment in Southeast England, does it tell us anything about the future? Ocean Coast Manag 79:34–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Esteves LS (2013) Is managed realignment a sustainable long-term coastal management approach? J Coast Res 1(SI 65):933–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Esteves LS, Thomas K (2014) Managed realignment in practice in the UK: results from two independent surveys. J Coast Res 70:407–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. French PW (2006) Managed realignment – the developing story of a comparatively new approach to soft engineering. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 67:409–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hopkins TS, Bailly D, Elmgren R, Glegg G, Sandberg A, Støttrup JG (2012) A systems approach framework for the transition to sustainable development: potential value based on coastal experiments. Ecol Soc 17(3):39. doi:10.5751/ES-05266-170339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. MELUR-SH (2012) Generalplan Küstenschutz des Landes Schleswig-Holstein – Fortschreibung https://www.schleswig-holstein.de/DE/Fachinhalte/K/kuestenschutz/Downloads/Generalplan.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=1

  7. MELUR-SH (2014) Fachplan Küstenschutz Ostseeküste SH http://www.schleswig-holstein.de/DE/Fachinhalte/K/kuestenschutz_fachplaene/Dossier/_functions/teaser_tabelle_Ostsee.html

  8. MLR - Ministerium für ländliche Räume, Landesplanung, Landwirtschaft und Tourismus des Landes Schleswig-Holstein (2001) Generalplan Küstenschutz - integriertes Küstenschutzmanagement in Schleswig-Holstein. Kiel, p 76

  9. MLUR-SH Ministerium für Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und ländliche Räume des Landes Schleswig-Holstein (2007) Safe Coast: Excursion to Geltinger Birk http://geltinger-birk.de/

  10. MLUR-SH Ministerium für Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und ländliche Räume des Landes Schleswig-Holstein (2011) Moorschutzprogramm für Schleswig-Holstein Drucksache 16/2272. https://www.schleswig-holstein.de/DE/Fachinhalte/N/naturschutz/Downloads/Drucksache_17_1490.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=2

  11. Morris RK (2012) Managed realignment: a sediment management perspective. Ocean Coast Manag 65:59–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nordstrom KF, Lampe R, Jackson N (2007) Increasing the dynamism of coastal landforms by modifying shore protection methods: examples from the eastern German Baltic Sea coast. Environ Conserv 34:205–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pendle M (2013) Estuarine and coastal managed realignment sites in England a comparison of predictions with monitoring results for selected case studies. HR Wallingford, Howbery Park, p 36 http://eprints.hrwallingford.co.uk/664/1/HRPP627-Managed_realignment.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  14. Prati G, Albanesi C, Pietrantoni L, Airoldi L (2016) Public perceptions of beach nourishment and conflict management strategies: a case study of Portonovo Bay in the Adriatic Italian coast. Land Use Policy 50:422–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Roca E, Villares M (2012) Public perceptions of managed realignment strategies: the case study of the Ebro Delta in the Mediterranean basin. Ocean Coast Manag 60:38–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rupp-Armstrong S, Nicholls RJ (2007) Coastal and estuarine retreat: a comparison of the application of managed realignment in England and Germany. J Coast Res 23:1418–1430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Spencer KL, Harvey GL (2012) Understanding system disturbance and ecosystem services in restored saltmarshes: integrating physical and biogeochemical processes. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 106:23–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Turner RK, Burgess D, Hadley D, Coombes E, Jackson N (2007) A cost-benefit appraisal of coastal management realignment policy. Glob Environ Chang 17:397–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Weisner E, Schernewski G (2013) Adaptation to climate change: A combined coastal protection and re-alignment scheme in a southern Baltic tourism region. J Coast Res 2(SI 65):1963–1968

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. J. Hofstede, Ministerium für Energiewende, Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und ländliche Räume des Landes Schleswig-Holstein, for giving access to the ministry archive and Prof. Dr. F. Saathoff for supervision of and helpful comments on the master thesis by C. Barthel.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerald Schernewski.

Ethics declarations

Funding

The work was part-funded by the BONUS-BaltCoast project. BONUS-BaltCoast has received funding from BONUS (Art 185) funded jointly from the European Union’s Seventh Programme for research, technological development and demonstration, and from Baltic Sea national funding institutions (BMBF 03F0717A).

Appendix

Appendix

Table 2 Chronology of the Geltinger Birk development and the combined coastal protection, re-alignment and wetland restoration measure

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schernewski, G., Bartel, C., Kobarg, N. et al. Retrospective assessment of a managed coastal realignment and lagoon restoration measure: the Geltinger Birk, Germany. J Coast Conserv 22, 157–167 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-017-0496-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Public perception
  • Public participation
  • Rewetting
  • Coastal wetlands
  • Coastal development
  • Tourist survey